Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | ... | 265
531 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  Reply # 945716 4-Dec-2013 22:06 Send private message quote this post

TL;DR Downgraded Fritz firmware to 99.05.22. Back on DLM1. Happy!

Thought I would share another firmware downgrade success story. I must apologise for the lack of screenshots. I wasn't intending to make a post on this but since a few people have been talking about downgrading recently, I thought I should share.

Here's what everything looked like back in July when my Snap VDSL went live, using the latest firmware:


Given all those errors it wasn't surprising that DLM kicked in and I moved to DLM2 and then finally settled on DLM4. From this point I would get a resync maybe once a month where I would move from DLM4 to DLM2 and then back again as the error rates crept back up. My line sync also settled in around the 47000-48000 mark. I was happy, the speed was good, but we all know us geeks like to tinker...

On November 13 I finally got around to downgrading the firmware on my Fritz 7340 to the 99.05.22 version, and then proceeded to let DLM do it's thing naturally. I know I could have called Snap and got them to do a manual reset, but at the same time I was interested to see what would happen if left on it's own. I'm assuming at this point I was on DLM4 - hard to say as I believe the .22 firmware seems to report the INP values as zero even if that isn't true. I was on DLM4 before the downgrade. One noticeable difference was the lack of CRC errors, they were zero, where-as on the latest firmware it was always reporting a value <1 per minute.

On December 1 I had a resync which I believe moved me to DLM2, again hard to tell. Still zero errors.

On December 3 I had another resync and this time we were back at DLM1! The first thing I noticed was the CRC errors heading towards values of about 400 per hour. At this point I promptly changed the Line Settings (since they actually work on this version):



This resulted in a slight drop in download speed as expected, but it's still enough for my needs. Currently this is what I'm seeing (stable since 6am December 3):



So, if you're considering downgrading, my advice is to do it. This version behaves so much better and I'm yet to see any downside.



1325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 156

Trusted

  Reply # 945722 4-Dec-2013 22:16 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

@Kraven: Thanks for sharing that! Odd that you were dropped from DLM-1 originally; our testing has shown that a CRCPM up to 10 is fine on DLM-1, but I guess there may be other factors also at play.

Assuming your error levels stay low, you could probably go a bit lower (towards performance) on the SNRM as well IMO.

531 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  Reply # 945742 4-Dec-2013 22:35 Send private message quote this post

SamF: @Kraven: Thanks for sharing that! Odd that you were dropped from DLM-1 originally; our testing has shown that a CRCPM up to 10 is fine on DLM-1, but I guess there may be other factors also at play.

Assuming your error levels stay low, you could probably go a bit lower (towards performance) on the SNRM as well IMO.


That screenshot was shortly after plugging everything in. Over the next few hours those errors ramped up to values much, much higher.

I may look at lowering the SNRM but for the sake of a couple of Mbps it's not worth going through the whole DLM process again, I like my 12ms ping to work too much ;)



1325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 156

Trusted

  Reply # 945745 4-Dec-2013 22:43 Send private message quote this post

Yeah fair enough. Looks like you have some room to move if you want to tho, which is nice.

2851 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 756

Trusted

  Reply # 945750 4-Dec-2013 22:50 Send private message quote this post

SamF: @Kraven: Thanks for sharing that! Odd that you were dropped from DLM-1 originally; our testing has shown that a CRCPM up to 10 is fine on DLM-1, but I guess there may be other factors also at play.



My last drop from DLM1 to 2 happened with CRCPM well under 10; closer to 5 I think or not much over - which was odd because as you know I've run with much higher for extended periods previously. As far as I could see nothing else had really changed.   I subsequently raised the TSNRM a bit to drop errors back down and after a good few weeks went back to DLM1 but haven't bothered to push the TSNRM back down since then.  Perhaps they've dropped the threshold?  Or yeah, other factors at play.



1325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 156

Trusted

  Reply # 945772 4-Dec-2013 23:11 Send private message quote this post

Resyncs seem to play a large roll.

'That VDSL Cat'
5228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 948

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 945779 4-Dec-2013 23:43 Send private message quote this post

SamF: Resyncs seem to play a large roll.


this. i was sitting with my slightly high CRC errors perfectly fine on DLM-1, until someone decided they were gonna try to find a cable to connect to the internet with....

seems to be about 2~3 resyncs in a day, and DLM-1 is gone.




