Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
1885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 281

Subscriber

  Reply # 970013 20-Jan-2014 14:22 Send private message

I have just revived an old HP laptop that had Vista on it with Windows 8. It used to take about 3 years to start up, ran like a dog and was just generally rubbish.
Win8 has transformed it. Start up is quick. Apps load instantly. And it's all running on old hardware with 4GB of RAM.

Metro is excellent. Simple swipe from the right hit Start and there are all my apps how I want them. Not how the Start menu says I should have them.
Then when the desktop is required Classic Shell removes any need to complain about the lack of one button. If anything Win 8 makes you more productive because it is some times quicker to use the keyboard shortcuts that have been in Windows for years.

Win 8 was a big win IMO.

Seems people just get sh1tty because a single button on the taskbar was gone. Oh the horror!!

157 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 970023 20-Jan-2014 14:42 Send private message

MaxLV:

Nothing ill conceived about Metro at all IMHO. It's just another way to access programmes, and it's a lot easier to use than the old start button where your had to remember which folder programmes were in, and often navigate through multiple levels of folders just to find what you're looking for. Either that or everything has been dumped in one folder and you have to spend minute scrolling up and down trying to what you're looking for.
  


As a touch-screen interface it is "Ok"...still not as good or intuitive overall as IOS or Android IMHO, but I am sure it will catch-up.

Where it fell down horribly for me on a normal desktop/laptop with a decent amount of screen real estate is that by default, it forces you into using these full-screen apps (with limited functionality and interface options) which is anathema to productivity when compared to using  multiple, user-scalable/tile-able windows with full drop-down menus and functions. The default apps for imaging, videos, audio, PDFs etc etc all do this.

Yes I know it is easily changeable for those that know how, but A) not everyone does know how and B) why would it force a worse user experience on you rather than given you a simple option to chose what kind of device you are working on?

From a purely aesthetic point of view, I also found it very jarring transitioning repeatedly from full screen "Metro Start" back to a "real desktop" application when searching/launching as well.

I certainly don't bemoan the lack of the old school Start button per se, but the replacement wasn't a viable alternative for me and many others.

2893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 879


  Reply # 970044 20-Jan-2014 15:25 Send private message

It must be true, it's in a Blog.




Mike

 Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic.

471 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 25

Trusted

  Reply # 970154 20-Jan-2014 17:19 Send private message

Honestly didn't have much issue with Vista and still run it on two PC's here without issue, I run Windows 7 Pro on my main PC.

Drop the price further to within the range of Mac OS and I might consider going to Win 8, otherwise I will stick with Win7 until I forced to upgrade, due to hardware or other issues.




CraZeD,
Your friendly Southern Geeky Fellow :P
Want a free 21 day trial of Eve online? Click here

1273 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 219


  Reply # 970157 20-Jan-2014 17:23 One person supports this post Send private message

I feel Windows 8 is almost the exact opposite of Vista.

Vista was well designed, had an interface that worked, was designed for the way the majority of users used it (keyboard+mouse, no touch screen), and was intuitive and familiar with older versions of Windows. The issue with Vista was performance. I never had much of an issue with this because I had relatively high end hardware. In fact, my 2007 Vista box is still functional, used frequently for many tasks, and still works fine. But pre-SP1, particularly if you had been suckered by Microsoft's information on the minimum hardware specs needed to run it acceptably, it ran like an absolute dog. Vista's big problem was bugs and performance.

In total contrast, Windows 8 seems to perform well and flys even on lower-end machines. However, it suffers from an totally, utterly execrable user interface. Designed around a tablet paradigm and for hardware that most laptop/desktop users don't have (touchscreen etc), and are unlikely to have for some time.

Performance and feature wise I would have it in a heartbeat. If only it wasn't for the abominable UI. Give me an option that properly restores the start button/menus and never, ever, ever, exposes me to something that looks like Metro and I will quickly upgrade.

My next machine will likely be Win7. I have already priced the build I want from an OEM. I don't want the god-awful UI. Also, given that it will be on a KVM with a Vista box and a Win7 box, I don't want the UI paradigm changing totally every time I press a button.

28 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 970199 20-Jan-2014 18:26 Send private message

I'm using Windows 8.1 with Office 2013 on a HDD desktop and non-touchscreen SSD laptop, having switched from XP/Office 2003 laptop/desktop systems - mainly because the imminent lack of support for XP. I've used windows 8/8.1 for almost 12 months, and find the interface, reliability, and performance work extremely well.

Windows 8 family works well for me. My major gripe would be that many of the default "features/apps" irrelevant to me are time-consuming to annihilate, and that Office 2013 has way too many choices for my use. They should allow simpler initial configurations.

