Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Watch this topic Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
1844 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 165

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090860 17-Jul-2014 16:01 4 people support this post Send private message quote this post

networkn: I guess we can be grateful no kids are involved.


Who's 'we'? What actual business of yours is it?




Vodafone VDSL:

346 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 1090864 17-Jul-2014 16:04 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

Dratsab:
networkn: I guess we can be grateful no kids are involved.


Who's 'we'? What actual business of yours is it?


no one has to have any business with anyone as such, but when such high profile weddings are in limelight, its out there for people to watch and follow and hence people can take it (marriage)  for granted.

children are worst affected, so its good in a way that there was no such case.

1844 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 165

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090870 17-Jul-2014 16:15 3 people support this post Send private message quote this post

I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming from dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.




Vodafone VDSL:



6725 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 619

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090871 17-Jul-2014 16:16 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

Dratsab: I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.


Say what now?


Awesome
3855 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 368

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090913 17-Jul-2014 17:40 2 people support this post Send private message quote this post

trig42: I saw someone say in the 'debate' leading up to the decision to change the law that Gay Marriages would increase the divorce rate. True that.


True what? One example of a separation (based on conjecture no less) means the divorce rate has increased? and it's because of gay marriage? What data do you have to back up your fauxpinion?




Twitter: ajobbins

BDFL
49198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4173

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090914 17-Jul-2014 17:43 3 people support this post Send private message quote this post

I got divorced in 1999. I helped increase the divorce rate for hetero couples.




1219 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 215

Subscriber

  Reply # 1090917 17-Jul-2014 17:45 4 people support this post Send private message quote this post

One hundred percent of divorces are caused by marriage.

4191 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 266

Trusted

  Reply # 1090920 17-Jul-2014 17:54 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

networkn:
First same sex marriage in NZ didn't last a year!.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11294678

I know not every couple will be like this, but hard to not think it wasn't just done for the free stuff they got.  


Pretty cynical view!

If they've separated (it wasn't confirmed on the piece I saw), then I would imagine it is for similar reasons to those that cause half of heterosexual marriages to fail.

No reason us straight folk should be the only ones to enjoy all the misery of marital separations.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: AndroidNZ.net


282 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 57

Subscriber

  Reply # 1090946 17-Jul-2014 18:38 Send private message quote this post

So apparently are not allowed to make comments about ethics of buying car radar detectors, (thread locked and posts deleted)

But it seems to be ok to revel in someone's marriage breaking up with undertones of homophobia.

Sad.

A.


BDFL
49198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4173

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1090950 17-Jul-2014 18:45 Send private message quote this post

The radar discussion is not locked. The replies that were off topic were removed there because they were off topic.




43 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1090962 17-Jul-2014 18:52 quote this post

Pointless discussion - marriage is legal construct, if there is any meaning beyond that it is purely up to the individuals.

Who cares if shiny things made the couple overzealous - people have been marrying for stuff (visas, politics, dowries, etc.) for thousands of years. 

Opinions about the 'sanctity' or 'commitment' of marriage are just that - opinions. 



546 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1090963 17-Jul-2014 18:53 Send private message quote this post

Dratsab: I can see the point you're trying to make, but 'we' have no concern whether children were involved or not. That's for the parties directly affected. All 'we' (or at least some amongst us) can have is our own sense of self appointed righteousness, which in this case is coming from dross hung out as low-picking fruit by people who don't fact check, twist facts and present unbalanced stories at every opportunity.



I think the point being made, which you may have misinterpreted, was that any possible emotional harm from this possible divorce is limited to the married couple.

2737 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 132

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091102 17-Jul-2014 23:00 Send private message quote this post

andrewNZ: I don't know (or care about) specifics, but they married as soon as they were ALLOWED to. They may have been together and wanting to marry for a long time prior.


Same sex marriage was not illegal under the status quo. The law change merely overturned a legal precedent whereby DIA refused to issue a marriage 'license' to same sex couples. A license which, incidentally, can be substituted for other legal instruments.



6725 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 619

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091112 17-Jul-2014 23:20 Send private message quote this post

MrMistofeles: Pointless discussion - marriage is legal construct, if there is any meaning beyond that it is purely up to the individuals.

Who cares if shiny things made the couple overzealous - people have been marrying for stuff (visas, politics, dowries, etc.) for thousands of years. 

Opinions about the 'sanctity' or 'commitment' of marriage are just that - opinions. 




Did I give any indications that my comments were anything other than my opinion? 90% of what you would find on any forum, geekzone being no exception, are opinions.



6725 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 619

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1091115 17-Jul-2014 23:23 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

NZtechfreak:
networkn:
First same sex marriage in NZ didn't last a year!.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11294678

I know not every couple will be like this, but hard to not think it wasn't just done for the free stuff they got.  


Pretty cynical view!

If they've separated (it wasn't confirmed on the piece I saw), then I would imagine it is for similar reasons to those that cause half of heterosexual marriages to fail.

No reason us straight folk should be the only ones to enjoy all the misery of marital separations.


My opinion is that they got married "because they could" (A very very poor reason). They got a bunch of stuff for being "first". Clearly the commitment wasn't really present to undertake something that deserved better.

Most marriages last better than a year, most people would try and save a marriage for longer than that.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Watch this topic Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Lightbox press event release
Created by freitasm, last reply by Spiker on 1-Aug-2014 07:04 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


New Mobile plans coming?
Created by nunasdream, last reply by tardtasticx on 31-Jul-2014 23:42 (75 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Does acupuncture work?
Created by timmmay, last reply by darkasdes2 on 31-Jul-2014 22:30 (49 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Checking UHF aerial is working
Created by OnceBitten, last reply by B1GGLZ on 28-Jul-2014 21:49 (21 replies)
Pages... 2


2010 Honda Jazz, Suzuki Swift - which has higher maintenance cost?
Created by joker97, last reply by jonathan18 on 31-Jul-2014 10:47 (76 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


2 x PS4s to give away. Geekzone members only.
Created by BigPipeNZ, last reply by bjorn on 31-Jul-2014 15:43 (72 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Hierarchy of a mistake: Gerry Brownlee
Created by joker97, last reply by DonGould on 29-Jul-2014 21:57 (93 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


VF, why you lie to me?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by TimA on 31-Jul-2014 23:52 (69 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.