Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
1139 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 336155 29-May-2010 22:39 Send private message

rayonline: If they do make it 256k or 512k when you go over your limit. Then I guess the other plans would need to happen too ......


Not necessarily.  It could be a perk for the higher priced plans.





Sometimes what you don't get it a blessing in disguise!

542 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 337910 3-Jun-2010 16:13 Send private message

My suggestion isn't as sexy as what others have proposed; what I'd like to see is the plans bumped up by 20gb each, and the see blocks of traffic sold in the same way that Snap Internet sells it:

  

If they did that then I'd be a happy lad if they did that, nothing particular special, just some minor adjustments here and there would make me happy. 




MacBook Pro 13.3" Mid-2012; iMac 3.4Ghz 27-inch (BTO) Late-2012; iPhone 5S 'Space Grey' (64GB), Huawei HD659b


42 posts

Geek


  Reply # 337914 3-Jun-2010 16:19 Send private message

kawaii: My suggestion isn't as sexy as what others have proposed; what I'd like to see is the plans bumped up by 20gb each, and the see blocks of traffic sold in the same way that Snap Internet sells it:

  

If they did that then I'd be a happy lad if they did that, nothing particular special, just some minor adjustments here and there would make me happy. 


It would be nice if there was actually a per GB price difference between 1GB, 2.5GB, 5GB, and 10GB blocks though.

95 posts

Master Geek

Trusted
flashcards.co.nz

  Reply # 337915 3-Jun-2010 16:19 Send private message

Sadly Telecom do not seem in a hurry to release info on the plans they are considering...

542 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 337916 3-Jun-2010 16:24 Send private message

SauronJones: 

It would be nice if there was actually a per GB price difference between 1GB, 2.5GB, 5GB, and 10GB blocks though.


I don't think there would be a price difference between the difference is so small it isn't worth passing along the savings.  I'm sure given Telecom's position they can offer a better break down cost than what Snap has - who are considerably smaller. What I'd also like to see is for all the ISP's to get together and setup a couple of data centres in New Zealand that host international content such as downloads from Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Steam and so forth. Pool all their resources together, set it up and automatically resolve customers directly to the data centre rather than sourcing it from overseas.




MacBook Pro 13.3" Mid-2012; iMac 3.4Ghz 27-inch (BTO) Late-2012; iPhone 5S 'Space Grey' (64GB), Huawei HD659b


1139 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 337925 3-Jun-2010 16:47 Send private message

kawaii: What I'd also like to see is for all the ISP's to get together and setup a couple of data centres in New Zealand that host international content such as downloads from Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Steam and so forth. Pool all their resources together, set it up and automatically resolve customers directly to the data centre rather than sourcing it from overseas.


It would be too much effort.  Someone already posted about ISPs sharing resources to bring prices down.  Something I hope Telecom takes in to account when drafting this new plan.  That is if they are making a new one, or at least changing their old ones.  I doubt anyone will be willing to set up a whole data center for storing stuff they get paid for us to download at the more expensive price.






Sometimes what you don't get it a blessing in disguise!

281 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 337930 3-Jun-2010 16:50 Send private message

Most ISP's already have Akamai caches that serve most of the stuff mentioned in there.

A Steam server is a good idea though.

542 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 337931 3-Jun-2010 16:51 Send private message

DravidDavid:
kawaii: What I'd also like to see is for all the ISP's to get together and setup a couple of data centres in New Zealand that host international content such as downloads from Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Steam and so forth. Pool all their resources together, set it up and automatically resolve customers directly to the data centre rather than sourcing it from overseas.


It would be too much effort.  Someone already posted about ISPs sharing resources to bring prices down.  Something I hope Telecom takes in to account when drafting this new plan.  That is if they are making a new one, or at least changing their old ones.  I doubt anyone will be willing to set up a whole data center for storing stuff they get paid for us to download at the more expensive price.



That 'someone' would be all the ISP's  getting together and sharing the cost.

Dear god, I wonder why I sometimes even bother when people don't even read the posts and comprehend them properly. 




