Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
1135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 128


  Reply # 712167 5-Nov-2012 12:04 Send private message

mercutio:
hamish225:
Ragnor:
sbiddle: The challenge for Chorus / LFC's and ISP's is actually engineering the CIR - in effect allocating 2.5Mbps of guaranteed traffic to users when this bandwidth will sit dormant for most of the time.

Apart from the odd issue EUBA has worked relatively well with no per user dimensioning.


It doesn't matter because probably no one is going to use the voip port on the ONT nor the CIR tagged traffic for consumer plans.

Pretty much every ISP is just using EUBA0, not bothering with vlan tagging and just sending voip over the best effort internet bandwidth then doing some QoS/management/engineering of traffic inside the ISP network to smooth things out.

This is probably going to continue for UFB

Having CIR's for special tagged traffic on the consumer bitstream offerings seem like a retarded waste of time to me.

Business plans sure.


maybe they should make regualr http traffic have the 2.5Mb/s cir, so that the guy down the road with the dedicated torrent machine doesn't slow down the tech savvyy grandma who likes to browse trademe quickly?


2.5megabit/sec isn't quick.



still better than nothing i guess, why even have it then, what's the point?













Voice Engineer @ Orcon
1777 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 380

Trusted
Orcon
Subscriber

  Reply # 712208 5-Nov-2012 13:05 Send private message

Non CIR traffic is treated "fairly" so someone leaching won't get "all teh bandwidths".  If saturation is reached in any part of the network, packets will be queued and/or discarded at random from all connections.

Also, the network is provisioned so there is "at least" the CIR available per connection, and it's very unlikely that tagged traffic will ever saturate that.

You can't simply prioritise "all traffic" - it defeats the whole purpose.  And defining more levels (ie. AFxx for HTTP traffic) would just add a lot of complexity for IMO little benefit.

108 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19

Trusted
Snap Internet

  Reply # 713392 7-Nov-2012 10:23 Send private message

freitasm: I mean someone told me there's a suspicion why some UFB connections are not performing as well as intended. Apparently not all ISPs are aware and some are investigating. Let's see what they find.


I've just caught something nasty on EUBA and I'm proceeding to investigate UFB with the same idea in mind. Surprising. I'm actually an advocate for Chorus' network normally, as overall I've seen very good performance in recent years (really since the 7302 upgrade/Ethernet backhaul project).




“I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... Such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything.” - Nikola Tesla

Disclaimer: Views expressed in my posts do not necessarily reflect those views of my employer.



60 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 716126 13-Nov-2012 01:19

Dump... Snap has been quiet about this.

154 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 716134 13-Nov-2012 06:35 Send private message

SneakerPimps: Asus RTN-16 with Tomato firmware.

I'll give the direct connection a go, but I'm pretty sure the router I have is capable of the throughput.


That RT-N16 is awful. I have one too, it's a piece of sh*t. I doubt however that it's the router's fault at all because I get 18Mbps easy on ADSL2 going through it.

414 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 77


  Reply # 716247 13-Nov-2012 11:11 Send private message

<3 my N16. It can easily handle 100mb both up and down. Would be nice if it had 5ghz wireless too, but that's not a big issue.



60 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 716251 13-Nov-2012 11:22

I've deployed about a dozen of the RT-N16 with Tomato and it's solid, never had an issue with it. bisr you would be first person I've heard to speak bad of it :/.

It's not a router issue because what I'm experiencing is mainly international speed. Plus I've tried another router now, and it performs the same.


//EDIT - ACTUALLY, I take that back. I've just tested this again now and it seems to be fixed!!!!


108 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19

Trusted
Snap Internet

  Reply # 716260 13-Nov-2012 11:32 Send private message

SneakerPimps, can you please try the following:

http://test1.snap.net.nz/test-file-100m

Let me know the speed this downloads, both single-threaded and multi-threaded.

Can you also please PM me your username, so I can set up a graph of latency to you, also to track packet loss.

Thanks,
Tim




“I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... Such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything.” - Nikola Tesla

Disclaimer: Views expressed in my posts do not necessarily reflect those views of my employer.



60 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 716263 13-Nov-2012 11:37

1 Thread = ~2MB/s
4 Threads = ~3.1MB/s

414 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 77


  Reply # 716297 13-Nov-2012 12:27 Send private message

That speedtest.net result is possibly inaccurate. Snap seem to have started caching HTTP, including speedtest.net, so you can no longer use it to test international speeds. :(
See here: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=90&topicid=111499



60 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 716316 13-Nov-2012 12:44

hhmmm interesting.

