Rants, Raves, Reviews

I was never that good at Math...

By Gary R, in , posted: 9-May-2007 11:02

As a mathematical expression -

In the beginning there was X = Xtra, M = MSN, Y = Yahoo and G = Google

X+M=XM but Y>M so (X-M)+Y=YX now YX<>M but M+Y>YX leaving X<MY or XMY>YX but XMY<G

So is it back to X on its own which is a lot less than either M or Y but XMY will probably never be greater than G.

And according to the media Y = $50b

I am looking forward to the TV ad. Now do they add an extra male or female to represent the 'M' in the already heterosexual Y!X relationship? I guess you could refer to XMY as a ménage à trois and Labour may need to consider expanding the laws around Civil Unions to include a third party. I just wonder what happens if 'G' ever decides to join 'XMY'? The traditional nuclear family was so much easier!


Other related posts:
I Thought I would Come Back
Unemployment does get boring
Over the 'i'

Comment by chiefie, on 9-May-2007 11:47

polygamy... mmm

One question, when did M+Y? I thought Y/M a few days ago in a rumour of splitting their JV on IM? Also, there is no chance that XMY will ever exist, therefore XMY!>YX or even XMY!

In short draw, X is still the worst out, or worse than previous state.

Author's note by Jama, on 9-May-2007 12:16

There are rumours that M+Y=MY because of the G+DC=GDC

Comment by chiefie, on 9-May-2007 12:25

Who is "DC"?

Author's note by Jama, on 9-May-2007 12:27

DC = Double Click

Comment by chiefie, on 9-May-2007 13:40

I think your blog has captured NZ Herald's attention.

check out the link: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10438480

"M + Y is NOT greater than G", according to the bloggers watching the fascinating M&A (mergers and acquisitions) byplays involving Microsoft, Yahoo! and Google lately.

And this "blogger" that mentioned in the story, could most likely be you, as it seems like we're doing "math" here...

Author's note by Jama, on 9-May-2007 13:53

They were a day earlier than me by the look of it. Their article is from yesterday so they are not using my math probably because my math was crap :( But I can claim the discovery of the new variable called 'X'.

Comment by TomAckroyd, on 9-May-2007 16:41

Look where xkcd put Yahoo and Microsoft:


Add a comment

Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted. E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.

Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.

Your name:

Your e-mail:

Your webpage:

Jama's profile

Gary R
New Zealand

Jama JamLocations of visitors to this page

link luvin

Where I work

Ranked Blogs

DeLorean Cars to be Built Agai...
(30-Jul-2007 15:36, 96991 views)
Will my phone work on the new ...
(28-Apr-2009 12:50, 51956 views)
Reminiscing on Palm...
(29-Mar-2006 12:15, 44443 views)
Telstra UMTS 850 - what a chal...
(26-May-2006 17:03, 31593 views)
Yahoo and Xtra Retardo Mail...
(1-Mar-2007 13:27, 30329 views)
Sierra Wireless 595U USB EVDO ...
(10-Jul-2007 23:12, 28936 views)
The Price of Milk...
(10-Jul-2007 19:35, 25379 views)
GE Money where did they come f...
(4-Jul-2006 19:06, 24527 views)
Dangerous Dave and Brutal Bob...
(18-May-2007 11:04, 19505 views)
Wind Turbine micro power gener...
(28-Jun-2007 19:15, 19417 views)

Most Recent

I Thought I would Come Back...
Unemployment does get boring...
Will my phone work on the new ...
Telstra 21...
Qualcomm gen 2 Gobi World Mode...
Acer Aspire One Netbook Teardo...
Vodafone NZ Launches 3G Acer A...
Over the 'i'...
Sprint USB multi 'G' modem...
Head of New Media buys into 'o...

View blog authority

Technorati Profile

Add to Technorati Favorites

View blog reactions