Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
7189 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 397


  Reply # 563865 2-Jan-2012 21:56 Send private message

deepred: Wouldn't the Commerce Commission be taking an interest in this? It's the equivalent of the Beeb selling out to Murdoch, or PBS/NPR doing the same with FOX.

SKY will never see a cent of my dosh, not because I'm a tight bastard, but because I object to the Orwellisation of broadcasting in NZ.


I would hope so. There s definitely a lack of competition in the TV content area IMHO.

1117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 70


  Reply # 563869 2-Jan-2012 22:02 Send private message

maybe now there's enough bandwidth for HD transmissions on the satellite now (I know wishfull thinking)




Asus Crosshair V Formula AMD FX8320, 8GB Corsair Vengence LP, 2X Sapphire Radeon HD7850 2GB 1000/1300, 1x WesternDigital WD2500AAJS 7200rpm 8MB cache SATAII , 1x Samsung spinpoin F1 HD502IJ 1x storage mode, 2x Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD502IJ RAID0 Boot, 1x Pioneer DVR212s 18x DVDRW, SilverStone ST75F-P (750W) Full Modular PSU, OS WIN7 x64 ultimate SP1 (7601), SilverStone RaVeN RV02B-W (with USB3.0 upgrade)

201 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted
Dish TV

  Reply # 563955 3-Jan-2012 11:13 Send private message

Athlonite: maybe now there's enough bandwidth for HD transmissions on the satellite now (I know wishfull thinking)


Not a good idea because not many people have access to HD Content as they need a High definition capable receiver, These cost from $500 + including using the HDMI cable no one cant afford this. 

 




______________________________________________________________________________________

Support Agent 
Dish TV Technologies 

www.dishtv.co.nz 





1117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 70


  Reply # 564033 3-Jan-2012 15:36 Send private message

Actually it's $169 + $9.95 for an DVBS box with HDMI output




Asus Crosshair V Formula AMD FX8320, 8GB Corsair Vengence LP, 2X Sapphire Radeon HD7850 2GB 1000/1300, 1x WesternDigital WD2500AAJS 7200rpm 8MB cache SATAII , 1x Samsung spinpoin F1 HD502IJ 1x storage mode, 2x Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD502IJ RAID0 Boot, 1x Pioneer DVR212s 18x DVDRW, SilverStone ST75F-P (750W) Full Modular PSU, OS WIN7 x64 ultimate SP1 (7601), SilverStone RaVeN RV02B-W (with USB3.0 upgrade)

469 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

  Reply # 564043 3-Jan-2012 16:35 Send private message

You need DVB-S2 to get HD off a satellite unfortunately

6 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 564056 3-Jan-2012 17:21 Send private message

Its a pity Stratos didn't ask the public for donations like PBS in the US does. I think Aljazeera news is broadcast free to air and I don't think anyone else in NZ own the rights to it so I hope Freeview give me Aljazeera 24/7 and it would be the only 24 hour news channel on Freeview.

727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564058 3-Jan-2012 17:35 Send private message

Brunzy: You need DVB-S2 to get HD off a satellite unfortunately

This is not true.  SBS HD is 720p on DVB-S, not DVB-S2, for example.

201 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted
Dish TV

  Reply # 564090 3-Jan-2012 18:54 Send private message

Still People will need to spend more on top of the equipment they have, Freeview doesn't need HD broadcasts on Optus D1 Its not worth it. If people need HD content just get Freeview HD if you live in cities but in rural get SKY




______________________________________________________________________________________

Support Agent 
Dish TV Technologies 

www.dishtv.co.nz 





727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564097 3-Jan-2012 19:26 Send private message

joshhill96: Still People will need to spend more on top of the equipment they have,...

Not me, and not anyone with other than a real cheap STB.

Freeview doesn't need HD broadcasts on Optus D1 Its not worth it.

Content is controlled by the broadcaster, not 'Freeview'.  It is fundamentally unfair however that HD FTA content available to some via DVB-T is not available to all via DVB-S.

If people need HD content just get Freeview HD if you live in cities but in rural get SKY

I live in Auckland - I have no DVB-T coverage, nor will I pay for what others receive for free, nor will I pay Sky a bent cent while they carry advertising.  I'll subscribe to a per-channel service without advertising, if the rate is sensible, but that's it.  Meanwhile, Freeview should be pressuring Sky to broadcast their (FV's) content unencrypted, or be sending out free cards to unlock it.

201 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted
Dish TV

  Reply # 564188 4-Jan-2012 07:04 Send private message

Agree with you, Sky has many Free-to-air broadcasts which can be unencrypted for all to watch such as  Trackside, Calvary, Niu FM and The Edge FM already avaialable. France 24, RT, BBC World, etc... would be good. The Box was originally going to be unlocked for Freeview but they decided to get Prime on.




______________________________________________________________________________________

Support Agent 
Dish TV Technologies 

www.dishtv.co.nz 





279 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564321 4-Jan-2012 13:06 Send private message


It is fundamentally unfair however that HD FTA content available to some via DVB-T is not available to all via DVB-S.


