Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Buying anything on Amazon? Please use the Geekzone Amazon aff link.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
1994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 245

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090860 17-Jul-2014 16:01 4 people support this post Send private message

networkn: I guess we can be grateful no kids are involved.


Who's 'we'? What actual business of yours is it?

404 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1090864 17-Jul-2014 16:04 One person supports this post Send private message

Dratsab:
networkn: I guess we can be grateful no kids are involved.


Who's 'we'? What actual business of yours is it?


no one has to have any business with anyone as such, but when such high profile weddings are in limelight, its out there for people to watch and follow and hence people can take it (marriage)  for granted.

children are worst affected, so its good in a way that there was no such case.

1994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 245

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090870 17-Jul-2014 16:15 3 people support this post Send private message

I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming from dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.



7562 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 998

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090871 17-Jul-2014 16:16 One person supports this post Send private message

Dratsab: I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.


Say what now?


Awesome
4075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 643

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090913 17-Jul-2014 17:40 2 people support this post Send private message

trig42: I saw someone say in the 'debate' leading up to the decision to change the law that Gay Marriages would increase the divorce rate. True that.


True what? One example of a separation (based on conjecture no less) means the divorce rate has increased? and it's because of gay marriage? What data do you have to back up your fauxpinion?




Twitter: ajobbins

BDFL
50450 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4855

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090914 17-Jul-2014 17:43 3 people support this post Send private message

I got divorced in 1999. I helped increase the divorce rate for hetero couples.




1493 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 377

Subscriber

  Reply # 1090917 17-Jul-2014 17:45 4 people support this post Send private message

One hundred percent of divorces are caused by marriage.

4352 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 357

Trusted

  Reply # 1090920 17-Jul-2014 17:54 One person supports this post Send private message

networkn:
First same sex marriage in NZ didn't last a year!.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11294678

I know not every couple will be like this, but hard to not think it wasn't just done for the free stuff they got.  


Pretty cynical view!

If they've separated (it wasn't confirmed on the piece I saw), then I would imagine it is for similar reasons to those that cause half of heterosexual marriages to fail.

No reason us straight folk should be the only ones to enjoy all the misery of marital separations.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: AndroidNZ.net


447 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105

Subscriber

  Reply # 1090946 17-Jul-2014 18:38 Send private message

So apparently are not allowed to make comments about ethics of buying car radar detectors, (thread locked and posts deleted)

But it seems to be ok to revel in someone's marriage breaking up with undertones of homophobia.

Sad.

A.


BDFL
50450 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4855

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090950 17-Jul-2014 18:45 Send private message

The radar discussion is not locked. The replies that were off topic were removed there because they were off topic.




43 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1090962 17-Jul-2014 18:52

Pointless discussion - marriage is legal construct, if there is any meaning beyond that it is purely up to the individuals.

Who cares if shiny things made the couple overzealous - people have been marrying for stuff (visas, politics, dowries, etc.) for thousands of years. 

Opinions about the 'sanctity' or 'commitment' of marriage are just that - opinions. 



593 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  Reply # 1090963 17-Jul-2014 18:53 Send private message

Dratsab: I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming from dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.



I think the point being made, which you may have misinterpreted, was that any possible emotional harm from this possible divorce is limited to the married couple.

2833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091102 17-Jul-2014 23:00 Send private message

andrewNZ: I don't know (or care about) specifics, but they married as soon as they were ALLOWED to. They may have been together and wanting to marry for a long time prior.


Same sex marriage was not illegal under the status quo. The law change merely overturned a legal precedent whereby DIA refused to issue a marriage 'license' to same sex couples. A license which, incidentally, can be substituted for other legal instruments.



7562 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 998

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091112 17-Jul-2014 23:20 Send private message

MrMistofeles: Pointless discussion - marriage is legal construct, if there is any meaning beyond that it is purely up to the individuals.

Who cares if shiny things made the couple overzealous - people have been marrying for stuff (visas, politics, dowries, etc.) for thousands of years. 

Opinions about the 'sanctity' or 'commitment' of marriage are just that - opinions. 




Did I give any indications that my comments were anything other than my opinion? 90% of what you would find on any forum, geekzone being no exception, are opinions.



7562 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 998

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091115 17-Jul-2014 23:23 One person supports this post Send private message

NZtechfreak:
networkn:
First same sex marriage in NZ didn't last a year!.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11294678

I know not every couple will be like this, but hard to not think it wasn't just done for the free stuff they got.  


Pretty cynical view!

If they've separated (it wasn't confirmed on the piece I saw), then I would imagine it is for similar reasons to those that cause half of heterosexual marriages to fail.

No reason us straight folk should be the only ones to enjoy all the misery of marital separations.


My opinion is that they got married "because they could" (A very very poor reason). They got a bunch of stuff for being "first". Clearly the commitment wasn't really present to undertake something that deserved better.

Most marriages last better than a year, most people would try and save a marriage for longer than that.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

forgot how to unlock a car door
Created by joker97, last reply by benokobi on 18-Dec-2014 22:08 (38 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Spray Foam Insulation
Created by AACTech, last reply by timmmay on 18-Dec-2014 16:19 (28 replies)
Pages... 2


Has Spark (Telecom) locked their iphone 6 ?
Created by anewguy2014, last reply by michaelmurfy on 17-Dec-2014 14:32 (25 replies)
Pages... 2


Lightbox launches on PlayStation 4
Created by freitasm, last reply by networkn on 18-Dec-2014 22:18 (22 replies)
Pages... 2


In defence of cats
Created by Rikkitic, last reply by DarthKermit on 17-Dec-2014 15:40 (68 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


How to cool a room
Created by E3xtc, last reply by joker97 on 18-Dec-2014 22:34 (21 replies)
Pages... 2


Slaughter of Innocents
Created by networkn, last reply by networkn on 18-Dec-2014 20:08 (43 replies)
Pages... 2 3


How is iParcel these days?
Created by peejayw, last reply by surfisup1000 on 18-Dec-2014 21:45 (19 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.