Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Fixing Apple, Google, Facebook tax
Posted on 18-Mar-2016 16:24 by Bill Bennett. | Tags Filed under: News.


Writing at the New Zealand Herald Matt Nippert says Top multinationals pay almost no tax in New Zealand.

A major Herald investigation has found the 20 multinational companies most aggressive in shifting profits out of New Zealand overall paid virtually no income tax, despite recording nearly $10 billion in annual sales to Kiwi consumers.

The analysis of financial information of more than 100 multinational corporations and their New Zealand subsidiaries showed that, had the New Zealand branches of these 20 firms reported profits at the same healthy rate as their parents, their combined income tax bill would have been nearly $490 million.

Big companies not paying tax may be legal, it isn’t moral. They shuffle profits to countries with low taxes so they can avoid paying for the taxpayer-funded infrastructure and social spending that made them rich in the first place.

Two tax avoiding tech giants Facebook and Google grew wealthy on the back of the internet.

It was originally paid for by taxpayers in countries like the USA and the UK. The internet wouldn’t exist without taxpayers, nor would Google or Facebook.

Apple grew into one of the world’s largest businesses on the back of the iPhone.

Yet for much of its history, Apple mainly sold computers. A large number of those sales were to schools. It depended on government funded education to keep it afloat during the lean years.

Without taxes, there would be no Facebook, Google or Apple.

Large countries like the USA, UK and even medium-size ones like Australia have moved to close the loopholes allowing multinationals to avoid taxes. New Zealand has less room for manoeuvre.

In the long-term our best chance of dealing with the problem is by taking part in international initiatives.

In the meantime, there is something we can do. We could insist government purchasers only buy from the companies who pay their fair share of tax.

Sure, fair share is a debatable and nebulous term. The less than one percent paid by some companies on Nippert’s list is not fair.

Not buying from tax avoiders would mean no more government purchased iPhones, no government Google Apps accounts, no government advertisements on Facebook.

At least not until they pay up.

Not taking this approach amounts to rewarding bad behaviour.


Filed under: Money Tagged: government



comments powered by Disqus




Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

The President Of The USA: Donald Trump
Created by TimA, last reply by Rikkitic on 18-Jan-2017 14:02 (1734 replies)
Pages... 114 115 116


New Unlimited Fixed Broadband
Created by LivingSkinny, last reply by SkinnyBB on 18-Jan-2017 10:00 (52 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Sony TV switching TV from sky to freeview
Created by chunkybeats, last reply by dolsen on 17-Jan-2017 15:06 (16 replies)
Pages... 2


Upsize my American houses to McMansion value deal.
Created by kingdragonfly, last reply by richms on 18-Jan-2017 15:48 (14 replies)

BP Ultimate Petrol (98) prices
Created by Satch, last reply by Satch on 18-Jan-2017 12:11 (28 replies)
Pages... 2


New fibre install and SunGenie power supply
Created by littleheaven, last reply by littleheaven on 16-Jan-2017 22:41 (14 replies)

Mountain Bike Recommendation
Created by networkn, last reply by joker97 on 15-Jan-2017 22:14 (14 replies)

Making a complaint to a retailer and processes.
Created by mattwnz, last reply by Jas777 on 18-Jan-2017 15:38 (27 replies)
Pages... 2