foobar on computers, software and the rest of the world


The proof that DRM truly sucks

, posted: 23-Apr-2008 17:23

The proof that DRM truly sucks and only serves to limit your own rights, today comes to us courtesy of Microsoft. Don't worry, this posting here is not going to be a Microsoft bash-fest. It really just about DRM and the dangers that it brings. If you ever needed any convincing, or if you ever felt that DRM is 'not so bad', just have a read at this and also the discussion on Slashdot about it.

Essentially, Microsoft is going to turn off the authorisation servers for songs puchased from the (now defunct) MSN Music store. You can still get a permanent authorisation for a given OS or computer, but if you ever decide to upgrade that OS or change the computer you will be out of luck. The songs you 'puchased' will simply not play anymore.

There you have it: You think you are buying music, but really you are completely dependent on a single company. That company giveth, and that company taketh away. I don't think that a company should have a right to do that to stuff you bought. Sure, in the small print it will say that you didn't purchase anything, and just got a license to use. But all the legalese doesn't help the issue: As the user, the buyer is suddenly realising that the money he or she spent is gone, along with the song.

Refund? No. Trying to make a copy without the DRM? That's a crime. Some company pulling the plug on your music collection without any compensation of any kind? Perfectly ok... That doesn't sound right to me.

Maybe a few more incidences like that will illustrate to more people the severely screwed up nature of DRM schemes.


Tag(s):     


Other related posts:
More Apple madness (follow up)
The GPU, your personal desktop super computer
A truly light-weight OS: Written in ASM, with GUI, networking and apps








Comment by freitasm, on 23-Apr-2008 19:21

DRM is bad.


Comment by paradoxsm, on 23-Apr-2008 20:14

DRM looks to be on the way out much to the delight of users. the people that pay for music are hardly going to quickly pirate them off.

these few company failures and the horrible sound quality of the 128kbps files have proven there is still plenty of life in the old cd. Let's wtch DRM see a final death.........


Comment by Dratsab, on 23-Apr-2008 21:51

"the people that pay for music are hardly going to quickly pirate them off"

I think you've hit the nail on the head. Technology like this serves only to try and 'keep honest people honest' but ultimately those honest people get bitten. That's when they get annoyed and start looking for pirated material.

In the meantime, pirates work out ways to defeat the technology (they probably already cracked this one) and carry on as normal...


Comment by hellonearthisman, on 24-Apr-2008 03:21

"Refund? No. Trying to make a copy without the DRM? That's a crime."

Well no it's not any more, as you can by law format shift music in nz.
If they are going to stop it working then you have even more rights to get to going.


Comment by TinyTim, on 24-Apr-2008 08:12

...unless the publisher says "you are not allowed to format shift this song". They are allowed to opt-out of letting you format shift the music.


Comment by freitasm, on 20-Jun-2008 08:45

Yes, it really sucks. But at least Microsoft had decided to keep the servers running until 2011.


Add a comment

Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted. E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.

Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.

Your name:

Your e-mail:

Your webpage:

foobar's profile

 
New Zealand


  • Who I am: Software developer and consultant.
  • What I do: System level programming, Linux/Unix. C, C++, Java, Python, and a long time ago even Assembler.
  • What I like: I'm a big fan of free and open source software. I'm Windows-free, running Ubuntu on my laptop. To a somewhat lesser degree, I also follow the SaaS industry.
  • Where I have been: Here and there, all over the place.




Google Search


Recent posts

Attack on net neutrality right...
Munich already saved millions ...
Iceland's public administratio...
More Apple madness (follow up)...
Apple demonstrates: With great...
Smooth sailing with the Karmic...
Censorship in New Zealand: Wid...
Image roll-over effects withou...
How about: Three strikes and Y...
UK government supports open so...


Top 10

How to write a Linux virus in ...
(11-Feb-2009 06:33, 457911 views)
Follow up: How to write a Linu...
(12-Feb-2009 08:10, 64340 views)
A truly light-weight OS: Writt...
(3-Feb-2009 10:39, 46491 views)
The 'Verified by Visa' fiasco ...
(20-Jun-2008 09:59, 32262 views)
EEE PC with XP is cheaper than...
(9-May-2008 06:50, 20199 views)
11 reasons to switch to Linux...
(4-Feb-2009 09:24, 20113 views)
Would you use Google App Engin...
(8-Apr-2008 20:02, 19393 views)
Censorship in New Zealand: Wid...
(16-Jul-2009 12:11, 18843 views)
Django Plugables: Tons of plug...
(11-Apr-2008 03:24, 16796 views)
Slow file copy bug in Vista: A...
(21-Dec-2007 12:18, 15924 views)