Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Buying anything on Amazon? Please use the Geekzone Amazon aff link.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ... | 26
464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666136 2-Aug-2012 12:58 Send private message

If I "believe" that beer is a medicine and I'm drinking it for health reasons, does that make beer a medicine?

So if you "believe" marriage is about raising a family, that's your own reason.

1008 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Subscriber

  Reply # 666138 2-Aug-2012 12:59 Send private message

kyhwana2:
Skolink: 
4. Churches which receive public funding to maintain a historical building may be pressured to.


Good, they should be pressured to do so. (Since they're taking MY taxpayers dollars)

Fair enough, I suppose they will have to make the choice.

kyhwana2:

Skolink: 
5. Shall we agree to disagree on this one? 


That just means you don't have an acceptable answer and you know it.

No, it is off topic, and would be a huge debate on its own.

I iz your trusted friend
5298 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 52

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 666139 2-Aug-2012 13:00 Send private message

mattRSK:
 No, it comes back to my belief that the purpose of marriage is to raise a family. Same sex unions are completely different and I think should not be covered under the same definition. Anyway that's my belief. What else can I say, that is how I would vote if I was in parliament. Thankyou for the respectful debate.


If a marriage to two loving couple, give them the future prospect to be able to raise a family, then that's good. BUT do not restrict the same sex couple the rights to be have that freedom in the future. They too would like one day to be able to raise a family of their own - regardless how the children come about, either by IVF, Surrogacy or adoption, the point does not matter.




Internet is my backyard...

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...» «Photo blog: I see...»

Please read the Geekzone's FUG


464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666141 2-Aug-2012 13:01 Send private message

menabassily: If I "believe" that beer is a medicine and I'm drinking it for health reasons, does that make beer a medicine?

So if you "believe" marriage is about raising a family, that's your own reason.


People marry for all sorts of different reasons, we shouldn't just deny them the right to get married because their reasons are different than ours

BDFL
50186 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4743

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 666142 2-Aug-2012 13:02 Send private message

Skolink: I think for me opposition to this law change boils down to believing that being in a homosexual relationship is wrong, and this law change is the state endorsing such relationships, encouraging people to believe that there is nothing wrong with it (those few that still think so), and encouraging people to enter into such relationships.


The State is not going to encouraging people to believe in anything, as it shouldn't.

What the State does is give the chance to each human being to believe in whatever they want to believe.

If you believe two men can't get married, that's fine. You are not being forced to get married to another man and not being forced to believe there's nothing wrong with it. However, for other people with a different mindset the State guarantees they have the same rights as you to believe in the opposite.





249 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted

  Reply # 666143 2-Aug-2012 13:03 Send private message

So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?




Michael Skyrme - Instrumentation & Controls

I iz your trusted friend
5298 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 52

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 666147 2-Aug-2012 13:06 Send private message

MikeSkyrme: So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?


It is one of the many crux that easier to bring up by either side of the issue. And almost the most obvious point to spin the debate around.




Internet is my backyard...

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...» «Photo blog: I see...»

Please read the Geekzone's FUG


249 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted

  Reply # 666148 2-Aug-2012 13:10 Send private message

chiefie:
MikeSkyrme: So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?


It is one of the many crux that easier to bring up by either side of the issue. And almost the most obvious point to spin the debate around.


Certainly not trying to spin the debate. Having skimmed through a lot of these posts, the most common theme I see is that concerning family / children.
I am merely trying to understand the entire reasoning behind the arguments.




Michael Skyrme - Instrumentation & Controls

464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666149 2-Aug-2012 13:14 Send private message

MikeSkyrme:
chiefie:
MikeSkyrme: So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?


It is one of the many crux that easier to bring up by either side of the issue. And almost the most obvious point to spin the debate around.


Certainly not trying to spin the debate. Having skimmed through a lot of these posts, the most common theme I see is that concerning family / children.
I am merely trying to understand the entire reasoning behind the arguments.


Just trying to find out what people think of the subject and its positive/negative consequence. Basically everybody agree on the consequence, but disagree on their positive/negative nature.



2352 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 123


  Reply # 666150 2-Aug-2012 13:14 Send private message

MikeSkyrme:
chiefie:
MikeSkyrme: So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?


It is one of the many crux that easier to bring up by either side of the issue. And almost the most obvious point to spin the debate around.


Certainly not trying to spin the debate. Having skimmed through a lot of these posts, the most common theme I see is that concerning family / children.
I am merely trying to understand the entire reasoning behind the arguments.


