Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
2564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 678160 28-Aug-2012 13:32 Send private message

ibuksh: Precisely

if apple can prove that their code and methods of implementation has been copied then yeah totally go for an arm and a leg from samsung coz they stole your hard work but they didnt... instead they liked something and found out another way of doing it and did it their own way (and since Apple is so sour now about that - they probably did it better than Apple)..

So either suck it up that someone created a better product than yours or make something even better and beat them at it..

Samsung Galaxy S2 had the voice talk and voice commands way before Siri was released.. but samsung didnt start jumping up and down saying their idea was stolen.. they just accepted that a better voice assistant was created and they made it better in the S3 and with jelly bean "Google Now" even does better..


Apple being sour? Don't think so, although there is a bit of sourness on here due to Apple beating Samsung in a court case. And its subjective if you feel Samsungs implemenation is better. Thats the issue with these threads at time, we all like our fave device, but often it gets one sided. I use Apple, but I'm trying to sit neutral and discuss the rights and wrongs of patents, not get into a discussion biased by your chosen device, or how you or I may feel on the case outcome. In fact a patent thread has nothing to do with Apple or Samsung, there are many cases over the years on the same issues.

520 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 34


  Reply # 678163 28-Aug-2012 13:37 Send private message

tdgeek:
nzgeek:
tdgeek: Nice detailed post.  Where do you see pinch to zoom?  It software, but more so it is an idea. Standard fare these days, but a great innovation.

I see pinch-to-zoom falling under the same category. It's an idea, but how it's handled can be done many ways. Nobody should be given full rights to all of those different ways.

It's also not an original idea. In the movie Minority Report (2004), there are scenes where Tom Cruise's character is manipulating data on a holographic screen. There's at least one place in one of these scenes where he zooms in on an image by 'grabbing' a point with each hand and stretching them apart. This is very much a pinch-to-zoom type of interface, being shown in a sci-fi movie that pre-dates the iPhone by more than 2 years.


I'd then assume that the movie did not patent that idea, although it isnt a product, its a movie.

The key thing here is 'prior art'. US patent law requires that all patented inventions are 'novel'. The existence of sufficiently similar prior art should cause the patent to fail this novelty test, and therefore not get granted.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, there are so many software patents that it's almost impossible to find all relevant prior art. Patent examiners certainly aren't given anywhere near the time needed to do a thorough search, let along an exhaustive search. As such, there are huge numbers of patents being granted for things that are already covered by other patents. There was a study done on this, but I can't find the link right now. I'll post it if I find it.

245 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 678164 28-Aug-2012 13:37 Send private message

nzgeek:
tdgeek: Nice detailed post.  Where do you see pinch to zoom?  It software, but more so it is an idea. Standard fare these days, but a great innovation.

I see pinch-to-zoom falling under the same category. It's an idea, but how it's handled can be done many ways. Nobody should be given full rights to all of those different ways.

It's also not an original idea. In the movie Minority Report (2004), there are scenes where Tom Cruise's character is manipulating data on a holographic screen. There's at least one place in one of these scenes where he zooms in on an image by 'grabbing' a point with each hand and stretching them apart. This is very much a pinch-to-zoom type of interface, being shown in a sci-fi movie that pre-dates the iPhone by more than 2 years.


I am sorry but the pinch-and-zoom idea in Minority Report has no commercial consequences, i.e. its not the reason why we pay to see the movie, nor did the movie producers invested $$ in researching that the pinch-and-zoom is good for that particular scene in the movie.  Not a good example i am afraid.

411 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 678165 28-Aug-2012 13:39 Send private message

tdgeek:
ibuksh: Precisely

if apple can prove that their code and methods of implementation has been copied then yeah totally go for an arm and a leg from samsung coz they stole your hard work but they didnt... instead they liked something and found out another way of doing it and did it their own way (and since Apple is so sour now about that - they probably did it better than Apple)..

So either suck it up that someone created a better product than yours or make something even better and beat them at it..

