What I shot today

Check our new Geekzone Price Comparison web site for electronics prices in New Zealand.

Forums › Digital Imaging › What I shot today

1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17

1279 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 758694 9-Feb-2013 14:39
joker97: was wondering - are we allowed to critique shots? if so we would only get better, but it needs to be written on the first post, some rules etc but if we want this thread to show pretty pics only and no wordy posts/debates that's fine too That's how it's done over on another forum (GP cough) and it used to work well when a lot of people were posting. Helped me out when I first got my camera.

RileyB

43 posts

Geek

Reply # 758701 9-Feb-2013 15:01
Hi guys, first post, myaswell be some photos. Not quite from today but close enough (click on any photo for a larger version):

Raikyn

85 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 758784 9-Feb-2013 21:05
insane: joker97: was wondering - are we allowed to critique shots? if so we would only get better, but it needs to be written on the first post, some rules etc but if we want this thread to show pretty pics only and no wordy posts/debates that's fine too That's how it's done over on another forum (GP cough) and it used to work well when a lot of people were posting. Helped me out when I first got my camera. My take on it is critique if you want, if you want critique on your shots then ask. You could make a specific thread for it, but I don't know if there is the volume here for it to work. Give it a go though, nothing to lose.

macuser

644 posts

Ultimate Geek

Reply # 758785 9-Feb-2013 21:09
Didn't take any shots today, but sure did redesign my photography website using square space, check it out. I'm a fashion/beauty/portrait kind of guy... http://jamesstringer.co.nz Boom new website - http://jamesstringer.co.nz

Raikyn

85 posts

Master Geek

Reply # 759217 10-Feb-2013 21:47
Spider

Zippity

326 posts

Ultimate Geek

Reply # 759244 10-Feb-2013 23:37
Dinner 1/500 - f5.6 - ISO 100 - EF 100mm Macro

peejayw

743 posts

Ultimate Geek

Reply # 761780 13-Feb-2013 15:11
Experimenting with focus stacking. 5 exposures varying ss f3.5 100mm macro Not quite right yet but interesting way to improve DOF

wazza15

38 posts

Geek

Reply # 763763 17-Feb-2013 13:56	One person supports this post
Photos I took recently on a Sydney

insane

1279 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 763765 17-Feb-2013 13:58
Went over that cable stay bridge the last time I was there, and it's really good looking as far as bridges go!

joker97

3941 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 763780 17-Feb-2013 14:45
What is the technique for the bus tram shot if I may ask ? Slow shutter and pull back on the zoom lens? Apologies for poor typing standards when on Samsung Galaxy S4

RileyB

43 posts

Geek

Reply # 763785 17-Feb-2013 15:15
joker97: What is the technique for the bus tram shot if I may ask ? Slow shutter and pull back on the zoom lens? That would be the one, shot at f20 to get 1/8 of a sec, that technique tends to work better with wider "standard zoom" lenses.

joker97

3941 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 764206 18-Feb-2013 15:05
Have a Question re sharpness of pix - NOT DUE TO lens/body/movement So let's assume there is no way you can change your lens/body and you use a tripod and your subject is not moving, you are using the lowest ISO possible, you are shooting at the sharpest aperture for your lens, assume you do not use RAW - how do you take the sharpest picture: 1) if shooting jpeg: do you set the sharpness on body softest or sharpest or in the middle? 2) what do you do post processing (i use adobe camera raw) - please let me know what you do in your software even if it's not ACR 3) others? thanks Apologies for poor typing standards when on Samsung Galaxy S4

Jaxson

4196 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 764210 18-Feb-2013 15:13
Hi, Also you could add 'use the mirror lockup' function on your camera if you want to get really pedantic about not introducing camera shake. On mine you set the 2 second delay and it raises the mirror, waits 2 seconds and then takes the shot. Or use extra weight to hold your tripod steady etc. I also think there is debate around when to use image stabilisation for the sharpest picture/video etc. joker97: i use adobe camera raw If you haven't tried it, I'd seriously recommend taking a look at Adobe Lightroom. there are some pretty massive real time corrections in there for the likes of adding controlled sharpness/chromatic aberration (purple fringing etc) correction. It's really been an eye opener for me that product.

RileyB

43 posts

Geek

Reply # 765228 18-Feb-2013 16:04
joker97: Have a Question re sharpness of pix - NOT DUE TO lens/body/movement So let's assume there is no way you can change your lens/body and you use a tripod and your subject is not moving, you are using the lowest ISO possible, you are shooting at the sharpest aperture for your lens, assume you do not use RAW - how do you take the sharpest picture: 1) if shooting jpeg: do you set the sharpness on body softest or sharpest or in the middle? 2) what do you do post processing (i use adobe camera raw) - please let me know what you do in your software even if it's not ACR 3) others? thanks Well first you would shoot in RAW. :P Personally I use Lightroom 4, but adobe Camera RAW might have similar functions. First apply lens profile. Second, move "Sharpening" slider up untill it looks good. Resizing the image can reduce effective sharpness, make sure yo sharpem the image at the size it's going to be view at. When using lightroom you can let it auto sharpen the image for the correct size when you export it. Did I mention shoot in RAW? If you want the SHARPEST images you can possibly get, you would shoot in RAW (seems to be a theme here) and use Canon Digital Photo Professional with the digital lens optimizer function. This would require you to use one of the slowly growing list of profiled lenses though. Edit: Should also mention the output medium also changes how much you need to sharpen an image.

Jaxson

4196 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Reply # 765247 18-Feb-2013 16:18
RileyB: Did I mention shoot in RAW? You should also mention that a RAW image may not initially seem as sharp as JPEG as no internal sharpening has been applied.

1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17