MacBook Pro 13.3" Mid-2012; iMac 3.4Ghz 27-inch (BTO) Late-2012; iPhone 5S 'Space Grey' (64GB), Huawei HD659b


1039 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 119

Subscriber

  Reply # 337936 3-Jun-2010 16:55 Send private message

I want to see Telecom selling bandwidth with a minimal markup. Every thing I've ever heard or read suggests the cost to Telecom of bandwidth from SCC is around 53-54 cents/gb. I see no reason why they should not be selling that to me at cost+20%.

That doesnt even being to take into account the fact that SCC (controlled by Telecom lets not forget) traffic is by all accounts horribly overpriced and they could afford to drop it substantially. But thats a diffrent story.

I think it's perfectly reasonable for Telecom to look at offering a BT replacement along these lines:

$60pm, FS/FS, 100gb cap, and overage at 65-100cents per GB. Unless what I've read re the costs involved in this are way off base, this would still provide a profit for telecom, and be acceptable to the majority of former BT users. Admittedly it probably wouldnt be a high margin profit, but it would still be a profit.

For legal purposes, I gift the idea of this plan to Telecom without any expectation of monetary compensation.

95 posts

Master Geek

Trusted
flashcards.co.nz

  Reply # 337938 3-Jun-2010 17:00 Send private message

Lias: I want to see Telecom selling bandwidth with a minimal markup. Every thing I've ever heard or read suggests the cost to Telecom of bandwidth from SCC is around 53-54 cents/gb. I see no reason why they should not be selling that to me at cost+20%.

That doesnt even being to take into account the fact that SCC (controlled by Telecom lets not forget) traffic is by all accounts horribly overpriced and they could afford to drop it substantially. But thats a diffrent story.

I think it's perfectly reasonable for Telecom to look at offering a BT replacement along these lines:

$60pm, FS/FS, 100gb cap, and overage at 65-100cents per GB. Unless what I've read re the costs involved in this are way off base, this would still provide a profit for telecom, and be acceptable to the majority of former BT users. Admittedly it probably wouldnt be a high margin profit, but it would still be a profit.

For legal purposes, I gift the idea of this plan to Telecom without any expectation of monetary compensation.


That is a DREAM plan, one I'd go for but one which I feel that sadly, Telecom will not...

Look everyone knows Telecom is horrifically profitable but they MUST (by law) maximise shareholder value. So, maximum customer value does not always equate to maximum shareholder value. That is the crux of the issue. Oh and the aforemetioned monopoly issues around Telecom.

534 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 337944 3-Jun-2010 17:20 Send private message

I'd be happy with something plain and simple as $1.00 per gigabyte, only pay for what you use at a speed of FS/128 or FS/256

281 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 337962 3-Jun-2010 18:08 Send private message

Lias:
$60pm, FS/FS, 100gb cap, and overage at 65-100cents per GB. Unless what I've read re the costs involved in this are way off base, this would still provide a profit for telecom, and be acceptable to the majority of former BT users. Admittedly it probably wouldnt be a high margin profit, but it would still be a profit.


$~20 - UBA Port costs (regulated price set by Government)
$~10 - Support and overheads (and thats a wet finger in the air number)
$~55 (at your estimate of bandwidth cost, ignores all other transport and backhaul costs nationally)

Plan cost to the ISP - Something like $85
Price you suggested - $60 (-$8ish for GST) so $52 for the ISP.

$33 a month loss for the ISP


534 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 337963 3-Jun-2010 18:14 Send private message

So a $100 plan for 100 gig a month would give them a nice profit as also a lot of the people on it might not even use 50% of the 100gig ?

I'd pay $100 for 100 gig a month even if it was shaped the same as BT is now..

281 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 337979 3-Jun-2010 18:38 Send private message

cafeg: So a $100 plan for 100 gig a month would give them a nice profit as also a lot of the people on it might not even use 50% of the 100gig ?


Thats where the bandwidth game must get interesting, as you need to buy enough GB/s capacity to make sure that users never hit a bottleneck, but at the same time not increase your costs too much.

Also bear in mind the pulled-out-of-thin-air nature of the support costs, $10 might be light when you consider all the associated collateral that an ISP has to run (national backhaul and interconnect, DNS, LNS and associated switching, helpdesk support, Network Ops, marketing and sales, amortized "free" install costs and CPE costs etc. etc. ).

