Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Fixing Apple, Google, Facebook tax
Posted on 18-Mar-2016 16:24 by Bill Bennett. | Tags Filed under: News.

Writing at the New Zealand Herald Matt Nippert says Top multinationals pay almost no tax in New Zealand.

A major Herald investigation has found the 20 multinational companies most aggressive in shifting profits out of New Zealand overall paid virtually no income tax, despite recording nearly $10 billion in annual sales to Kiwi consumers.

The analysis of financial information of more than 100 multinational corporations and their New Zealand subsidiaries showed that, had the New Zealand branches of these 20 firms reported profits at the same healthy rate as their parents, their combined income tax bill would have been nearly $490 million.

Big companies not paying tax may be legal, it isn’t moral. They shuffle profits to countries with low taxes so they can avoid paying for the taxpayer-funded infrastructure and social spending that made them rich in the first place.

Two tax avoiding tech giants Facebook and Google grew wealthy on the back of the internet.

It was originally paid for by taxpayers in countries like the USA and the UK. The internet wouldn’t exist without taxpayers, nor would Google or Facebook.

Apple grew into one of the world’s largest businesses on the back of the iPhone.

Yet for much of its history, Apple mainly sold computers. A large number of those sales were to schools. It depended on government funded education to keep it afloat during the lean years.

Without taxes, there would be no Facebook, Google or Apple.

Large countries like the USA, UK and even medium-size ones like Australia have moved to close the loopholes allowing multinationals to avoid taxes. New Zealand has less room for manoeuvre.

In the long-term our best chance of dealing with the problem is by taking part in international initiatives.

In the meantime, there is something we can do. We could insist government purchasers only buy from the companies who pay their fair share of tax.

Sure, fair share is a debatable and nebulous term. The less than one percent paid by some companies on Nippert’s list is not fair.

Not buying from tax avoiders would mean no more government purchased iPhones, no government Google Apps accounts, no government advertisements on Facebook.

At least not until they pay up.

Not taking this approach amounts to rewarding bad behaviour.

Filed under: Money Tagged: government

comments powered by Disqus

Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Labour weekend plans?
Created by DarthKermit, last reply by sleemanj on 21-Oct-2016 23:37 (22 replies)
Pages... 2

Gigabit cable now available
Created by sub, last reply by cynnicallemon on 21-Oct-2016 11:55 (45 replies)
Pages... 2 3

Kiwibank Platinum by fees not by service?
Created by joker97, last reply by richms on 21-Oct-2016 23:06 (19 replies)
Pages... 2

Sony XZ Owners discussion
Created by networkn, last reply by networkn on 21-Oct-2016 23:06 (66 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5

screwing a gate post into concrete
Created by hattrick123, last reply by simon14 on 18-Oct-2016 14:05 (33 replies)
Pages... 2 3

Who is this women? She is possibly the most famous women on the internet and nobody knows who she is.
Created by jimbob79, last reply by cynnicallemon on 20-Oct-2016 13:28 (14 replies)

Insane Noel Leeming pricing - $400 Micro SD card
Created by sidders80, last reply by joker97 on 20-Oct-2016 19:30 (27 replies)
Pages... 2

Is windows 10 anniversary update causing you problems
Created by robjg63, last reply by mdav056 on 20-Oct-2016 14:01 (27 replies)
Pages... 2