foobar on computers, software and the rest of the world


The i-9-11 event and the end of the Internet as we know it

, posted: 7-Aug-2008 06:26

After the terrible events of September 11, 2001 it didn't take long for a piece of legislature to be passed in the US, called the Patriot Act. That is a massive set of laws ostensibly designed to help in the fight against terrorism, with the initially ignored but now widely recognised 'side effect' of weakening civil liberties and disregarding human rights when convenient.

This exhaustive set of laws was passed just 20 days after the attacks. Of course, the law wasn't just created in those 20 days. Instead, it had been written many years before already and was just sitting in the drawers waiting for the right time to be passed. The 'right time' here being a state of fear and panic, which would make the passing of such a controversial law possible.

What does this have to do with us and this Internet/computer related blog and site? Well, as it turns out, a similar law is already written and waiting to be dropped 'on the Internet' in case of a major security event in that space. Take a look at this video here, where Lawrence Lessig recalls a conversation with Richard Clarke, the former US government counter-terrorism czar.

Lessig had asked Clarke if the Department of Justice had something like the Patriot Act, an "i-Patriot Act" if you will, ready to be applied to the Internet in the event of a "cyber-9/11." Clarke responded, "Of course they do. And Vint Cerf won't like it.".

You can also follow the discussion about it here on Slashdot.

With the Patriot Act many got the impression that some 'hawks' in the government probably were quite grateful for whatever happened on 9/11, so that they finally had a chance to pass these laws. I'm not into conspiracy theories and I don't believe that the US government had any hand in these attacks. But one can't help the impression that the event and the resulting fear and panic was certainly taken advantage of to get rid of some of those pesky human rights and civil liberties. Not even by all of the government, but just by some people within it.

I think in the case of the Internet the desire of the same type of people to limit its inherent freedom is even greater. These people don't understand the Internet, or they fear that with the freedoms that it brings we are not as easily controllable anymore. And as we are removing ourselves from control and censorship, we are to be feared for our free will and opinions and ideas. Thus, a reason needs to be found to bring us back under control.

What forms will this take? Exhaustive monitoring of communication, gathering of data, possible bans on encryption, limits on what can and cannot be trasmitted over the Internet, etc. Basically, all the things the Patriot Acts did, just applied to the Internet. As we know now, the law for this is already written. Its proponents are just waiting for the right time.

On one hand, a security event in 'cyper space' is not going to as horrifying to most people as planes crashing into sky scrapers. But on the other hand, most people don't understand the technology on the Internet anyway, they don't understand that the Internet has the potential to change human civilisation in a profound and positive way. And because they don't understand... well, there will be even less outrage about draconian laws being passed. In the end, it probably doesn't take an event of the same horrific scale to get this new legislation through.

This is something to be very worried about, because we know that there is a Damocles Sword hanging over the Internet that we know and over the freedoms that it brings. And some people are just waiting to cut the string.

And before we get all high and mighty about this being a US issue only, and how we (in other countries) would never do something like this... well, get off your high horses! After 9/11 many governments in the western world had nothing better to do than to follow the examples set in the US and to willingly, even eagerly follow along with it. Because the very same people that passed those laws in the US also exist in other countries, of course. The same would happen again.

This is truly an issue affecting all of us.

Other related posts:
Censorship in New Zealand: Wide-spread public brain-wash
Blackout to demonstrate against S92A
Section 92A (three strikes law) is not a New Zealand novelty








Comment by Mark, on 7-Aug-2008 08:34

In 2007 DHS (Department of homeland security) staged a hack that caused generators, similar to generators used in nuclear facilities, to "self destruct".

Staged cyber attack reveals vulnerability in power grid

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/27/1229230

A nuclear disaster caused by a cyber-attack would be all the reason needed to tighten restrictions on the internet.


Comment by Darth Chaos, on 10-Aug-2008 04:39

They could also use an i-9/11 and an i-PATRIOT Act as an excuse to ban any software which COULD be used to commit acts of cyberterrorism. There are some people who think "cyberterrorists" - whomever they are - use free open-source software including GNU/Linux. So it's entirely plausible that the government could ban the use and distribution and availability of GNU/Linux for "being a cyberterrorist weapon".


Add a comment

Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted. E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.

Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and placed in the moderation queue for the blog owner's approval.

Your name:

Your e-mail:

Your webpage:

foobar's profile

 
New Zealand


  • Who I am: Software developer and consultant.
  • What I do: System level programming, Linux/Unix. C, C++, Java, Python, and a long time ago even Assembler.
  • What I like: I'm a big fan of free and open source software. I'm Windows-free, running Ubuntu on my laptop. To a somewhat lesser degree, I also follow the SaaS industry.
  • Where I have been: Here and there, all over the place.




Google Search


Recent posts

Attack on net neutrality right...
Munich already saved millions ...
Iceland's public administratio...
More Apple madness (follow up)...
Apple demonstrates: With great...
Smooth sailing with the Karmic...
Censorship in New Zealand: Wid...
Image roll-over effects withou...
How about: Three strikes and Y...
UK government supports open so...


Top 10

How to write a Linux virus in ...
(11-Feb-2009 06:33, 458063 views)
Follow up: How to write a Linu...
(12-Feb-2009 08:10, 64366 views)
A truly light-weight OS: Writt...
(3-Feb-2009 10:39, 46498 views)
The 'Verified by Visa' fiasco ...
(20-Jun-2008 09:59, 32270 views)
EEE PC with XP is cheaper than...
(9-May-2008 06:50, 20205 views)
11 reasons to switch to Linux...
(4-Feb-2009 09:24, 20118 views)
Would you use Google App Engin...
(8-Apr-2008 20:02, 19400 views)
Censorship in New Zealand: Wid...
(16-Jul-2009 12:11, 18849 views)
Django Plugables: Tons of plug...
(11-Apr-2008 03:24, 16799 views)
Slow file copy bug in Vista: A...
(21-Dec-2007 12:18, 15929 views)