Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

Topic # 113875 30-Jan-2013 18:32 Send private message

Hi All,

I have two different subnets linked with a router between them.

I need to access a SMB share over a port forward across the WAN interface - not as bad a security threat as you might think because the WAN interface is not exposed to the internet in this case, just a different subnet.

I opened 135/137/139 and 445 TCP and UDP and cant access the share by typing in \\SERVER\Share

Am I missing something?

Cheers

-Al

Create new topic


614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 753416 30-Jan-2013 18:33 Send private message

PS: I tried making the server a DMZ and that didnt work either!



614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 753418 30-Jan-2013 18:40 Send private message

First problem : I can ping one particular device on the LAN subnet, but the SERVER with the SMB share(same subnet) wont reply to pings.

Guess thats the first problem to over come.

-AL

3016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 199

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 753447 30-Jan-2013 19:33 Send private message

Hang on, why are you using NAT at all? If the 2 subnets are directly connected via a single router than you don't even need port forwarding as one subnet can route directly to a host in the other? What devices etc. are you using and what are you trying to achieve?





1959 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 19

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 755113 3-Feb-2013 16:26 Send private message

Replace SERVER with the IP address of your router. The server behind the NAT is not visible by its name from the outside.



614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 755173 3-Feb-2013 18:49 Send private message

Yeah your right, it needs to be the IP of the router, but still doesnt work.

I wonder if it has to do with the reply address?

Here is my diagram of what I *think* might be happening?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dt7q9owe5y997ug/Drawing1%20%282%29.jpg?m

HTH

-Al



614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 755203 3-Feb-2013 20:28 Send private message

bigal_nz: Yeah your right, it needs to be the IP of the router, but still doesnt work.

I wonder if it has to do with the reply address?

Here is my diagram of what I *think* might be happening?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dt7q9owe5y997ug/Drawing1%20%282%29.jpg?m

HTH

-Al


Yip - the air router needs to change the source to 192.168.150.243 for SMB requests going across it.

iptables -t nat -o eth0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -J MASQUERADE

Or something like that!

1959 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 19

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 755338 4-Feb-2013 08:39 Send private message

What are your client and server SMB hosts. Recent (6.1 and above) windows versions do not require return path.

3016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 199

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 755364 4-Feb-2013 09:22 Send private message

Hi Bigal_nz,
OKKKKK I think you need to look at a major redesign of your network. Firstly why have you got 2x routers connecting to the internet? Have you got connections with 2 different ISPs? Unless these are seperate networks due to one being say for you and one being say your neighbour you only need one router for everything. You have double NAT going on there which is REALLY bad with the stuff behind the air router.

The answers will come from this I think!






1959 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 19

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 755373 4-Feb-2013 09:43 Send private message

I've only just looked at the diagram, honestly, left me a bit perplexed.

431 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 44


  Reply # 755388 4-Feb-2013 09:53 Send private message

I'm no expert in this particular field, but if it were me, I'd look at using a VPN over the WAN perhaps.



614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 755697 4-Feb-2013 17:48 Send private message

Zeon: Hi Bigal_nz,
OKKKKK I think you need to look at a major redesign of your network. Firstly why have you got 2x routers connecting to the internet? Have you got connections with 2 different ISPs? Unless these are seperate networks due to one being say for you and one being say your neighbour you only need one router for everything. You have double NAT going on there which is REALLY bad with the stuff behind the air router.

The answers will come from this I think!



There are reasons for doing it this way, and constrictions on what I can change and what I cant.

I guess I am fudging a solution with my hands tied to some extent.

Yes both the routers at the top of the diagram connect to the internet.

There are two different organisations involved. I only control the 192.168.150.0 subnet.

Proper routing would be best solution...but again I dont control the 192.168.0.0 network.

3016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 199

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 755712 4-Feb-2013 18:11 Send private message

bigal_nz:
Zeon: Hi Bigal_nz,
OKKKKK I think you need to look at a major redesign of your network. Firstly why have you got 2x routers connecting to the internet? Have you got connections with 2 different ISPs? Unless these are seperate networks due to one being say for you and one being say your neighbour you only need one router for everything. You have double NAT going on there which is REALLY bad with the stuff behind the air router.

The answers will come from this I think!



There are reasons for doing it this way, and constrictions on what I can change and what I cant.

I guess I am fudging a solution with my hands tied to some extent.

Yes both the routers at the top of the diagram connect to the internet.

There are two different organisations involved. I only control the 192.168.150.0 subnet.

Proper routing would be best solution...but again I dont control the 192.168.0.0 network.



Hmm I see. Would it be an option to perhaps connect router2 to router1? Can we get some mroe info on the situation and your limitations? Don't need to name names of course ;p





1165 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 54

Subscriber

  Reply # 755729 4-Feb-2013 18:48 Send private message

So you have a static route on Router 1 (192.168.150.1)??

192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 gw=192.168.150.243




Ross
ADSL2+ sync (Kbps): 11577/945, attenuation (dB): 33.0/16.9, Noise margin (dB): 11.5/11.5



614 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 756766 7-Feb-2013 04:11 Send private message

Zeon:
bigal_nz:
Zeon: Hi Bigal_nz,
OKKKKK I think you need to look at a major redesign of your network. Firstly why have you got 2x routers connecting to the internet? Have you got connections with 2 different ISPs? Unless these are seperate networks due to one being say for you and one being say your neighbour you only need one router for everything. You have double NAT going on there which is REALLY bad with the stuff behind the air router.

The answers will come from this I think!



There are reasons for doing it this way, and constrictions on what I can change and what I cant.

I guess I am fudging a solution with my hands tied to some extent.

Yes both the routers at the top of the diagram connect to the internet.

There are two different organisations involved. I only control the 192.168.150.0 subnet.

Proper routing would be best solution...but again I dont control the 192.168.0.0 network.



Hmm I see. Would it be an option to perhaps connect router2 to router1? Can we get some mroe info on the situation and your limitations? Don't need to name names of course ;p


Dont worry the iptables rule to do SNAT fixed it, so it had a return path:

iptables -t NAT -A POSTROUING -o br0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.150.243

Giving the packs a return address of 192.168.150.243 when crossing the Air Router.

Cheers

-Al


Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

How good is your general Science Knowledge?
Created by Aredwood, last reply by joker97 on 31-Oct-2014 23:44 (39 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Government Limos
Created by networkn, last reply by Bung on 31-Oct-2014 12:39 (94 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Snap refuses to replace faulty gear
Created by Brendan, last reply by MadEngineer on 28-Oct-2014 19:07 (92 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Sky will be 'upgrading software' of My Sky to connect to internet. What does that mean?
Created by Geektastic, last reply by NonprayingMantis on 31-Oct-2014 23:55 (27 replies)
Pages... 2


Shutup and take my money (via NFC on my mobile phone)
Created by sxz, last reply by sonyxperiageek on 31-Oct-2014 22:34 (24 replies)
Pages... 2


Uber: a cheaper taxi ride?
Created by kingdragonfly, last reply by livisun on 31-Oct-2014 14:47 (34 replies)
Pages... 2 3


OneDrive code giveaway - go!
Created by freitasm, last reply by pgsheng on 1-Nov-2014 01:50 (33 replies)
Pages... 2 3


DDos Protection from ISP
Created by charsleysa, last reply by freitasm on 31-Oct-2014 12:11 (46 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.