A list of the impacts can be found here. I think this move by Microsoft will have nothing short of a deleterious PR fallout and have angered and confused sysadmins everywhere.
Microsoft's Virtual PC isn't even that great anyway. VMware have the market's best offer: ESX server. It runs on a Linux skeleton which makes it very fast so it's easy to guess why Microsoft are upset, knowing their own Virtual PC runs like an elephant on roller skates, even when compared to the free VMware Player and OpenVZ.
What do you think about this?
Other related posts:
Sound the alarm: ACTA negotiations delayed
I'm not protesting S92a
watch Al Jazeera on XBMC
Comment by bradstewart, on 5-Mar-2007 12:31
I tried running a WinXP Virtual PC VM in ESX Server and it bluescreened on startup.
Had quite a few issues like that so can't say it's a bad thing. As for VPC 2007 and VMware Player:
VPC has less of an impact on the host OS but the guest OS runs slightly slower.
VMware Player renders the host OS almost inoperable but the guest OS seems to run faster than the VPC one. So it's a tradeoff
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.