Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
2240 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 352

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717223 14-Nov-2012 16:55 Send private message

I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'

13479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3131

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717231 14-Nov-2012 17:00 Send private message

insane: I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'


I like this better, however I can see it just becoming very contentious. It's going to become very cliquey here.

2911 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 413

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717270 14-Nov-2012 17:50 Send private message

Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

13479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3131

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717272 14-Nov-2012 17:52 Send private message

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))


Much better!

2908 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 736


  Reply # 717277 14-Nov-2012 17:57 Send private message

insane: I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'


Yeah, ban those with minority views. 

I like it. 



BDFL - Memuneh
57623 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9257

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 717288 14-Nov-2012 18:29 Send private message

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))


Yes, that's more like what I was thinking. This is pretty much plonking anyway.





1863 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 192

Trusted

  Reply # 717289 14-Nov-2012 18:33 Send private message

I wouldn't agree with Plonking, as someone said before, it causes tension and is sometimes confusing to read. Then people won't want to come back to GZ..:(




Matthew

 

--

 

NZ TechBlog - "With News, Reviews, Videos and Chat it is the all time tech-lover wonderland!" | A bit about me | Follow me on Twitter | My Geekzone blog

 

Hungry? Get $10 off your first order on UberEATS with my code: eats-17atx.


2706 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 699

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717291 14-Nov-2012 18:36 Send private message

networkn:
Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))


Much better!

Big +1 for this!

956 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 347
Inactive user


  Reply # 717292 14-Nov-2012 18:38 Send private message

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))


+1

I was actually going to request this the other day but thought there wouldn't be much in favour





BDFL - Memuneh
57623 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9257

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 717294 14-Nov-2012 18:46 Send private message

Hmmm. So what's the problem here then? "Plonk" in my view (and by definition) is when YOU put someone into an ignore list that is for YOUR use only, not affecting anyone else. That's what I was thinking, and that's what Kyanar suggested.

How can filtering your personal view can "create[s] tension on the forums"?






4157 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 640

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 717295 14-Nov-2012 18:46 Send private message

freitasm: Would you folks have use for a "PLONK" button here on Geekzone?


Only if we also get an "I told you so, but you wouldn't listen." button. 




____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


956 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 347
Inactive user


  Reply # 717298 14-Nov-2012 18:48 Send private message

freitasm: Hmmm. So what's the problem here then? "Plonk" in my view (and by definition) is when YOU put someone into an ignore list that is for YOUR use only, not affecting anyone else. That's what I was thinking, and that's what Kyanar suggested.

How can filtering your personal view can "create[s] tension on the forums"?




Maybe people think its visible to others, whereas it's only filtering what you see not others



BDFL - Memuneh
57623 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9257

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 717299 14-Nov-2012 18:48 Send private message

As I said, I think people here are under the impressions that "plonk" applies to everyone's view, when in fact it's a user preference - a filtered view.





956 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 347
Inactive user


  Reply # 717303 14-Nov-2012 18:50 Send private message

Either way I'm for it _b



BDFL - Memuneh
57623 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9257

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 717304 14-Nov-2012 18:51 Send private message

Quoting from Wikipedia:


Plonk is a Usenet jargon term for adding a particular poster to one's kill file such that the poster's future postings are completely ignored.


I think some people either

a) didn't participate in Usenet much
b) didn't read the link in my OP.





1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:






Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.