To put it in a bit more context, the $100 you are happy to pay is only $87 to the ISP (with GST at 15%) so they could be making $2 profit per customer and employing hundreds of people to do so.

Also we are reaching in saying that Telecom pays 50-60c per GB in bandwidth, $1/GB is probably a much more conservative figure.

494 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 9


  Reply # 338041 3-Jun-2010 20:44 Send private message

As at Oct 2009 - NBR says "The new Southern Cross price for 5Gbit/s of restored capacity represents around US$0.28 per gigabyte downloaded from the US"

This is onsold to middle men (pacnet, Telecom, etc) to onsell to ISP's. My guess would be that ISP's are paying less then $1nz a GB. See http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/chris-keall/decoding-southern-cross-cable-s-price-cuts

We shouldn't want to pay more for less data, Slingshot can offer 50GB data for $50 and if you don't use it all you keep it for next month, not to mention the free data in the wee dark hours, Telecom were offering unlimited for $59 a month, The reason given for stopping bigtime was the a small group of people bypassing shaping and downloading close to 1TB of data a month.

From that I think we can assume unlimited data is possible if shaping is robust and not able to be bypassed. Unfortunately Telecom couldn't get the shaping to work right. You can also assume we are being ripped of when it comes to data costs anyone asking more than a $1 a GB is laughing all the way to the bank.

A fair thing for Telecom to do would be to introduce a fair use policy, how this is made up or what limits are in place is for telecom to decide. They want people to download off peak so make that known in the policy.

Whatever happens I will be moving from Telecom as 40GB is not enough and $2 a GB is a joke. 60GB and $1 a GB would be promising, but still missing the mark as competitors offer better.




Home Server: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, AMD FX-6100, 16GB RAM, 17TB, UPS, 2 x HP P410/256 8 Ports SAS/SATA, 3 x Norco SS-500,  ESXi 5.5u1, WHS 2011 (16TB HDD), W2K12 for Unifi.
Media Center: Silverstone GD01, AMD A6-3600, Asus F1A75-M PRO, 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws-X 1866, 120GB Samsung EVO Pro + 750GB WD7500BPK HDD, APC UPS, DVB-T AVerTV TwinStar HD, HD Homerun, Blu-ray player, Windows 8.1 with MCE, MediaBrowser3, Freeview HD, LG 55LA6230.
Kids Media Center: Gigabyte Brix 3227, 120GB mSATA SSD, 4GB Ram, HD Homerun, Windows 8.1 with MCE, MediaBrowser3, Sony KDL40W4000 iDTV.
Main PC: Intel C2Q 2.5Ghz, 8GB RAM, NVidia GTX760, 90GB OCZ Agility 3, 750GB WD7500BPK HDD, 2 x 24" Panasonic LCD TV, Blu-ray drive, Windows 8.1 with MCE, Mediabrowser3, HD Homerun.
House: 100/50 UFB, ONT to Router in Garage, Router to 16p switch and voice line, 16 x CAT6 Ethernet ports in house. Unifi Wifi.

1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

MH 17 "shot down" all dead
Created by joker97, last reply by turnin on 22-Jul-2014 16:56 (196 replies)
Pages... 12 13 14


PB Computers experiences
Created by KiwiNZ, last reply by 1cloud on 23-Jul-2014 21:13 (30 replies)
Pages... 2


Geekzone giveaway: Thecus N2310 NAS
Created by freitasm, last reply by riahon on 24-Jul-2014 04:53 (48 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Huge Fuss, didn't even make it a year.
Created by networkn, last reply by Glassboy on 22-Jul-2014 19:50 (121 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


Skinny's new aggressive ad campaign
Created by Yabanize, last reply by Yabanize on 22-Jul-2014 23:35 (52 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Is working in IT making you less manly?
Created by dotnetdev, last reply by k1wi on 24-Jul-2014 02:26 (23 replies)
Pages... 2


Problem with packet loss and ping on international traffic
Created by yankstar, last reply by yankstar on 23-Jul-2014 21:48 (11 replies)

Those were the days......Xtra Jetstream plans 10 yrs ago
Created by clinty, last reply by Jarsky on 23-Jul-2014 15:25 (35 replies)
Pages... 2 3



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.