Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.



1575 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 221


Topic # 100757 18-Apr-2012 13:07 Send private message

It will be amusing in that household when mum and dad wonder why the internet is cutoff. 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/6760917/Copyright-three-strikes-first-infringer

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
3016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 199

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 611133 18-Apr-2012 13:33 Send private message

I wonder what happens if they are in contract? Lol imagine spending 50k getting fibre installed then for it to be cut off after a month ;p

Doesn't apply as internet cut off is no available yet.





2391 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 292
Inactive user


  Reply # 611138 18-Apr-2012 13:35 Send private message

surfisup1000: It will be amusing in that household when mum and dad wonder why the internet is cutoff. 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/6760917/Copyright-three-strikes-first-infringer
HA HA

Then a fine of up to a $15k.

Maybe its time New Zealand will wake up to the anti-piracy laws.

[sarcasm]
And just maybe 5GB per month is actually more than enough
[/sarcasm]

245 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 611159 18-Apr-2012 14:32 Send private message

Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.

16528 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1416

Trusted
Vodafone NZ

  Reply # 611162 18-Apr-2012 14:33 Send private message

Mauricio?




1161 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 611163 18-Apr-2012 14:33 Send private message

Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.


The infringer probably should have bought the music in the first place instead of downloading it illegally 




Apple: Have it their way
Android: Have it your way

2391 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 292
Inactive user


  Reply # 611166 18-Apr-2012 14:37 Send private message

Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.


LOL How much illegal downloading do you do?


1767 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 45

Trusted

  Reply # 611171 18-Apr-2012 14:43 Send private message

semigeek:
Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.


The infringer probably should have bought the music in the first place instead of downloading it?illegally?

Yes, they should have just got it from YouTube.

89 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 611183 18-Apr-2012 14:57 Send private message

The tribunal can impose a fine of up to $15,000 for serious, flagrant offences under the law, which was designed to discourage people from pirating music and movies using file-sharing services.

However, the Government signalled in a Cabinet paper last year that in some cases it might be sufficient punishment for offenders to reimburse rights holders for the $275 in fees they will have had to incur bringing a case to the tribunal. It has no powers to cut off people's internet access.


This made me laugh


EDIT: forgot to add my part :/

2885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Trusted

  Reply # 611185 18-Apr-2012 14:59 Send private message

Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.

Is online really more popular than CD now?

89 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 611187 18-Apr-2012 15:00 Send private message

bazzer:
Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.

Is online really more popular than CD now?


i don't remember the last physical CD i bought, the last physical music i got was a MxPx LP so it wasn't even a CD

1432 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 138

Trusted

  Reply # 611223 18-Apr-2012 15:46 Send private message

almaznz:
bazzer:
Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.

Is online really more popular than CD now?


i don't remember the last physical CD i bought, the last physical music i got was a MxPx LP so it wasn't even a CD


I still buy CDs for quality reasons, once higher resolution downloads become the norm I will stop. I have stopped downloading movies though due mainly to itunes US. Only thing left is TV :-)




"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.

245 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 611224 18-Apr-2012 15:46 Send private message

BraaiGuy:
Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.


LOL How much illegal downloading do you do?



I use youtube other free sources like grooveshark, i already on a large collection of CDs.  Popular music are so accessible and cheap these days there is no need to infringe.  Mine point is, for the general infringements it would be more beneficial financially for the rights holder to educate and incentivise then to threaten Internet cut-off.  Why not send an iTunes or digirama voucher in the first warning for example?  This would also educate the infringer that there are legitimate and cheap ways to get the same content.

214 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  Reply # 611442 18-Apr-2012 20:20 Send private message

Kiwipixter:
BraaiGuy:
Kiwipixter: Stupid law and doesn't make business sense for the rights holder. The Internet is the main source for purchasing digital music, by cutting off the Internet prevents the infringer from buy the content legitimately. Thats just stupid.


LOL How much illegal downloading do you do?



I use youtube other free sources like grooveshark, i already on a large collection of CDs.  Popular music are so accessible and cheap these days there is no need to infringe.  Mine point is, for the general infringements it would be more beneficial financially for the rights holder to educate and incentivise then to threaten Internet cut-off.  Why not send an iTunes or digirama voucher in the first warning for example?  This would also educate the infringer that there are legitimate and cheap ways to get the same content.


A voucher? Seriously? Reward people for breaking the law?

108 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 611491 18-Apr-2012 21:23 Send private message

TelstraClear user? Want to bet its a cable (i.e. static IP) user?


BDFL
49992 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4645

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 611518 18-Apr-2012 21:43 Send private message

It doesn't matter if it's static or dynamic, ISPs would be able to identify users regardless.




 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

How good is your general Science Knowledge?
Created by Aredwood, last reply by joker97 on 31-Oct-2014 23:44 (39 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Government Limos
Created by networkn, last reply by Bung on 31-Oct-2014 12:39 (94 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Snap refuses to replace faulty gear
Created by Brendan, last reply by MadEngineer on 28-Oct-2014 19:07 (92 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Shutup and take my money (via NFC on my mobile phone)
Created by sxz, last reply by sonyxperiageek on 31-Oct-2014 22:34 (24 replies)
Pages... 2


OneDrive code giveaway - go!
Created by freitasm, last reply by NightOnTheWeb on 1-Nov-2014 08:57 (35 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Uber: a cheaper taxi ride?
Created by kingdragonfly, last reply by livisun on 31-Oct-2014 14:47 (34 replies)
Pages... 2 3


DDos Protection from ISP
Created by charsleysa, last reply by freitasm on 31-Oct-2014 12:11 (46 replies)
Pages... 2 3 4


Sky will be 'upgrading software' of My Sky to connect to internet. What does that mean?
Created by Geektastic, last reply by Jase2985 on 1-Nov-2014 07:06 (28 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.