The reasoning is for same sex couples to have the right to marry like hetro couples. If the allow equal marriage then it should pave the way for adoption laws to change also to give same sex couples an equal chance of adopting a child which is not possible with current laws. Ultimately we want all the same rights, but one step at a time if need be.





2013 MacBook Air (4GB/1.3GHz i5/128GB SSD) - HP DV6 (8GB/2.8GHz i7/120GB SSD + 750GB HDD)
iPhone 5 (16GB/White/Telecom NZ) - Xperia Z C6603 (16GB/Purple/Telecom NZ)

Sam, Auckland 
Skype: tardtasticx

464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666153 2-Aug-2012 13:17 Send private message

You can also debate this live:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/7398922/Live-debate-on-marriage-equality

Update:
Labour MP Louisa Wall and Conservative Party leader Colin Craig are answering questions about the debate on marriage equality.

Awesome
4035 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 589

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 666154 2-Aug-2012 13:18 Send private message

Skolink: I think for me opposition to this law change boils down to believing that being in a homosexual relationship is wrong, and this law change is the state endorsing such relationships, encouraging people to believe that there is nothing wrong with it (those few that still think so), and encouraging people to enter into such relationships. Hopefully my other points still stand on their own though, just being honest about it.


Marriage doesn't encourage straight people into homosexual relationships in the same way it does not encourage gay people into heterosexual relationships.

Gay people will be gay, and have gay relationships regardless of marriage. The point is the status quo denies them equal recognition of their relationship in law.

You say "encouraging people to believe that there is nothing wrong with it (those few that still think so)"

The facts strongly show otherwise. The current Herald Poll has 58% of respondents in support of marriage equality. The stuff poll is at 76% support. The TVNZ poll has support at 63%. I think this fairly demonstrates that your 'few that still think so' comment is merely a projection of your own bias.





Twitter: ajobbins

249 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted

  Reply # 666155 2-Aug-2012 13:19 Send private message

tardtasticx:
MikeSkyrme:
chiefie:
MikeSkyrme: So, just to get clarification, the crux of the matter is not really anything about same sex marriage. It is about the ability for same sex couples to be able to adopt children?


It is one of the many crux that easier to bring up by either side of the issue. And almost the most obvious point to spin the debate around.


Certainly not trying to spin the debate. Having skimmed through a lot of these posts, the most common theme I see is that concerning family / children.
I am merely trying to understand the entire reasoning behind the arguments.


The reasoning is for same sex couples to have the right to marry like hetro couples. If the allow equal marriage then it should pave the way for adoption laws to change also to give same sex couples an equal chance of adopting a child which is not possible with current laws. Ultimately we want all the same rights, but one step at a time if need be.


Good response.

I do believe that the reasoning behind the fight against equal equal marriage by some, is to do with "what happens next...?"

For the record, as per my earlier post, I am not fussed either way regarding the issue.




Michael Skyrme - Instrumentation & Controls

464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666157 2-Aug-2012 13:19 Send private message

The privilege of marriage is access to the definition of spouse, which under our adoption act, entitles married couples to jointly adopt.
by Louisa Wall 12:23 PM

464 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6
Inactive user


  Reply # 666158 2-Aug-2012 13:21 Send private message

Why is marriage so important when you have a civil union?
by Chon 12:11 PM

As a social institution, it is something that all New Zealanders should have access to given the state issues licences to New Zealand citizens.
by Louisa Wall 12:12 PM

1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ... | 26
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Netflix officialy launching in NZ in March
Created by jarj, last reply by tdgeek on 21-Nov-2014 19:08 (97 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Current Netflix payment method as of Nov 14 - Cant pay
Created by andynz, last reply by Regs on 24-Nov-2014 17:00 (29 replies)
Pages... 2


Click Monday Deals
Created by mrtoken, last reply by Krishant007 on 24-Nov-2014 17:11 (25 replies)
Pages... 2


Gull Employment Dispute.
Created by networkn, last reply by sir1963 on 24-Nov-2014 17:30 (90 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Voda VDSL, Horrid offnet performance.
Created by TimA, last reply by TimA on 24-Nov-2014 20:59 (17 replies)
Pages... 2


SEO spammers
Created by freitasm, last reply by jamesrt on 24-Nov-2014 16:09 (25 replies)
Pages... 2


Free 1gb data with $19 combo until end of Jan 2015 (1.5gb total)
Created by eXDee, last reply by un1qo on 24-Nov-2014 14:51 (21 replies)
Pages... 2


SSD hard drive in aging HTPC disappointingly slow
Created by watman, last reply by joker97 on 23-Nov-2014 22:02 (20 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.