P1n3apqlExpr3ss: So lets analyze the rumours... from this source: http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/27/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-full-specs-1-5ghz-quad-core-1080p-display-ceramic-case/
1.5GHz quad-core Samsung Exynos processor
4.8-inch ?full HD? 1080p resolution with 16:9 aspect ratio display
Screen size is likely to be similar but 1080p? Heck no
A 2-megapixel front-facing camera and an 8-megapixel rear camera
Would have expected a higher megapixel sensor here
Anything is possible
American markets, plus LTE growth in Europe, obvious enough
Well duh, if it was Gingerbread it would be DOA
8 Megapixel is more than enough to produce images for poster-size production. They need to stop increasing the megapixels and improve the quality. They've been "stuck" at around the 8mp mark for a couple of years now and the quality is slowly improving to the stage that they're giving a lot of P+S camera's a run for their money. How often do you use photos you take on a phone for anything other than wallpaper backgrounds? 5mp is enough for most people, they just need to improve the processing that usually results in blacks having purplish tints to them and static colours having a bit of a wavy look to them. Squeezing >8mp out of the tiny sensors in phones is asking a bit much. I'd rather they improve high-ISO sensitivity etc.
4.8" display would be fairly unlikely for a flagship phone. 16:9 aspect ratio is a possibility, a 1920x1080 resolution on a 4.8" display? I wouldn't hold my breath. If it actually _does_ end up having these specs, then it'll be pretty stunning. Super AMOLED HD+ or something?
Ceramic case? That would make it a premium product and make it a lot more expensive. I would've thought they'd be better off with some sort of magnesium alloy or carbon fibre if they were going the exotic-materials route.