Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... | 21
218 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 677177 26-Aug-2012 17:11 Send private message

richms: Copying happens all the time with cars. To think that you shouldnt take inspiration from competing products is to just go totally against the design process.


Indeed.  And illustrates my point above. Copying is not necessarily bad and is how design improves.  The question is when do you cross the line into plagiarism/duplication or what constitutes something unique and patentable.


6203 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 216

Trusted

  Reply # 677182 26-Aug-2012 17:40 Send private message

spacedog:
richms: Copying happens all the time with cars. To think that you shouldnt take inspiration from competing products is to just go totally against the design process.


Indeed.  And illustrates my point above. Copying is not necessarily bad and is how design improves.  The question is when do you cross the line into plagiarism/duplication or what constitutes something unique and patentable.



absolutely ... imagine mr benz patenting cars have 4 wheels, or accelerator pedal on right, brake in middle, or disc brakes, or ...

in another vein, the verge vid on youtube - they use apple products ...




Apologies for poor typing standards when on Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE/iPad 2 Wifi

6099 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 386

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 677183 26-Aug-2012 17:40 Send private message

richms: Copying happens all the time with cars. To think that you shouldnt take inspiration from competing products is to just go totally against the design process.


I was just compiling this email in my head. Imagine if Ford had patented all the car shapes! We would have no innovation or progress and you would have only 1 car manufacturer in the world.

218 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 677186 26-Aug-2012 17:46 Send private message

networkn:
richms: Copying happens all the time with cars. To think that you shouldnt take inspiration from competing products is to just go totally against the design process.


I was just compiling this email in my head. Imagine if Ford had patented all the car shapes! We would have no innovation or progress and you would have only 1 car manufacturer in the world.


Yeah, I don't think the rectangle with rounded corners should have ever been granted a patent.

Also, think many people will learn from Samsung in this trial that if you are going to emulate a design that has a patent filed on it, don't be so damned obvious about it in your internal emails and documents.

;)


147 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 677311 26-Aug-2012 22:07 Send private message

The patent system is broken and has been for a long time. This case only reinforces that. This is only the start, there will appeals probably from both sides and they have lined up cases in 10 other countries so there is a long way to go.

These decisions will not affect NZ directly as we have a separate legal system and there is probably little point bringing a case here as our market is too small. However if for example Samsung is banned from selling certain products then they will hardly supply just us. It is not worth it.

7532 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 236

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 677355 27-Aug-2012 01:50 Send private message

Fortunately there are effectively no software patents in NZ, we are one of the few sane countries in the world in this regard.

147 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 677409 27-Aug-2012 09:03 Send private message

Ragnor: Fortunately there are effectively no software patents in NZ, we are one of the few sane countries in the world in this regard.


Actually you can at the moment but there is strict criteria around it. 

A new Patents bill currently before Parliament is seeking to exclude it though.  Here is a quote from the commentary to the bill:

"We recommend amending clause 15 to include computer programs among inventions that may not be patented. We received many submissions concerning the patentability of computer programs. Under the Patents Act 1953 computer programs can be patented in New Zealand provided they produce a commercially useful effect.3 Open source, or free, software has grown in popularity since the 1980s. Protecting software by patenting is inconsistent with the open source model, and its proponents oppose it. A number of submitters argued that there is no “inventive step” in software development, as “new” software invariably builds on existing software. They felt that computer software should be excluded from patent protection as software patents can stifle innovation and competition, and can be granted for trivial or existing techniques. In general we accept this position.

While the bill would provide adequate incentives for innovation, however, we are aware of New Zealand companies who have invested in a significant number of software-related inventions, involving embedded software.4 We sought advice on the approach taken in other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the United States, and whether legislation that would enable “embedded software” to be patentable might be practicable. After careful consideration we concluded that developing a clear and definitive distinction between embedded and other types of software is not a simple matter; and that, for the sake of clarity, a simple approach would be best. We received advice that our recommendation to include computer programs among the inventions that may not be patented would be unlikely to prevent the granting of patents for inventions involving embedded software.

We recommend that the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand develop guidelines for inventions containing embedded software."

