Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Place your bets for the Hawaiki handicap
Posted on 20-Nov-2013 08:51 by Bill Bennett. | Tags Filed under: News.



Writing at the Dominion-Post, Tom Pillar-Stretcher rates Hawaiki’s chance of getting its planned submarine cable away at ”better than 50:50″. The NBR’s Chris Keall puts the odds much higher. He says: “The blunt reality is that Hawaiki is unlikely to succeed“. You need an NBR subscription to read the story.

That’s quite a spread.

Keall makes the point that Hawaiki has a good game on paper. There’s a steady flow of press releases and announcements. This gives the impression the project is moving quickly ahead.

But as Keall points out, there’s little substantial. Mainly non-binding agreements with potential customers.  Even yesterday’s news about an US landing site is nebulous. Hawaiki has agreements with partners in place, but it hasn’t yet got the green light from the US government to actually land a cable. that’s a much harder step.

Incidentally no-one has explained why Hawaiki’s earlier plan to build its cable as far as Hawaii and then pick up on existing submarine links changed.

While the Southern Cross Cable Network has plenty of unused capacity, there’s a case for building at least one additional submarine cable out of New Zealand if only for resiliency. The chances of both Southern Cross links breaking at the same time may be small, but it would be economically devastating.

Another argument is that there are benefits from a cable not owned, or part-owned, by telcos. Although that really falls more in the ‘nice to have’ than the ‘must have’ category.

On the other hand, it’s not clear why a trans-Pacific link is still essential. New Zealand’s communications centre of gravity is moving to our West. More and more key data is being cached or hosted by data centres in Australia. When New Zealand companies buy overseas cloud services they are more likely to work with Australian or Asian hosts than US-based services.

There’s talk of better ping times from a direct connection. Are a few milliseconds wait so important that it makes sense to spend upwards of $300 million?

Meanwhile three telcos plan to build a new trans-Tasman cable. This could prove more important for most local users.

Where does this leave Hawaiki and what are the chances of the trans-Pacific cable being built? The answer isn’t down to New Zealand, a best we’d only use a fraction of the traffic on the network. It isn’t really about what we want or need here, it’s about whether Australian customers need another trans-Pacific cable. After all, the business model depends of their business.

[digitl 2013]

digitl on Google+




comments powered by Disqus




Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Gareth Morgan is a genius
Created by Satch, last reply by Rikkitic on 10-Dec-2016 12:12 (167 replies)
Pages... 10 11 12


NZ Prime Minister John Key Resigns
Created by ajobbins, last reply by networkn on 10-Dec-2016 11:10 (219 replies)
Pages... 13 14 15


The President Of The USA - Who do you think?
Created by TimA, last reply by DarthKermit on 8-Dec-2016 16:22 (909 replies)
Pages... 59 60 61


Spark wireless broadband and home /lan access: CGNAT limitations
Created by yokkem, last reply by BarTender on 8-Dec-2016 15:57 (19 replies)
Pages... 2


Spark not planning to deploy native IPv6 at all. Ever.
Created by Erayd, last reply by sbiddle on 7-Dec-2016 20:57 (19 replies)
Pages... 2


Woooaaahh earthquake 2016-11-14
Created by Fred99, last reply by DarthKermit on 9-Dec-2016 16:16 (471 replies)
Pages... 30 31 32


Wilson's Car Park - When Free is not free
Created by nzkiwiman, last reply by cr250bromo on 9-Dec-2016 09:30 (51 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


JB Hifi Cost & GST Sale - 7th Dec
Created by Finch, last reply by Kopkiwi on 7-Dec-2016 15:11 (16 replies)
Pages... 2