I'll be able to tell more later, but just quickly checking, most links on this thread to test download files have almost double in speed. (from 150KB to ~300KB/sec).

Improvement yes, but at least it's a start.

1078 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 45


  Reply # 716321 13-Nov-2012 12:50 Send private message

Lorenceo: That speedtest.net result is possibly inaccurate. Snap seem to have started caching HTTP, including speedtest.net, so you can no longer use it to test international speeds. :(
See here: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=90&topicid=111499


speedtest.net uses unique requests for each "random image" that it uses to download, and so even if things force-cache the content, it'll just take up lots of cache space.

so you'll have a request like: 

http://speed.snap.net.nz/speedtest/random1500x1500.jpg?

then a random number after the ? .. you can request the image yourself and see it just looks like random pixels.

but with the http download, you should be able to accomplish the same thing with that 100mb speed test in fremont (california) by appending ?129321039812903812 or some other random number to it, and increment it every time you do a new test.


19 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 716568 13-Nov-2012 17:42 Send private message

quakeguy: SneakerPimps, can you please try the following:

http://test1.snap.net.nz/test-file-100m

Let me know the speed this downloads, both single-threaded and multi-threaded.

Can you also please PM me your username, so I can set up a graph of latency to you, also to track packet loss.

Thanks,
Tim


Snap UFB 30M customer here. My downloads are pretty poor too -

 root@nucleus:/tmp# time wget http://test1.snap.net.nz/test-file-100m
--2012-11-13 17:47:37-- http://test1.snap.net.nz/test-file-100m
Resolving test1.snap.net.nz... 64.71.180.170
Connecting to test1.snap.net.nz|64.71.180.170|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [text/plain]
Saving to: `test-file-100m'

100%[=================================================>] 104,857,600 1.48M/s in 63s

2012-11-13 17:48:40 (1.60 MB/s) - `test-file-100m' saved [104857600/104857600]


real 1m2.942s
user 0m0.088s
sys 0m1.324s







19268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1143

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 716583 13-Nov-2012 18:17 Send private message

I'd still really love somebody who's experiencing slow speeds and has the technical knowledge to run some tests using the high priority CIR on their connection rather than just their EIR.

I'm just curious if the connection is actually meeting the specs for the UFB product which is only around the CIR, not the EIR which at the end of the day is all best effort traffic and congestion could be occuring at many points along the way.



414 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 77


  Reply # 716642 13-Nov-2012 19:34 Send private message

mercutio: speedtest.net uses unique requests for each "random image" that it uses to download, and so even if things force-cache the content, it'll just take up lots of cache space.

so you'll have a request like: 

http://speed.snap.net.nz/speedtest/random1500x1500.jpg?

then a random number after the ? .. you can request the image yourself and see it just looks like random pixels.

but with the http download, you should be able to accomplish the same thing with that 100mb speed test in fremont (california) by appending ?129321039812903812 or some other random number to it, and increment it every time you do a new test.

I just tried this, with a bunch of different number strings. The MD5 of the files that it downloads are the same, and they all came in at line speed. Even when supposedly coming from Africa.

1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Does acupuncture work?
Created by timmmay, last reply by geekiegeek on 30-Jul-2014 13:48 (27 replies)
Pages... 2


New Mobile plans coming?
Created by nunasdream, last reply by quickymart on 30-Jul-2014 22:50 (23 replies)
Pages... 2


2 x PS4s to give away. Geekzone members only.
Created by BigPipeNZ, last reply by pinkydot on 30-Jul-2014 22:58 (65 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


2010 Honda Jazz, Suzuki Swift - which has higher maintenance cost?
Created by joker97, last reply by joker97 on 30-Jul-2014 17:40 (65 replies)
Pages... 3 4 5


Checking UHF aerial is working
Created by OnceBitten, last reply by B1GGLZ on 28-Jul-2014 21:49 (21 replies)
Pages... 2


VF, why you lie to me?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by MadEngineer on 30-Jul-2014 22:05 (55 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Hierarchy of a mistake: Gerry Brownlee
Created by joker97, last reply by DonGould on 29-Jul-2014 21:57 (93 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


"keyless" keys - questions
Created by joker97, last reply by MadEngineer on 30-Jul-2014 22:02 (35 replies)
Pages... 2 3



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.