I think that it's unfair that Telstra's highspeed internet service is available to some in Wellington, but not all, and also not available to the rest of NZ, but that's the limits of the network, same as the DVB-T.

DVB-S was only intended to be a backup where the DVB-T service did not get to.


Meanwhile, Freeview should be pressuring Sky to broadcast their (FV's) content unencrypted

With what leverage?
That would take a piece of legislaton I would think. (which could be done, but I don't know what incentive the government would have, seeing as they already put money into a dvb-t system for 87% of the country)

and then, you would still need a DVB-S2 receiver as Sky HD feeds are mpeg4.


727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564331 4-Jan-2012 13:23 Send private message

JonnyCam:

It is fundamentally unfair however that HD FTA content available to some via DVB-T is not available to all via DVB-S.


I think that it's unfair that Telstra's highspeed internet service is available to some in Wellington, but not all, and also not available to the rest of NZ, but that's the limits of the network, same as the DVB-T.

Telstra is a private concern and can make whatever arrangements they wish.  Freeview was touted as a FTA public service.  The cases are not equivalent.

DVB-S was only intended to be a backup where the DVB-T service did not get to.

That isn't a "back-up"; that would be for coverage when the DVB-T system fails.  What it is is an alternative where there is no cover.  As such, it should provide the same level of service.

Meanwhile, Freeview should be pressuring Sky to broadcast their (FV's) content unencrypted

With what leverage?

Well, we could start with denial of content for rebroadcast, then throw in the current cost of duplicating the transmission in SD which would become redundant.

That would take a piece of legislaton I would think.

Well, it could be done that way of course: Sky could be compulsorily nationalised, but negotiation could well be all that was required.

(which could be done, but I don't know what incentive the government would have, seeing as they already put money into a dvb-t system for 87% of the country)

The other 13%.


and then, you would still need a DVB-S2 receiver as Sky HD feeds are mpeg4.


True, and in my case, not an issue as I already have one, but it is a valid point.  It's another area where FV was misbegotten at its inception. There is no need for a DVB-T network at all - the whole kaboodle should have been DVB-S2 based.  Our "brave new TV" system is obsolete and moribund before it has even got itself fully off the ground.  Appropriate for a terrestrial system I guess.

279 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564434 4-Jan-2012 19:01 Send private message


Telstra is a private concern and can make whatever arrangements they wish. Freeview was touted as a FTA public service. The cases are not equivalent.


Fair enough, b ut Freeview via DVB-S is still providing a replacement FTA service, in a method which everyone in NZ can receive (I believe) where the same could not be said of the analog FTA system.
The quality / resoltion is a problem, but you get to the point of cost / benefit anaylysis, where it's not viable / desireable.

Maybe more transmitters will be added later on for the in-fill like yourselves.

The other 13% do no constitute an incentive, as the will still receive FTA TV, granted more people on Geekzone would be wanting HD, but the average person I don't think cares - or thinks that HD is something you get with Sky.


That isn't a "back-up"; that would be for coverage when the DVB-T system fails. What it is is an alternative where there is no cover. As such, it should provide the same level of service.

Ok, then take it as a complimentary delivery medium, whilst at a lower quality, is still receivable.

I don't mean to say that everyone in NZ should be able to receive HD TV FTA, but I don't think there is currently any money in the budget fot hat, and HD DVB-S (or forcing a private concern to unencrypt) is certainly not.


Our "brave new TV" system is obsolete and moribund before it has even got itself fully off the ground. Appropriate for a terrestrial system I guess.

Looks like DVB-T is the way many countires are going. I guess that is because they get to re-use all of that spectrum, and not have to continually pay for satellite bandwidth which (I guess) is quite expensive.








120 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 564435 4-Jan-2012 19:10

Or, in my case, just bypass the whole thing and go on-demand, bandwidth permitting. Bruce Simpson @Aardvark seems to have the same idea. Anything to immunise myself from Prolefeed.

727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 564440 4-Jan-2012 19:26 Send private message

Amen to that. Roll on fast, cheap fibre I say.

1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Moment of Truth?
Created by BarTender, last reply by gzt on 22-Sep-2014 15:42 (411 replies)
Pages... 26 27 28


Geekzone giveaway: ADATA SSD SP610 256GB and ADATA PV110 Power Bank
Created by freitasm, last reply by Elpie on 22-Sep-2014 23:15 (38 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Festival of Democracy
Created by gzt, last reply by sdav on 22-Sep-2014 23:31 (126 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


GCSB Surveillance Vans?
Created by snowball, last reply by ResponseMediaNZ on 23-Sep-2014 08:20 (43 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Predict E(l)ection 2014 & win
Created by nakedmolerat, last reply by Geektastic on 22-Sep-2014 23:10 (83 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Electrical cable recall
Created by freitasm, last reply by richms on 22-Sep-2014 19:08 (17 replies)
Pages... 2


TV for under $1000?
Created by TeaLeaf, last reply by richms on 22-Sep-2014 20:46 (16 replies)
Pages... 2


IOS8 - Network Load
Created by FireEngine, last reply by raytaylor on 20-Sep-2014 16:55 (45 replies)
Pages... 2 3



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.