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


193 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  Reply # 946098 5-Dec-2013 15:31 Send private message quote this post

So I've got something VERY interesting for you guys, one of my customers whos VDSL we've litterally just setup (within the last few hours), didn't even get a look in at 8b. litterally straight onto a 17a profile

Heres a picture to have a gawk at


'That VDSL Cat'
5228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 948

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 946099 5-Dec-2013 15:45 Send private message quote this post

Dairusire: So I've got something VERY interesting for you guys, one of my customers whos VDSL we've litterally just setup (within the last few hours), didn't even get a look in at 8b. litterally straight onto a 17a profile

Heres a picture to have a gawk at



this seems VERY odd.. what attenuation is he at? distance from the cabinet?

am i reading the SNR correctly there? says its measured in 0.1db, so wouldnt that be 1.1db SNR? or is that possibly a firmware bug in the draytek?




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


217 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 946589 6-Dec-2013 14:02 Send private message quote this post

Kraven: TL;DR Downgraded Fritz firmware to 99.05.22. Back on DLM1. Happy!


How can I get a copy of older firmware?

Dean

'That VDSL Cat'
5228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 948

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 946626 6-Dec-2013 15:09 Send private message quote this post

attewell:
Kraven: TL;DR Downgraded Fritz firmware to 99.05.22. Back on DLM1. Happy!


How can I get a copy of older firmware?

Dean


check the service ftp server.

ftp://service.avm.de/Downgrade/




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


193 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  Reply # 946636 6-Dec-2013 15:41 Send private message quote this post

hio77:
Dairusire: So I've got something VERY interesting for you guys, one of my customers whos VDSL we've litterally just setup (within the last few hours), didn't even get a look in at 8b. litterally straight onto a 17a profile

Heres a picture to have a gawk at



this seems VERY odd.. what attenuation is he at? distance from the cabinet?

am i reading the SNR correctly there? says its measured in 0.1db, so wouldnt that be 1.1db SNR? or is that possibly a firmware bug in the draytek?


Yeah the SNR reading is probably a glitch. When we ran a pre-qual test on his lines it came back as a 1-1 attenuation.

'That VDSL Cat'
5228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 948

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 946649 6-Dec-2013 15:51 Send private message quote this post

Dairusire:
hio77:
Dairusire: So I've got something VERY interesting for you guys, one of my customers whos VDSL we've litterally just setup (within the last few hours), didn't even get a look in at 8b. litterally straight onto a 17a profile

Heres a picture to have a gawk at



this seems VERY odd.. what attenuation is he at? distance from the cabinet?

am i reading the SNR correctly there? says its measured in 0.1db, so wouldnt that be 1.1db SNR? or is that possibly a firmware bug in the draytek?


Yeah the SNR reading is probably a glitch. When we ran a pre-qual test on his lines it came back as a 1-1 attenuation.


definitely under that 200M mark then.


whats the real world attenuation? 1-1, ild pick about a 2~3?


looks like DLM picked the distance and switched 17a straight away, interesting to see indeed, considering it takes most weeks+ to see 17a pop




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


193 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  Reply # 946651 6-Dec-2013 15:54 Send private message quote this post

hio77:
Dairusire:
hio77:
Dairusire: So I've got something VERY interesting for you guys, one of my customers whos VDSL we've litterally just setup (within the last few hours), didn't even get a look in at 8b. litterally straight onto a 17a profile

Heres a picture to have a gawk at



this seems VERY odd.. what attenuation is he at? distance from the cabinet?

am i reading the SNR correctly there? says its measured in 0.1db, so wouldnt that be 1.1db SNR? or is that possibly a firmware bug in the draytek?


Yeah the SNR reading is probably a glitch. When we ran a pre-qual test on his lines it came back as a 1-1 attenuation.


definitely under that 200M mark then.


whats the real world attenuation? 1-1, ild pick about a 2~3?


looks like DLM picked the distance and switched 17a straight away, interesting to see indeed, considering it takes most weeks+ to see 17a pop


Nah, their attenuation is 1. Its not more than this, because well the cabinet is litterally on their front lawn and their pair runs directly from the cabinet to their comms room lol



1325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 156

Trusted

  Reply # 946652 6-Dec-2013 15:55 Send private message quote this post

We've seen people go straight onto 17a before, and this appears to be a very good line, so it's not unheard of.

1 | ... | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | ... | 265
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

True Key by Intel Security adopts Windows Hello
Posted 7-Dec-2016 20:36


Spark moves to 200Gbps wavelength milestone
Posted 7-Dec-2016 16:00


Xero adds Apple Pay
Posted 7-Dec-2016 11:28


Review new Apple MacBook Pro 2016 (13-inch)
Posted 6-Dec-2016 10:08


50Mbps the new fibre normal
Posted 6-Dec-2016 07:02


Microsoft and Netsafe issue fresh warning about scammers
Posted 5-Dec-2016 19:21



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.