Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




375 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 67


Topic # 175450 30-Jun-2015 11:56

The Australian PC & Tech Authority mag. has a glowing review of the latest Microsoft Surface and out of several cloud services the Microsoft offering gets the best review.       I fully expect Windows 10 to be reviewed with a headline such as
'Microsoft back on track',    'Microsoft back from the Wilderness', 'Microsoft gets it right at last', 'It's time', etc etc.

Their free  DVD  has the Tiny Core Linux distro, about as non mainstream as they could find!    I've noticed that for the last two years or so that mainstream linux distros. such as Ubuntu and Mint are not featured nearly so much in the Aussie tech magazines.     Sure they cover linux but in such a way that implies it is not for the general user - highly technical type articles.     Could it be that Microsoft and the big PC vendors are telling them that pushing alternative operating systems is really not a great idea?

So, what I am trying to say have these magazines lost their independence in a desperate bid to stay viable?      What do you think?

Create new topic
2907 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 735


  Reply # 1334045 30-Jun-2015 12:01 Send private message

People still buy mags? 

Windows 10 is better than windows 8 so I'd expect to see the headlines you've described anyway. 

Surface pro is great, I'd likely agree with the review. 

But, you could be right, it is the age old struggle between ones bread and butter and integrity -- although, it can only be an opinion as to whether they have given up their integrity.

What did they say about windows 8 when it came out?  If that piece of trash got a good review then I'd believe what you are saying. 



Banana?
3800 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 737

Subscriber

  Reply # 1334046 30-Jun-2015 12:04 Send private message

Maybe the Surface is a great device?
And, Microsoft's cloud service does what they want?

'I expect Windows10 should get pretty good reviews too, after all it will be the dominant OS going forward (still).

I would hope that a magazine of their standing does not take editorial input from it's advertisers, and if it did, declared it. I think you may be looking for a conspiracy where none exists.



375 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 67


  Reply # 1334052 30-Jun-2015 12:12

Yes, good point.    I can't remember what they said about Windows 8.



375 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 67


  Reply # 1334057 30-Jun-2015 12:22

What I'm trying to say is that many advertisers will tolerate a little criticism but not too much.      For example, in the photography magazines, it's common to see a glossy full page advertisement for the latest Nikon or Canon DSLR, and elsewhere in the magazine their will be a review of another Nikon/Canon  camera which praises its good points and very very tactfully mentions one or two  weaknesses.     It's  a matter of realizing that a lot of these mags are a tortuous mix of honesty and pragmatism!!

2668 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 102

Trusted

  Reply # 1334061 30-Jun-2015 12:23 Send private message

Not sure that people actually read tech magazines these days. We have the Internet instead. 




Senior Consultant @Intergen
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.



375 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 67


  Reply # 1334064 30-Jun-2015 12:28

'Not sure that people actually read tech magazines these days. We have the Internet instead.'

Yep!    I browse some but buy few.      What really cracks me up is when someone of a 'certain age' writes in asking for tech. advice about his PC, when the answer could have been found using Google/Bing in a few minutes to half an hour.

2668 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 102

Trusted

  Reply # 1334068 30-Jun-2015 12:36 Send private message

Yep, pretty crazy. I guess magazines aren't economically viable unless you get a big advertiser and then you can't piss them off. The same thing is starting to happen with some online sites. I think Arstechnica is owned by Conde Nast but not sure how that affects their stories. 




Senior Consultant @Intergen
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.

3341 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 350

Trusted

  Reply # 1334090 30-Jun-2015 13:00 Send private message

This is definitely how it works - you pay for what you want printed.

Look at Techday - case in point.





2584 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1257

Subscriber

  Reply # 1334119 30-Jun-2015 13:51 One person supports this post Send private message

So your complaining because the magazines are portraying Linux as an OS not suitable for desktop use by non technical users? 
Even a decent chunk of the diehard linux users I know would agree with that characterisation :-)








Information wants to be free.
The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


12257 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1342


  Reply # 1334130 30-Jun-2015 14:05 Send private message

My general impression of magazines these days, is that a lot of articles tend to be forms of advertorial. I get sent a lot of free magazines, probably to make sure the circulation is high. But I wouldn't buy magazines these days, as more upto date info is on the net.

1558 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 287

Subscriber

  Reply # 1334219 30-Jun-2015 15:40 Send private message

Gave up buying tech mags years ago. It's a wonder any of them are still going.

BDFL - Memuneh
57609 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9245

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1334254 30-Jun-2015 15:59 Send private message

Up until recently I believed in separation of commercial and editorial.

Not anymore.

Solution: don't buy magazines.




Departed
9713 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4072

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1334262 30-Jun-2015 16:04 Send private message

I still buy the occasional magazine such as NZ 4WD, PC Authority, and the odd Linux magazine.




Mike
Retired IT Manager, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
We will remember them.

 

 


3955 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1690


  Reply # 1334683 1-Jul-2015 09:31 One person supports this post Send private message

amiga500: What I'm trying to say is that many advertisers will tolerate a little criticism but not too much.      For example, in the photography magazines, it's common to see a glossy full page advertisement for the latest Nikon or Canon DSLR, and elsewhere in the magazine their will be a review of another Nikon/Canon  camera which praises its good points and very very tactfully mentions one or two  weaknesses.     It's  a matter of realizing that a lot of these mags are a tortuous mix of honesty and pragmatism!!


Considering the fact that ~75-80% of interchangeable lens camera sales are Canon or Nikon and that interchangeable lens camera tend to bought by enthusiasts, and that advertisers would probably choose to target advertising at their target market, then it would be very surprising if a photo enthusiast magazine didn't feature advertisements from the two leading producers of products for that market.
As for your suggestion of editorial bias, then while I'm sure it happens, I'm not convinced that we're any "worse off" these days, unless naive enough to rush to buy expensive new products based on a single review - when there's a world of information at your fingertips. In the good old pre-internet days, write a biased review and I guess you might expect a disgruntled "letter to the editor" which can be thrown in the trash.  Do the same these days - and there will be a reaction.
I have a deep distrust of "user reviews" on the internet.  Shilling is rife at all levels - including "expert" review where expensive equipment is involved.
What I do see these days is that if there's an issue with a product from a market leader like Canon or Nikon, Apple or Samsung, Toyota or VW, Cadbury or Nestle, McDonalds or Burger King, then there's often a hysterical response in social media (in the broad sense - including "specialist" forums etc), yet when second and third tier manufacturers stuff up, you hardly hear of it - unless it's a truly malicious issue.
There even seem to be some fame-seeking folks who devote considerable time tearing things to pieces and looking at product so closely in the hope that they'll find some flaw which would be completely irrelevant to most users, genuinely missed by professional reviewers, then blown out of all proportion.
So - someone saw a mouse in an outdoor kid's play area at a Maccas in South Auckland.  This was headline news. 


gzt

8433 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1031


  Reply # 1335072 1-Jul-2015 14:20 Send private message

Tech Magazines - captured by their big advertisers?

To a large extent this has always been the case with magazines. There is usually less separation between advertising and editorial functions.

Create new topic








Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:






Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.