Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.



2375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 57

Trusted

Topic # 95755 12-Jan-2012 10:25 Send private message

Hi all,

I'm helping a friend to find a TV and thought it might be worth getting opinions on here.

Here's what he's looking for:

Price: Under $1000
Size: 40-42" (If 50" is cheap enough will be considered)
Prefers LED then Plasma or CCFL LCD

Cheers





Current Devices: HTC One
Old Devices: SGS I9000, HTC Sensation, SGSII I9100, Asus Transformer, Samsung Galaxy S3

Consultant @ProvokeZoo

All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 567786 12-Jan-2012 10:35 Send private message

Samsung UA40D5000, $949 from Dick Smith

LED, very slim and very good on power. The panel isn't as good as the 6 series or 6600/7 series

But it's still a great TV for the price




I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

1451 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 208


  Reply # 567810 12-Jan-2012 11:12 Send private message

Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.





Artificial intelligence is no match, for natural stupidity



2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 567811 12-Jan-2012 11:14 Send private message

scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Yeah that's true, if it's for movies/blu-ray or TV, then Plasma,  gaming then LCD
 




I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

92 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 567820 12-Jan-2012 11:40 Send private message

scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Most (if not all) plasmas at $1,000 and below have a screen resolution of 1024 x 768. How do these compare with the 1366 x 768 and 1920 x 1080 LCD/LED sets?

I don't think that there are many LCD/LED's at 1920x1080 screen resolution in the sub-$1,000 price range anyway. 

294 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 43


  Reply # 567876 12-Jan-2012 13:08 Send private message

pgs2050:
scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Most (if not all) plasmas at $1,000 and below have a screen resolution of 1024 x 768. How do these compare with the 1366 x 768 and 1920 x 1080 LCD/LED sets? 


Pretty well at "kiwi lounge" viewing distances.  I'd also take a 720p 50" plasma over a 40" 1080p LCD unless it was for a very small room.

1451 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 208


  Reply # 567905 12-Jan-2012 13:36 Send private message

pgs2050:
scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Most (if not all) plasmas at $1,000 and below have a screen resolution of 1024 x 768. How do these compare with the 1366 x 768 and 1920 x 1080 LCD/LED sets?

I don't think that there are many LCD/LED's at 1920x1080 screen resolution in the sub-$1,000 price range anyway. 


I have both the above highlighted models, and would watch the lower resolution (larger screen) plasma any day.  Statistics sometimes just don't add up in the real world.  

There may be other reasons why the OP's friend wants an LCD or a smaller TV, but without any further details it's hard to put a full opinion in.

 

 




Artificial intelligence is no match, for natural stupidity



376 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 567912 12-Jan-2012 13:40 Send private message

Panasonic U series plasma, Samsung series 5 LED, Sony CX LCD




  • Yamaha RXV657 A/V Reciever.
  • HAUPPAUGE HVR2200
  • ASUS P5K PRO INTEL P35
  • NVIDIA GT430 1GB - Running latest drivers
  • TH-42PY800 Full HD 100Hz Panasonic Plasma
  • Logitech Harmony One 
  • Windows 7 x64 SP1
  • MediaPortal 1.5

1007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Subscriber

  Reply # 568026 12-Jan-2012 16:55 Send private message

Has anyone been able to compare plasma with full array LED LCD? I presume everyone is comparing edge-lit LED LCD with plasma.
A bit OT I know, since full array LED-LCD are unlikely to be available for less than $1000.
Even further OT, I wonder if/when we will get consumer LED TVs. THEY will blow plasma out of the water. I did a quick search and didn't find any. Perhaps when OLEDs improve further.

I actually had to make the same choice when we bought our TV a year ago: 'HD' Plasma (1024x768?) for $800 or Full HD CCFL LCD for $880. I chose the LCD (was from Dick Smith incidently). I think I would never have been satisfied with something less than Full HD, even though the plasma probably would have looked great too.

6991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 568059 12-Jan-2012 18:19 Send private message

pgs2050:
scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Most (if not all) plasmas at $1,000 and below have a screen resolution of 1024 x 768. How do these compare with the 1366 x 768 and 1920 x 1080 LCD/LED sets?

I don't think that there are many LCD/LED's at 1920x1080 screen resolution in the sub-$1,000 price range anyway.?