Samsung Galaxy S2 had the voice talk and voice commands way before Siri was released.. but samsung didnt start jumping up and down saying their idea was stolen.. they just accepted that a better voice assistant was created and they made it better in the S3 and with jelly bean "Google Now" even does better..


Apple being sour? Don't think so, although there is a bit of sourness on here due to Apple beating Samsung in a court case. And its subjective if you feel Samsungs implemenation is better. Thats the issue with these threads at time, we all like our fave device, but often it gets one sided. I use Apple, but I'm trying to sit neutral and discuss the rights and wrongs of patents, not get into a discussion biased by your chosen device, or how you or I may feel on the case outcome. In fact a patent thread has nothing to do with Apple or Samsung, there are many cases over the years on the same issues.


I dont feel one's implementation is better than the other, I just gave an example.. coz if you see someone tried to copy your idea and made an inferior product, you wouldnt be too fussed about it anyway..

I have used apple and I have used samsung galaxy devices and they both have their own pros and cons because they have both implemented the ideas in their own ways..

1904 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 77

Subscriber

  Reply # 678166 28-Aug-2012 13:39 Send private message

ibuksh:
tdgeek:
nzgeek:
tdgeek:?Nice detailed post.? Where do you see pinch to zoom?? It software, but more so it is an idea. Standard fare these days, but a great innovation.

I see pinch-to-zoom falling under the same category. It's an idea, but how it's handled can be done many ways. Nobody should be given full rights to all of those different ways.

It's also not an original idea. In the movie Minority Report (2004), there are scenes where Tom Cruise's character is manipulating data on a holographic screen. There's at least one place in one of these scenes where he zooms in on an image by 'grabbing' a point with each hand and stretching them apart. This is very much a pinch-to-zoom type of interface, being shown in a sci-fi movie that pre-dates the iPhone by more than 2 years.


I'd then assume that the movie did not patent that idea, although it isnt a product, its a movie.


Lets just say that they werent stupid enough to think that they should...


But falls into the category of 'prior art' maybe?




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

707 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 144

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 678174 28-Aug-2012 13:50 Send private message

nzgeek:
tdgeek: Nice detailed post.  Where do you see pinch to zoom?  It software, but more so it is an idea. Standard fare these days, but a great innovation.

I see pinch-to-zoom falling under the same category. It's an idea, but how it's handled can be done many ways. Nobody should be given full rights to all of those different ways.

It's also not an original idea. In the movie Minority Report (2004), there are scenes where Tom Cruise's character is manipulating data on a holographic screen. There's at least one place in one of these scenes where he zooms in on an image by 'grabbing' a point with each hand and stretching them apart. This is very much a pinch-to-zoom type of interface, being shown in a sci-fi movie that pre-dates the iPhone by more than 2 years.


I was thinking the Minority Report too when reading about pinch-to-zoom.  INAL but I thought that if the idea was already in the public domain then it could not be patented.  According to IMDB, this film was released in 2002 - the CGI was probably made in 2001 and probably thought of potentially years before that.

Didn't we have the same argument about the Galaxy Tab where someone was using a "tablet style" device in the film 2001: A Space Odyssey from 1968 - but still it took court cases to overturn the sales ban in Oz.

What we should all be doing is looking through sci-fi movies and patenting ideas so that when the eventually do come true we can be rich.  Oh hang on, Apple have already patented that idea :P

I admit, I'm not an Apple fan - that does not make me a phandroid (I've even bought an iPad and iPod shuffle for my wife).  I think Apple products are well presented but are overpriced (58%) and they are using market force and patents to bully/stifle competition - in the same way Microsoft were accused of doing.




Procrastination eventually pays off.

2564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 678175 28-Aug-2012 13:53 Send private message

ibuksh:I have used apple and I have used samsung galaxy devices and they both have their own pros and cons because they have both implemented the ideas in their own ways..


