The code is free and open source, which is great. Looking under the hood reveals that it is based on a slightly older version of OpenOffice, a well-known open source productivity suite, which is commonly included in most modern Linux distributions and is already used by quite a few governments and other public institutions around the world. But OpenOffice itself has just released the latest version (2.3), which consequently probably can do a few more things than Lotus Symphony.
Still, I am glad that IBM took these steps and that they seem to be successful with it. Why? Several reasons:
- On one hand, by working with the OpenOffice source code base, the IBM engineers are also contributing back to the wider open source community. Any bug fixes and feature additions they have made for their Lotus Symphony release will likely help OpenOffice in general.
- Lotus is a well-known brand name. There are still plenty of organisations out there, which are Lotus users. For them, using a productivity suite from IBM, with all the necessary interoperability and integration issues taken care of, will be a nice alternative to proprietary solutions.
- Symphony, like OpenOffice in general, uses the ODF document standard. ODF is an open, well established and widely tested and implemented standard for storing documents of all kinds. Applications from many different vendors can read and write ODF documents. This is in contrast with proprietary document formats, for which only the vendor of the application has the complete spec. Microsoft comes to mind with its traditional Office formats, and also the new OOXML 'standard', which has been widely and correctly criticised for not really being a standard at all.
Other related posts:
UK government supports open source
25 open source projects for software development
Dabbling in OpenSolaris
Comment by Matthew Cruickshank, on 23-Oct-2007 18:31
I thought it was closed source but free, and mostly based on another codebase unrelated to OpenOffice.org. They did come to some agreement with Sun though to use OpenOffice.org's OpenDocument filters.
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.