Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Buying anything on Amazon? Please use the Geekzone Amazon aff link.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 

LAC

103 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 473731 24-May-2011 22:40 Send private message

Isn't this fibre doing to be different as in right to your door step?

1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 112

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473733 24-May-2011 22:45 Send private message

marmel:
nickb800:
marmel:

Seems crazy to have two fibre networks installed in some areas. Competition though I suppose?


Whererabouts will have two fibre networks?

Both TCL an TCOM have FTTN in some areas, but FTTH/P isnt going to be duplicated


Thats what I am talking about, utilising the exisiting fibre where it has already been laid even if it is only FTTN as you have pointed out.  


Given that every street in urban areas will have to be dug up/micro trenched anyway and fibre for a whole town can be served directly from the one central exchange, the few strands of fibre that make up the FTTN network are pretty much redundant. Even if they decide to serve the fibre from cabinets spread around a town/city, they will be digging up all the roads anyway so theres no advantage in already having fibre in place (assuming here that the cost of fibre is small relative to the cost of the civil works for laying it)

1381 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 30

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473735 24-May-2011 22:46 Send private message

nickb800:
marmel:
nickb800:
marmel:

Seems crazy to have two fibre networks installed in some areas. Competition though I suppose?


Whererabouts will have two fibre networks?

Both TCL an TCOM have FTTN in some areas, but FTTH/P isnt going to be duplicated


Thats what I am talking about, utilising the exisiting fibre where it has already been laid even if it is only FTTN as you have pointed out.  


Given that every street in urban areas will have to be dug up/micro trenched anyway and fibre for a whole town can be served directly from the one central exchange, the few strands of fibre that make up the FTTN network are pretty much redundant. Even if they decide to serve the fibre from cabinets spread around a town/city, they will be digging up all the roads anyway so theres no advantage in already having fibre in place (assuming here that the cost of fibre is small relative to the cost of the civil works for laying it)


Ok thanks for clarifying that.


Now I asked earlier about a new house build and what cables should be run from the telecom box to the dwelling? Cat 6 or will it need to be fibre now?   

1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 112

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473737 24-May-2011 22:52 Send private message

marmel:
nickb800:
marmel:
nickb800:
marmel:

Seems crazy to have two fibre networks installed in some areas. Competition though I suppose?


Whererabouts will have two fibre networks?

Both TCL an TCOM have FTTN in some areas, but FTTH/P isnt going to be duplicated


Thats what I am talking about, utilising the exisiting fibre where it has already been laid even if it is only FTTN as you have pointed out.  


Given that every street in urban areas will have to be dug up/micro trenched anyway and fibre for a whole town can be served directly from the one central exchange, the few strands of fibre that make up the FTTN network are pretty much redundant. Even if they decide to serve the fibre from cabinets spread around a town/city, they will be digging up all the roads anyway so theres no advantage in already having fibre in place (assuming here that the cost of fibre is small relative to the cost of the civil works for laying it)


Ok thanks for clarifying that.


Now I asked earlier about a new house build and what cables should be run from the telecom box to the dwelling? Cat 6 or will it need to be fibre now?   


Just follow the current telecom standards when you install the ducting from street to your house, and chuck a regular underground rated cat3 phone cable in there. When chorus figure out what they want to do, its up to them to install the fibre, which they will run into an ONT inside your house. The only thing you really need to do to future proof is run several runs of cat5e or cat 6 as well as RG6 from the ETP to your central distribution hub

20063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1667

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 473773 25-May-2011 06:27 Send private message

nickb800:
marmel:
nickb800:
marmel:

Seems crazy to have two fibre networks installed in some areas. Competition though I suppose?


Whererabouts will have two fibre networks?

Both TCL an TCOM have FTTN in some areas, but FTTH/P isnt going to be duplicated


Thats what I am talking about, utilising the exisiting fibre where it has already been laid even if it is only FTTN as you have pointed out.  