245 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 677442 27-Aug-2012 10:01 Send private message

Giggs: The patent system is broken and has been for a long time. This case only reinforces that. This is only the start, there will appeals probably from both sides and they have lined up cases in 10 other countries so there is a long way to go.

These decisions will not affect NZ directly as we have a separate legal system and there is probably little point bringing a case here as our market is too small. However if for example Samsung is banned from selling certain products then they will hardly supply just us. It is not worth it.


It may be broken but it does serve its purpose in this case.  There are not many other Android phones, and there are are plenty of them, that blatantly designed to look and feel like the iPhone like the Galaxy S range.  Even the single home button, Android was never designed with a single home button interface.

367 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Subscriber

  Reply # 677456 27-Aug-2012 10:16 Send private message

If someone creates a product so similar to a competitors product that consumers are reasonably likely to mistake it for the competitors product, that is probably illegal (I think this falls under trade dress, not patents per se.. although I could be wrong, IP laws get a bit complex).

But that doesn't mean that because ferrari are known for having all their cars red that ford, nissan etc can't paint and sell red cars of their own.

3294 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 238

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 677461 27-Aug-2012 10:23 Send private message

I feel sorry for all those people who bought a Samsung device and still don't know its not an Apple.

409 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 677463 27-Aug-2012 10:25 Send private message

kiwitrc: I feel sorry for all those people who bought a Samsung device and still don't know its not an Apple.


I suppose if someone's bought a smartphone, they are smart enough to know what they have bought..

The interface, look and feel can be similar but there is no mistaking when the product brand spells out "SAMSUNG" insteap of Apple with their logo..

5906 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 77

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 677464 27-Aug-2012 10:26 Send private message

kiwitrc: I feel sorry for all those people who bought a Samsung device and still don't know its not an Apple.


Sounds like such a person could have been on the jury :)

Cyril

IT Professional
1305 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 33

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 677466 27-Aug-2012 10:37 Send private message

ibuksh:
kiwitrc: I feel sorry for all those people who bought a Samsung device and still don't know its not an Apple.


I suppose if someone's bought a smartphone, they are smart enough to know what they have bought..

The interface, look and feel can be similar but there is no mistaking when the product brand spells out "SAMSUNG" insteap of Apple with their logo..


I think it was obvious that kiwitrc was being facetious or sarcastic Laughing

409 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 677468 27-Aug-2012 10:38 Send private message

keewee01:
ibuksh:
kiwitrc: I feel sorry for all those people who bought a Samsung device and still don't know its not an Apple.


I suppose if someone's bought a smartphone, they are smart enough to know what they have bought..

The interface, look and feel can be similar but there is no mistaking when the product brand spells out "SAMSUNG" insteap of Apple with their logo..


I think it was obvious that kiwitrc was being facetious or sarcastic Laughing


Yeah I got that.. thats why I tried my best to make a plain statement..

409 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 677471 27-Aug-2012 10:40 Send private message

its just wierd how samsung had similar looking phones in design way before the 1st iphone and still gets slapped with a fine/ban

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... | 21
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new jobs are posted to our jobs board:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Telecom introduces unlimited broadband data plan
Created by freitasm, last reply by NonprayingMantis on 25-Apr-2014 12:17 (111 replies)
Pages... 6 7 8


Stonedine
Created by Lizard1977, last reply by mattwnz on 24-Apr-2014 15:45 (67 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Windows 8 System Mechanics
Created by eme, last reply by eme on 24-Apr-2014 21:10 (20 replies)
Pages... 2


Using my Mac to ring family in the UK
Created by Geektastic, last reply by nakedmolerat on 24-Apr-2014 11:28 (19 replies)
Pages... 2


Telecom has started metering their TiVo customers' broadband usage (WITHOUT PRENOTIFICATION)
Created by Peteriv, last reply by mattwnz on 24-Apr-2014 15:11 (74 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Parallel imported product
Created by Wills1, last reply by joker97 on 23-Apr-2014 21:01 (53 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Forms of government for New Zealand
Created by charsleysa, last reply by gzt on 25-Apr-2014 14:22 (181 replies)
Pages... 11 12 13


MH370 - Call for Search & Rescue Help
Created by DS248, last reply by Technofreak on 25-Apr-2014 12:43 (751 replies)
Pages... 49 50 51



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.