I also use daily two systems using NT 4.0, two with XP sp3, and will keep those running - but isolated from the Internet. The few times I have to reboot NT4 ( start of each year after holiday shutdown ), I'm always surprised how quickly it starts compared to all later versions of Windows, except 8/8.1 on SSD.

My iPad, with about 20% of the utilisation of the laptop, needs to be rebooted more often. One happy Windows 8.1 camper....

332 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 61
Inactive user


  Reply # 970216 20-Jan-2014 18:56 Send private message

MaxLV:
An opinion piece isn't 'news'. It's from someone who used to be Microsoft's most famous number one Fan boy. I really have to wonder why he decided it was a good 'story' to publish.


Here's a few more "opinion pireces" for you:

What Windows 9 Must Do To Avoid Flopping Like Windows 8[

Windows 9 release date, news: Microsoft plans 2015 release and move away from Windows 8

Windows 9 slated for 2015 - The next version of Windows is slated to arrive by April 2015 as the current version, Windows 8, is "tanking".


1838 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 164

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 970293 20-Jan-2014 21:00 One person supports this post Send private message

MaxLV: With Metro you can set up all your apps, desktop, Windows Programmes, data locations, etc in their own named group and simply scroll left or right to find what you're looking for and click once. That beats a multilevel start button menu system hands down, and it works just as well with a mouse and keyboard as it does with a touch screen. 

Although you could do this on the desktop also - replace the 'group' with 'folder'. The only real difference is a tile is customisable.

MaxLV: The criticism of Windows 8/8.1 is ALL about the Metro Interface, and how people 'dont like it' because it's different to the Start button. Not that it doesn't work, or that Windows 8/8.1 is buggy, slow, like Vista... 

Fixed.

Bang on here - a large majority of people simply hate the interface. It's too different and requires a learning curve people hate having forced on them. Resistance to change is a very basic human trait and one you'd think the UI developers should've had a good handle on. They didn't and the real sales of Win8/8.1 (as opposed to the forced OEM sales) are why the headline has been bandied about.

Off topic but related to my previous comment: I used a beta preview of Win8 and hated the interface from both an intuitive usability and aesthetic* pov, especially the single-tasking apps which took up the entire screen. I was also unimpressed with the removal of WMC as using this (and having it act as a server) is one of the primary functions of my main computer. This second point was the deal-breaker for me as there's no way I'm going to pay for a feature reduced version of something I already have and which works perfectly well. On the flip side, I was very impressed with the noticeable speed improvements (especially boot) and overall slickness of the product.

I was happy to pay to upgrade from Vista to Win7 - there's absolutely nothing compelling about Win8/8.1 that would ever cause me to part with my hard earned dollars for it.


* a 25" screen running 1920 x 1200 = a small amount of clustered tiles and a vast expanse of ugly nothing.




Vodafone VDSL:

259 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 970352 20-Jan-2014 22:58 Send private message

Buzz Bumble:
MaxLV:
An opinion piece isn't 'news'. It's from someone who used to be Microsoft's most famous number one Fan boy. I really have to wonder why he decided it was a good 'story' to publish.


Here's a few more "opinion pireces" for you:

What Windows 9 Must Do To Avoid Flopping Like Windows 8[

Windows 9 release date, news: Microsoft plans 2015 release and move away from Windows 8

Windows 9 slated for 2015 - The next version of Windows is slated to arrive by April 2015 as the current version, Windows 8, is "tanking".



Yeah, you're right, they're opinion pieces, all about the author's opinions from the first opinion piece.

Nothing to see here folks, move along. 

6840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 315


  Reply # 970360 20-Jan-2014 23:19 2 people support this post Send private message

JimmyH: I feel Windows 8 is almost the exact opposite of Vista.

Vista was well designed, had an interface that worked, was designed for the way the majority of users used it (keyboard+mouse, no touch screen), and was intuitive and familiar with older versions of Windows. The issue with Vista was performance. I never had much of an issue with this because I had relatively high end hardware. In fact, my 2007 Vista box is still functional, used frequently for many tasks, and still works fine. But pre-SP1, particularly if you had been suckered by Microsoft's information on the minimum hardware specs needed to run it acceptably, it ran like an absolute dog. Vista's big problem was bugs and performance.

In total contrast, Windows 8 seems to perform well and flys even on lower-end machines. However, it suffers from an totally, utterly execrable user interface. Designed around a tablet paradigm and for hardware that most laptop/desktop users don't have (touchscreen etc), and are unlikely to have for some time.

Performance and feature wise I would have it in a heartbeat. If only it wasn't for the abominable UI. Give me an option that properly restores the start button/menus and never, ever, ever, exposes me to something that looks like Metro and I will quickly upgrade.