I gather that pinch to zoom is an idea, I'm not sure what tech to provide that function falls under the patent. I'd certainly call it novel and patentable for that very reason. I would not call curved edges patentable, the issue there is more a passing off. But at the end of the day, the value Apple placed on these numbers of infringements was just $24 per device. Should have bought licences or got a legal judgement early on. ironically, in Stuff today, Samsung engineers have been working on designs to avoid the patent issues for a year now . many of these companies pay each other for various things, iOS has Google based default apps, they paid Google a lot for Maps, Google pays Apple a lot for Apple to use Google search in iOS, its actually quite fascinating. But I digress!


384 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 4

Subscriber

  Reply # 678176 28-Aug-2012 13:54 Send private message

 
I am sorry but the pinch-and-zoom idea in Minority Report has no commercial consequences, i.e. its not the reason why we pay to see the movie, nor did the movie producers invested $$ in researching that the pinch-and-zoom is good for that particular scene in the movie.  Not a good example i am afraid.



If someone invents something and releases it, and they don't patent it, someone else can't later patent that same invention because there is prior art. The fact that the prior art was not patented is irrelevant. 

How about this ancient video that shows gestures, and more specifically shows pinch gestures to scale an object (see bout 4m 30secs in) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmmxVA5xhuo

Can someone tell me again what apple invented (other than their specific implementation of pinch and zoom on the iphone)?

707 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 144

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 678181 28-Aug-2012 14:02 Send private message

blair003:
 
I am sorry but the pinch-and-zoom idea in Minority Report has no commercial consequences, i.e. its not the reason why we pay to see the movie, nor did the movie producers invested $$ in researching that the pinch-and-zoom is good for that particular scene in the movie.  Not a good example i am afraid.



If someone invents something and releases it, and they don't patent it, someone else can't later patent that same invention because there is prior art. The fact that the prior art was not patented is irrelevant. 

How about this ancient video that shows gestures, and more specifically shows pinch gestures to scale an object (see bout 4m 30secs in) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmmxVA5xhuo

Can someone tell me again what apple invented (other than their specific implementation of pinch and zoom on the iphone)?


Wow that's pretty awesome for 1988 technology!




Procrastination eventually pays off.

411 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 678182 28-Aug-2012 14:02 Send private message

Well that all points back to something someone has already mentioned earlier in this thread and I would most happily reiterate.. the US Patent system is broken..

the patent officer sees its from Apple and says.."hey.. it must be their original idea, no one else could have thought of it before." and boom.. its patented to apple.

What would be more awesome is someone file a case against Apple for patenting ideas thats been around already for a long time and not their "original"

2564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 678184 28-Aug-2012 14:02 Send private message

StarBlazer:
nzgeek:
tdgeek: Nice detailed post.  Where do you see pinch to zoom?  It software, but more so it is an idea. Standard fare these days, but a great innovation.

I see pinch-to-zoom falling under the same category. It's an idea, but how it's handled can be done many ways. Nobody should be given full rights to all of those different ways.

It's also not an original idea. In the movie Minority Report (2004), there are scenes where Tom Cruise's character is manipulating data on a holographic screen. There's at least one place in one of these scenes where he zooms in on an image by 'grabbing' a point with each hand and stretching them apart. This is very much a pinch-to-zoom type of interface, being shown in a sci-fi movie that pre-dates the iPhone by more than 2 years.


I was thinking the Minority Report too when reading about pinch-to-zoom.  INAL but I thought that if the idea was already in the public domain then it could not be patented.  According to IMDB, this film was released in 2002 - the CGI was probably made in 2001 and probably thought of potentially years before that.

Didn't we have the same argument about the Galaxy Tab where someone was using a "tablet style" device in the film 2001: A Space Odyssey from 1968 - but still it took court cases to overturn the sales ban in Oz.

What we should all be doing is looking through sci-fi movies and patenting ideas so that when the eventually do come true we can be rich.  Oh hang on, Apple have already patented that idea :P

I admit, I'm not an Apple fan - that does not make me a phandroid (I've even bought an iPad and iPod shuffle for my wife).  I think Apple products are well presented but are overpriced (58%) and they are using market force and patents to bully/stifle competition - in the same way Microsoft were accused of doing.


