Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Chorus: A tempting proposal, some merit, some flaws
Posted on 18-Feb-2014 08:54 by Bill Bennett. | Tags Filed under: News.



How much would it cost to build and run a copper telecommunications network if you were starting from scratch today?

Thatís the question at the heart of the Commerce Commissionís mission to regulate the price service providers pay Chorus to provide customers with copper-based broadband.

Indirectly itís also at the root of the recent financial troubles plaguing Chorus.

Working out the cost of building and running a new network is far from simple. Apart from anything else, no-one would build a fresh copper-based network today, it isnít the smartest or the most efficient option. Newly rich countries that donít already have copper networks arenít building them. Instead †they move direct to wireless networks.

Rather than plough through hypothetical alternatives, Chorus has suggested the Commerce Commission cuts to the chase and uses††the actual cost of the companyís existing copper network as a starting point.

It makes sense. After all, the existing Chorus copper network is the nearest thing we have to a modern equivalent copper network.

And itís tempting. By opening the books, Chorus would let Commerce Commission analysts see first hand what a network costs. Presumably the information will not all be made public, but there will be insights in to how these things work.

If nothing else, it will speed up the investigation.

But there are downsides, as Tuanz CEO Paul Brislen points out in his organisationís blog:

Chorus hasnít always made the†smartest decisions when it comes to its costs†and that modelling these inefficiencies and ruling them out would have to go by the by. Chorus suggests the expense and time taken to model for these would be hopeless and so itís an all or nothing approach Ė you can have the data, but you canít remove the warts.

Brislen goes on to point out rival telco CallPlus sells a similar product on the market today for less than the previously announced draft access price that caused all the fuss.

In other words, Chorus is effectively asking the Commerce Commission to factor in the companyís inefficiencies.

If Brislen is luke-warm about the Chorus proposal, opposition communications spokesperson Clare Curran is downright icy. She says:

The company does not have a great track record for efficiency or competence when it comes to rolling out the ultrafast broadband network.

Any recommendations Chorus makes which involve Ďtrust us to come up with the right answersí should be regarded with healthy scepticism. The company wants the best price possible.

She has a point. Chorus wouldnít have come up with a proposal that wasnít in line with getting the result it wants from the Commerce Commission.

The post Chorus: A tempting proposal, some merit, some flaws appeared first on digitl.




comments powered by Disqus




Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

How I propose to fix the property market.
Created by Aredwood, last reply by frankv on 27-Jul-2016 06:59 (61 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Which island to go to on holiday?
Created by nate, last reply by Asmodeus on 26-Jul-2016 22:25 (27 replies)
Pages... 2


It must take a very special person...
Created by Dynamic, last reply by Dynamic on 25-Jul-2016 11:53 (18 replies)
Pages... 2


Wifi hotspot on a timer for restaurant?
Created by adamshand, last reply by olivernz on 26-Jul-2016 17:29 (17 replies)
Pages... 2


Android 6 location aware sound profiles / automation?
Created by timmmay, last reply by Stu on 23-Jul-2016 16:07 (14 replies)

Johnny Moore: I blame baby boomers for housing mess
Created by tdgeek, last reply by dickytim on 27-Jul-2016 06:35 (65 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Converting to main pressure and gas.
Created by Paul1977, last reply by Scott3 on 26-Jul-2016 23:01 (27 replies)
Pages... 2


Pre pay texting
Created by madcarue, last reply by madcarue on 25-Jul-2016 14:32 (13 replies)