My next machine will likely be Win7. I have already priced the build I want from an OEM. I don't want the god-awful UI. Also, given that it will be on a KVM with a Vista box and a Win7 box, I don't want the UI paradigm changing totally every time I press a button.



Yes, the problem with windows 8.1 is not the actual perforamcne of the OS, which performs better than previous versions. It even performs better than XP on my machine. The probelm is the interface, with the desktop part of it, and how it works with the metro touch screen part. But then again, you are trying try to merge a 30 +year old OS interface, with an new style touch screen interface with tiles, that is less than 5 years old. It is that jarring gap when you switch between the two, and how some things are metro, while other things are desktop, which is the problem. Metro is not a bad touch screen interface, and in some places it is better than IOS, but in other parts worse, but it is reaolly only any good on touch screen devices. It is painful to use with a mouse on dual screen. Really they should never have recmoeved the start menu, and given that as an option for desktop users.. People don't want to go to a full screen touch screen interface to access their desktop programs, that was just madness. I can certianly think of ways they could have done it better as  I am a designer, but I am not paid the millions to do that. I am glad though that the next version of windows will very likely fix the problems.

The other thing is that the removal of things like tranparent windows, flip 3d and widgets, it does dumb down the desktop interface back to windows 95. I think windows 7 / Vista is a far more beautiful interface, and IOS 7 has 'borrowed' some of those advancements with it's overlays. The removal though probably helps with improving it's performance on tablet devices, but I doubt by a huge amount, esp as they will only get more powerful

389 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 59

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 971688 21-Jan-2014 14:45 Send private message

KiwiNZ: It must be true, it's in a Blog.


It's an opinion until you add a stock photo.

1273 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 219


  Reply # 972474 22-Jan-2014 20:24 Send private message

According to Computerworld  and The Enquirer it seems HP has recognised that a lot of people don't want Windows 8, and it's holding back PC sales. Responding to the perception of Windows 8, they are bringing back and overtly marketing Windows 7 as an option on their consumer machines.

"HP is now preloading most of its PCs with Windows 7 as standard, with Windows 8 having been relegated to an optional customisation."

They even appear to be offering a discount as an incentive to take the Win7 option.

Given that HP is (I think) the second biggest OEM on the planet, this vote of no confidence in Win8 seems pretty significant?

259 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 972518 22-Jan-2014 23:45 Send private message

JimmyH: According to Computerworld  and The Enquirer it seems HP has recognised that a lot of people don't want Windows 8, and it's holding back PC sales. Responding to the perception of Windows 8, they are bringing back and overtly marketing Windows 7 as an option on their consumer machines.

"HP is now preloading most of its PCs with Windows 7 as standard, with Windows 8 having been relegated to an optional customisation."

They even appear to be offering a discount as an incentive to take the Win7 option.

Given that HP is (I think) the second biggest OEM on the planet, this vote of no confidence in Win8 seems pretty significant?



Also from the Computer World 'article'.

HP's selection of Windows 7 consumer-grade machines is small, just five models: Two notebooks and three desktops, with discounted prices starting at $480 and topping out at $1,000. By comparison, HP listed 68 different Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 laptop, desktop and hybrid models on its for-consumer website Monday.

So, again it's an opinion piece, not letting the facts get in the way of a sensationalist headline. (seen it all before with every new version of Windows...)



BDFL
49144 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4153

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 972526 22-Jan-2014 23:59 Send private message

And once it got into the blogging echo chamber it got a gigantic dimension and life of its own...







117 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 973152 23-Jan-2014 20:25

From past experience, Vista, for all its issues, didn't seem to cause the kind of desktop/laptop slump that's been associated with Windows 8.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Hierarchy of a mistake: Gerry Brownlee
Created by joker97, last reply by JWR on 25-Jul-2014 22:39 (67 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Geekzone giveaway: Thecus N2310 NAS
Created by freitasm, last reply by ottenpat on 25-Jul-2014 21:15 (89 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


MH 17 "shot down" all dead
Created by joker97, last reply by ScuL on 24-Jul-2014 21:40 (203 replies)
Pages... 12 13 14


Is chorus going to deliberately slow adsl internet down
Created by rugrat, last reply by richms on 25-Jul-2014 20:35 (51 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Huge Fuss, didn't even make it a year.
Created by networkn, last reply by Glassboy on 22-Jul-2014 19:50 (121 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


Skinny's new aggressive ad campaign
Created by Yabanize, last reply by Yabanize on 22-Jul-2014 23:35 (52 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Giving notice
Created by IlDuce, last reply by kharris on 24-Jul-2014 17:36 (15 replies)

Sickening floral smell in car, What next?
Created by TimA, last reply by Hammerer on 26-Jul-2014 00:01 (43 replies)
Pages... 2 3



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.