Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | ... | 223
7176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 888

Trusted

  Reply # 1720410 15-Feb-2017 09:12 Send private message quote this post

MikeB4: Compulsory voting in my view breeches one of the foundations of a free society.

 

I can see that. However, there should also be zero chatter about who only got 25% of the vote.


Displaced Viking
9540 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3943

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1720412 15-Feb-2017 09:18 Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

MikeB4: Compulsory voting in my view breeches one of the foundations of a free society.

 

I can see that. However, there should also be zero chatter about who only got 25% of the vote.

 

 

 

 

That is also a foundation of a free society. If I were in the USA and faced with either voting for Clinton or Trump I would have exercised with right and abstained from voting. That does not remove my right to express an opinion on the final selection.





Mike
Retired IT Manager, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Don't use that mobility toilet if you can use a tree, don't use that mobility park if you can walk from down the road, don't mock that disability be it visible or not and remember it can take but a minute to join us.

 

 

 

 


8125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2236

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1720444 15-Feb-2017 10:28 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

tdgeek:

 

MikeB4: Compulsory voting in my view breeches one of the foundations of a free society.

 

I can see that. However, there should also be zero chatter about who only got 25% of the vote.

 

 

 

 

That is also a foundation of a free society. If I were in the USA and faced with either voting for Clinton or Trump I would have exercised with right and abstained from voting. That does not remove my right to express an opinion on the final selection.

 

 

 

 

Agreed; however it inevitably leads to your opinion being given less weight I suspect.

 

Theoretically I guess that if everyone abstained and no votes were cast, the parties would have to field alternative candidates. However, of course, that would never happen as at least one person would vote - so if one of the two candidates got the single vote that was cast, they would still have won the election....!






1314 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 352


  Reply # 1720452 15-Feb-2017 10:51 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

If I were in the USA and faced with either voting for Clinton or Trump I would have exercised with right and abstained from voting.

 

 

And that reasoning is probably why Trump won. They were both terrible candidates, but one was clearly worse than the other. I firmly believe that if those who didn't vote had chosen to go along and vote for the "lesser of two evils", Trump would not have one.


Displaced Viking
9540 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3943

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1720453 15-Feb-2017 10:55 2 people support this post Send private message quote this post

Paul1977:

 

MikeB4:

 

If I were in the USA and faced with either voting for Clinton or Trump I would have exercised with right and abstained from voting.

 

 

And that reasoning is probably why Trump won. They were both terrible candidates, but one was clearly worse than the other. I firmly believe that if those who didn't vote had chosen to go along and vote for the "lesser of two evils", Trump would not have one.

 

 

 

 

I disagree with voting for the lesser of two evils. I have on occasion not cast a candidate vote in the General election as I did not like any of the candidates, it did however cast party votes. Abstaining is a legitimate voting choice.





Mike
Retired IT Manager, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Don't use that mobility toilet if you can use a tree, don't use that mobility park if you can walk from down the road, don't mock that disability be it visible or not and remember it can take but a minute to join us.

 

 

 

 


1314 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 352


  Reply # 1720471 15-Feb-2017 11:09 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Paul1977:

 

MikeB4:

 

If I were in the USA and faced with either voting for Clinton or Trump I would have exercised with right and abstained from voting.

 

 

And that reasoning is probably why Trump won. They were both terrible candidates, but one was clearly worse than the other. I firmly believe that if those who didn't vote had chosen to go along and vote for the "lesser of two evils", Trump would not have one.

 

 

I disagree with voting for the lesser of two evils. I have on occasion not cast a candidate vote in the General election as I did not like any of the candidates, it did however cast party votes. Abstaining is a legitimate voting choice.

 

 

It is a valid choice, and like you I generally only cast a party vote - mainly because it seems to me the local representative doesn't seem to do much of anything regardless of who it is.

 

However, I think this is quite an unusual case. I mean... Donald J. Trump? This is one instance where one candidate was so awful that I would have been compelled to vote against him.

 

But regardless of whether abstaining is a valid choice or not, I still maintain that Trump would not have won if the non-voters had turned out and voted for who the felt was the "lesser of the two evils".


Displaced Viking
9540 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3943

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1720475 15-Feb-2017 11:15 Send private message quote this post

Paul1977:

 

 

 

It is a valid choice, and like you I generally only cast a party vote - mainly because it seems to me the local representative doesn't seem to do much of anything regardless of who it is.

 

However, I think this is quite an unusual case. I mean... Donald J. Trump? This is one instance where one candidate was so awful that I would have been compelled to vote against him.

 

But regardless of whether abstaining is a valid choice or not, I still maintain that Trump would not have won if the non-voters had turned out and voted for who the felt was the "lesser of the two evils".

 

 

 

 

A better electoral choice for Americans I feel was their feet and the Canadian border.





Mike
Retired IT Manager, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Don't use that mobility toilet if you can use a tree, don't use that mobility park if you can walk from down the road, don't mock that disability be it visible or not and remember it can take but a minute to join us.

 

 

 

 


3877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1647

Subscriber

  Reply # 1720499 15-Feb-2017 11:22 Send private message quote this post

Apparently many refugees who originally chose America are now illegally crossing into Canada, sometimes at great risk to their lives.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


8125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2236

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1720511 15-Feb-2017 11:44 Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Apparently many refugees who originally chose America are now illegally crossing into Canada, sometimes at great risk to their lives.

 

 

 

 

 

 

From bears? Surely not from Canadians.






1314 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 352


  Reply # 1720514 15-Feb-2017 11:46 Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

Rikkitic:

 

Apparently many refugees who originally chose America are now illegally crossing into Canada, sometimes at great risk to their lives.

 

 

From bears? Surely not from Canadians.

 

 

Shoot first, apologize later?


3877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1647

Subscriber

  Reply # 1720545 15-Feb-2017 11:54 Send private message quote this post

From ice and snow, apparently. It is not an easy crossing since they have to avoid populated areas. The Canadians seem to be accepting them with far more generosity than the Americans have.

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


161 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  Reply # 1720561 15-Feb-2017 12:03 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

From ice and snow, apparently. It is not an easy crossing since they have to avoid populated areas. The Canadians seem to be accepting them with far more generosity than the Americans have.

 

 

 

Bigger fool them for ignoring the lessons of France, Belgium, Sweden and Germany etc.


1203 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 1720566 15-Feb-2017 12:07 Send private message quote this post

Canadian newspaper the Toronto Star has an ongoing list of Trump falsehoods:
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/02/03/daniel-dales-donald-trump-fact-check-updates.html

322 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 18


  Reply # 1720570 15-Feb-2017 12:14 2 people support this post Send private message quote this post

JayADee: Canadian newspaper the Toronto Star has an ongoing list of Trump falsehoods:
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/02/03/daniel-dales-donald-trump-fact-check-updates.html

 

 

It's 4 or 5 days out-of-date. Maybe they can't keep up with the pace of his spouting of alternative facts?


3877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1647

Subscriber

  Reply # 1721050 16-Feb-2017 10:23 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

Another one bites the dust. Even the American taste for junk food has its limits:

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/15/politics/top-senate-republicans-urge-white-house-to-withdraw-puzder-nomination/index.html?adkey=bn

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1 | ... | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | ... | 223
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic






Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:






Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.