Given that every street in urban areas will have to be dug up/micro trenched anyway and fibre for a whole town can be served directly from the one central exchange, the few strands of fibre that make up the FTTN network are pretty much redundant. Even if they decide to serve the fibre from cabinets spread around a town/city, they will be digging up all the roads anyway so theres no advantage in already having fibre in place (assuming here that the cost of fibre is small relative to the cost of the civil works for laying it)


The existing FTTN infrastructure is a key component of FTTH deployments in areas where Telecom will be deploying the network. These cabinets were designed with FTTH in mind and have the baulhaul in place already to support this. The main work required will be the GPON network from the existing cabinets to the home which will require trenching or overhead cables.


16 posts

Geek


  Reply # 473777 25-May-2011 07:25 Send private message

Just a quick question here.
I've only really been following this with half a mind, but I'm shortly to be employed again by one of the telco's, so am bound to be peppered with questions about this over the coming months, so I'd like to get my head screwed on right about this split.

I'm glad someone mentioned further up saying that it was a win for chorus, not a win for telecom.  All the newspaper articles I've read are highlighting telecom as the big winner here, which made me incredibly confused.
Am I correct in saying that the government is giving the 900odd million to CHORUS when it is a seperate entity, and not to telecom?

Also, as one company is still holding the fibre and copper network, this is still a monopoly in my eyes.  Whats to restrict chrous from holding the country to similar pricing ransom that telecom is currently?
I'd assume this is government regulation, and the fact that Chorus doesn't have a retail arm removes any bias to a singular telecommunications company, but I just wanted to ask the question anyway.

I was listening to talkback last night on the issue and one of the people interviewed (for the life of me I can't remember what company he was for, but it was something Internet New Zealand), was suggesting the wholesale price for fibre was going to be identical to copper, as set out by the contract.  Due to this NZ is going to enter the market with relatively low prices, but will see only a small drop in prices over the coming years when comparing to overseas countries.  Just something to keep in mind in 10 years time when we start to compare NZ to prices around the world.
But does this also mean a retail user, on rollout, should in effect pay similar prices to current broadband prices?  Obviously there will be a slight premium on top due to high speed, but I've got hopes that we are going to see competition in play and not see ridiculous roll out prices.

Anyway, a couple of questions above.


Tl;DR, questions below
 Whats to restrict chrous from holding the country to similar pricing ransom that telecom is currently?

 Am I correct in saying that the government is giving the 900odd million to CHORUS when it is a seperate entity, and not to telecom?

does this also mean a retail user, on rollout, should in effect pay similar prices to current broadband prices? 

281 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 473790 25-May-2011 08:52 Send private message

GuessX:

Tl;DR, questions below
 Whats to restrict chrous from holding the country to similar pricing ransom that telecom is currently?


Contractually UFB has a price ceiling (the $40 being bandied about) which Chorus or any other CFH Participant won't be able to raise prices above. Not sure what you mean by Telecom having a pricing ransom already, the UBA prices are controlled/regulated by ComCom, not Telecom.

 
GuessX: Am I correct in saying that the government is giving the 900odd million to CHORUS when it is a seperate entity, and not to telecom?


As far as I'm aware thats correct, although I'm sure there are arcane accounting arts involved around balancing debts as part of Separation which provide benefits to both new entities.

GuessX: does this also mean a retail user, on rollout, should in effect pay similar prices to current broadband prices? 


The headline $40 Wholesale price is cheaper than the current naked UBA prices, significantly cheaper than the EUBA products with guarenteed channels (also cheaper than clothed UBA + POT's).

16 posts

Geek


  Reply # 473811 25-May-2011 09:48 Send private message

Cheers for that.

What I meant by telecom holding to ransom was probably a little unfair.

I know they fight the comcom all the way on any sort of changes (the split included).
It kind of just gives me the impression they are saying 'These are my toys, I shouldn't have to share them if I don't want to'.

I'd probably be the same, afterall, they have their shareholders to look after.



95 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 473845 25-May-2011 11:23 Send private message

Wait, What?

How are they now fighting the concom on the split?!

That CAME from Telecom should they win their UFB tenders, if they didn't, they didn't have to split. (Though to be honest, I think they should have wether they did or didn't just to shut the rest of the retailers up about them having their network but that's probably a whole other debate)

I look forward to seeing how the Telco landscape changes in the future to be honest.