At the end of the day, these behemoth companies are fighting hard. Apple, Google, Samsung. That's driving progress on devices, and irregardless of what we use or prefer, we all get the underlying benefit. Thats a good thing.

411 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 678185 28-Aug-2012 14:05 Send private message

tdgeek:
ibuksh:I have used apple and I have used samsung galaxy devices and they both have their own pros and cons because they have both implemented the ideas in their own ways..


I gather that pinch to zoom is an idea, I'm not sure what tech to provide that function falls under the patent. I'd certainly call it novel and patentable for that very reason. I would not call curved edges patentable, the issue there is more a passing off. But at the end of the day, the value Apple placed on these numbers of infringements was just $24 per device. Should have bought licences or got a legal judgement early on. ironically, in Stuff today, Samsung engineers have been working on designs to avoid the patent issues for a year now . many of these companies pay each other for various things, iOS has Google based default apps, they paid Google a lot for Maps, Google pays Apple a lot for Apple to use Google search in iOS, its actually quite fascinating. But I digress!



The technology that they use to implement that idea could be patented. But someone else can totally build up another way of implementing the same thing their own way..

Like it was said earlier in this thread, its not a simple decompile , recompile , repackage..

1793 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 212


  Reply # 678186 28-Aug-2012 14:10 Send private message

tdgeek:
At the end of the day, these behemoth companies are fighting hard. Apple, Google, Samsung. That's driving progress on devices, and irregardless of what we use or prefer, we all get the underlying benefit. Thats a good thing.


I don't see how patents and lawsuits are driving progress or benefiting consumers though... surely the competition in the marketplace is driving the progress and that's where the consumer sees the benefits.

411 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 678187 28-Aug-2012 14:13 Send private message

sidefx:
tdgeek:
At the end of the day, these behemoth companies are fighting hard. Apple, Google, Samsung. That's driving progress on devices, and irregardless of what we use or prefer, we all get the underlying benefit. Thats a good thing.


I don't see how patents and lawsuits are driving progress or benefiting consumers though... surely the competition in the marketplace is driving the progress and that's where the consumer sees the benefits.


I guess what he (probably) meant was people are coming up with better and better ideas and that how the customers are benefitting

2564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 678188 28-Aug-2012 14:13 Send private message

ibuksh: Well that all points back to something someone has already mentioned earlier in this thread and I would most happily reiterate.. the US Patent system is broken..

the patent officer sees its from Apple and says.."hey.. it must be their original idea, no one else could have thought of it before." and boom.. its patented to apple.

What would be more awesome is someone file a case against Apple for patenting ideas thats been around already for a long time and not their "original"


Patents laws right or wrong are not only/mainly used by Apple. All IT companies use them, heavily. Seems to me to be bias, correct me if I am wrong.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Moment of Truth?
Created by BarTender, last reply by gzt on 22-Sep-2014 15:42 (411 replies)
Pages... 26 27 28


Geekzone giveaway: ADATA SSD SP610 256GB and ADATA PV110 Power Bank
Created by freitasm, last reply by Athlonite on 22-Sep-2014 15:51 (31 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Festival of Democracy
Created by gzt, last reply by Jaxson on 22-Sep-2014 17:43 (122 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


GCSB Surveillance Vans?
Created by snowball, last reply by DarthKermit on 22-Sep-2014 17:27 (27 replies)
Pages... 2


Cheapest DSL with no contract in Auckland?
Created by TeaLeaf, last reply by TeaLeaf on 22-Sep-2014 17:52 (21 replies)
Pages... 2


Predict E(l)ection 2014 & win
Created by nakedmolerat, last reply by networkn on 22-Sep-2014 08:51 (80 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Capital gain tax on property vs other investments.
Created by rayonline, last reply by sir1963 on 22-Sep-2014 18:11 (35 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Electrical cable recall
Created by freitasm, last reply by gzt on 22-Sep-2014 17:35 (15 replies)


Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.