Well, not anymore. With closed-source software, you have no idea what is going to happen. In this case, the Windows Vista Media Center stopped recording certain TV programs, because the broadcaster (NBC in this case) set the 'broadcast flag' on those programs. Since the software is closed-source, you cannot fix this bug. This wouldn't have happened with open source software...
BTW, this is not a discussion about whether it is right to record copyrighted material. This is simply about how control over what you can and cannot do with your own computer is taken away from you by closed-source software without a means to correct this behaviour, or to possibly know in advance what kinds of rules will be enforced on you.
Computers run our lives, whether we like it or not. They govern our lives and what we can and cannot do. Closed source software represents rules and regulations ('laws' in effect) that cannot be examined or modified, even by broad consent of the general public. Why would we want to do this to ourselves? Why would we want to yield control over our own lives to profit-oriented corporations, whose only interest is their own bottom line? There's nothing wrong with being a profit-oriented corporation, but I don't want them to determine what I can and cannot do. Especially with my own things, my own computer and my own data.
Don't let vendors determine your freedoms and liberties. Don't let someone else take control over the ever more important computers that run our lives. We need to know what these computers are doing with our data, what they allow us to do, and we need the right to modify this if we as free people deem it necessary to do so. Just like we have the right to change the laws (with due process) in a democracy, so we have to have the right to change what our computers are doing with our stuff. Not being able to do so means not being free!
Closed-source software inherently takes away control and insight into the rules that govern your life. Free and open source software is the answer to that problem.
Other related posts:
PC World: Move your business to Linux, not Vista
The great 'Windows collapse' of 2011?
Firefox and Google at Microsoft
Comment by JamesHip, on 20-May-2008 07:35
Anarchist! But seriously, you raise a good point. Personal responsiblity and free will are the definitions of liberties that are worth keeping; which JFK said required "constant vigilence" lest others attempt to take it away.
Comment by mobygeek, on 20-May-2008 15:34
How do you know open source software doesn't have hidden agendas, though?
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.