3033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 215

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473849 25-May-2011 11:38 Send private message

Does the UFB include any work for open access national backhaul fibre? I realize Telecom already has this (alongside other companies like FX, Telstra, Kordia etc.) so will this be transferred to Chorus2?

While bandwidth from the consumer to the handover seems pretty clear cut in terms of price what kind of costs should ISP's be looking at for example to get traffic from Invercargill to Auckland for APE or international transit?





1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 112

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473852 25-May-2011 11:41 Send private message

Zeon: Does the UFB include any work for open access national backhaul fibre? I realize Telecom already has this (alongside other companies like FX, Telstra, Kordia etc.) so will this be transferred to Chorus2?

While bandwidth from the consumer to the handover seems pretty clear cut in terms of price what kind of costs should ISP's be looking at for example to get traffic from Invercargill to Auckland for APE or international transit?


My understanding is that backhaul will go to Telecom Wholesale, as this would eventually place the new Telecom in a similar position to Telstra - reselling the last mile, delivering backhaul over their own network.

Good point about Kordia - with the high court ruling allowing them to upgrade their shared fibre network with Telstra, Kordia could become a major fibre backhaul provider

7777 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 326

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 473887 25-May-2011 12:59 Send private message

Domestic backhaul is not included in the wholesale UFB price.

In theory many regions have multiple options for back haul (vector, citylink, fx networks, kordia, telstraclear, telecom wholesale).  However getting from a customer to the ISP's core network could entail travelling through several regions.

Telstraclear and Telecom have the major end to end national fibre networks so these guys will still be the biggest players in domestic transit.

It's going to be very very very interesting and important to see what stays with Telecom and what goes into Chorus in terms of assets.

Also what I would like to see a real focus on next is: IX or peering exchanges in each LFC and then a national peering / IX framework.

We all know the two biggest ISP's Telstraclear and Telecom Retail don't peer at APE/WIX and this impacts the cost of domestic transit massively.

We need to be doing what Singapore is doing here imo:
http://www.ida.gov.sg/Infrastructure/20090708173942.aspx

Infrastructure Geek
3731 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 106

Trusted
Microsoft NZ
Subscriber

  Reply # 474065 25-May-2011 17:28 Send private message

i'm surprised at how little noise there has been after this announcement. I thought there would be a lot more people openly abusing the govt & telecom....




Technical Evangelist
Microsoft NZ
about.me/nzregs
Twitter: @nzregs


203 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 474695 27-May-2011 10:07 Send private message

GuessX:
Am I correct in saying that the government is giving the 900odd million to CHORUS when it is a seperate entity, and not to telecom?

Chorus will need to pay it all back, so technically the government is not giving them money. But the repayment date is 2045 and they don't have to pay interest.

5972 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 109

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 474889 27-May-2011 17:48 Send private message

The FTTN project where new fibre has been installed has pulled 140 core (or there abouts) to whereever it has gone and depending on the population density even more 140core cables have been pulled, plus where fibre has been layed either recently or historically its in duct so easy to pull more.

Therefore any effort in installing FTTN is directly benificial to Chorus's ability to move forward to FTTH/P

Cyril

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Netflix officialy launching in NZ in March
Created by jarj, last reply by tdgeek on 21-Nov-2014 19:08 (97 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Gull Employment Dispute.
Created by networkn, last reply by gzt on 23-Nov-2014 21:10 (69 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Which one is right for me? M8, Z3, S5 or other?
Created by makiomoto, last reply by makiomoto on 20-Nov-2014 13:52 (40 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Free 1gb data with $19 combo until end of Jan 2015 (1.5gb total)
Created by eXDee, last reply by PhantomNVD on 23-Nov-2014 21:37 (15 replies)

Slingshot line speed
Created by Frankiej45, last reply by Frankiej45 on 20-Nov-2014 14:38 (14 replies)

Little Wins labour Leadership
Created by MikeAqua, last reply by Aredwood on 21-Nov-2014 18:47 (53 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Orcon: Why did you cancel my email account without telling me??
Created by old3eyes, last reply by old3eyes on 21-Nov-2014 17:03 (13 replies)

My connection is too fast
Created by ckc, last reply by Geektastic on 20-Nov-2014 11:30 (25 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.