The sony ex520 40 inch LED has been down to that, especially when a store has 20% off. DSE had them for 999 at one stage over xmas. Very nice screen too, it is simailr to the ex720, but doesn't have 3d or 100hz. I turn the 100hz off anyway, and it makes the picture look like it was shot on a home movie camera, and I find motion blur on 40 inch and smaller screens not too bad. PS. I would definitely get LED, as they should last longer due to using LEDs over CFLs. They use less power and don't get as hot, as well as a thinner screen, and possibly better colour reproduction. In another year there won't be too many CFL screens, and they will look like old technology, if they don't already

699 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 14


  Reply # 568560 13-Jan-2012 18:31 Send private message

I wouldn't tolerate 50Hz on a 42" LCD. I'm not a fan of the soap opera effect but I find seeing each frame jerk during pans to be worse.

The P42U30Z 1080p plasma is available for under $1000. But being a low end model it isn't very good at handling glare in a well lit environment.

$1000 and under is mostly in the "budget" section of the market.

6991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 568563 13-Jan-2012 18:35 Send private message

bfginger: I wouldn't tolerate 50Hz on a 42" LCD. I'm not a fan of the soap opera effect but I find seeing each frame jerk during pans to be worse.

The P42U30Z 1080p plasma is available for under $1000. But being a low end model it isn't very good at handling glare in a well lit environment.

$1000 and under is mostly in the "budget" section of the market.


I don't notice it on 40 inch or less, but I do notice it on larger lcd displays. I think the newer panels are better at handling it anyway. I've got an old 19 inch sony LCD tv and it is terrible with pans.

59 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 572943 24-Jan-2012 20:28 Send private message

Skolink: Has anyone been able to compare plasma with full array LED LCD? I presume everyone is comparing edge-lit LED LCD with plasma.
A bit OT I know, since full array LED-LCD are unlikely to be available for less than $1000.
Even further OT, I wonder if/when we will get consumer LED TVs. THEY will blow plasma out of the water. I did a quick search and didn't find any. Perhaps when OLEDs improve further.

I actually had to make the same choice when we bought our TV a year ago: 'HD' Plasma (1024x768?) for $800 or Full HD CCFL LCD for $880. I chose the LCD (was from Dick Smith incidently). I think I would never have been satisfied with something less than Full HD, even though the plasma probably would have looked great too.



By full array LED LCD I assume you don't mean LED back-lit?


I have a back-lit TV (Sony 55HX925) which has an awesome picture on centre. Blacks are black, motion is perfect and I have no complaints (apart from the price!)


If you're talking about the old RGB LED back-lit screens then I can't comment (I own a 40X4500 which unfortunately is not RGB LED back-lit).

Interestingly Sony has released details about "Crystal LED" which would be interesting to follow into next year (possibly).

As for a budget TV, I'd look at the Panny U series, 42" full HD at less than $1k, can't be too bad!  

 

6991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 572954 24-Jan-2012 20:46 Send private message

Wait 3-5 years and I guess we will see 40 inch OLED tvs, which out perform both plasma and LED/LCD in virtually every area, except perhaps their lifetime. Although the colours are pretty intense on them.

431 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  Reply # 572961 24-Jan-2012 21:10 Send private message

vinnieg:
scuwp: Why not plasma? If I had the choice between a 50" plasma and a 40" LCD the plasma would win hands down. See them all the time for around $1000, and the picture quality will blow any LCD out the window, especially at that price point.



Yeah that's true, if it's for movies/blu-ray or TV, then Plasma, ?gaming then LCD
?


What's the rational behind lcds are better for gaming?

59 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 572973 24-Jan-2012 21:44 Send private message

Less likely to get screen burn-in or image retention.  Having said that, you'd have to be pulling some serious hours of non-stop gaming with a hud/static graphics now days to cause permanent damage.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Vodafone TV multicast settings on pfSense?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by chrispchikin on 22-Aug-2014 22:36 (133 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


CGA. Is it fair?
Created by BTR, last reply by bazzer on 22-Aug-2014 11:02 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Warning about Pure Hosting
Created by LostBoyNZ, last reply by MichaelNZ on 23-Aug-2014 19:19 (43 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Lightbox press event release
Created by freitasm, last reply by Lightbox on 22-Aug-2014 17:04 (469 replies)
Pages... 30 31 32


It was hardly 'hacking' was it?
Created by CB_24, last reply by gzt on 21-Aug-2014 22:26 (97 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Free: Smart Button for your Android device
Created by freitasm, last reply by BigHammer on 23-Aug-2014 19:04 (111 replies)
Pages... 6 7 8


Vodafone are actually a joke.
Created by tehgerbil, last reply by KiwiNZ on 23-Aug-2014 15:33 (18 replies)
Pages... 2


Vodafone now charging you to receive a bill via post
Created by stocksp, last reply by Linuxluver on 22-Aug-2014 19:45 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.