Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
2391 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 292
Inactive user


  Reply # 976424 29-Jan-2014 08:37 Send private message

Good on Labour. I fully support them on this one because it means they will get even less support in the next elections ...


2354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 282

Trusted
Microsoft NZ

  Reply # 976426 29-Jan-2014 08:43 One person supports this post Send private message

You'd think a Finance spokesperson would know that companies pay tax on profits not turnover

700 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 148


  Reply # 976428 29-Jan-2014 08:47 Send private message

freitasm:

They are not doing tax evasion. They have very good accountants that know that by using companies in some places they can pay less tax. Legally.



This is probably true (avoidance rather than evasion) - but might not be.  Profit shifting as a means to tax minimisation is illegal in most countries, but it's effectively unenforceable globally.
It's probably yet another example of a Wicked Problem which is going to continue to defy satisfactory resolution. 
Worse, the general public seem to be more suspicious of the motives of governments and authorities such as the IMF and World Bank calling for reform, than the global corporates and "loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires" who seem to be calling all the shots, rejecting all suggestions for reform.

3063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 997


  Reply # 976432 29-Jan-2014 08:52 Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
KiwiNZ:
freitasm: Here is where you are wrong. These site's online activities are not illegal.

They are not doing tax evasion. They have very good accountants that know that by using companies in some places they can pay less tax. Legally.

Deal with it. It's not illegal. The government has a loophole in the tax system. Get the MPs to close it with a new reformed tax law. But don't come with crap about closing sites because it can be used for other things.


I was not referring to these sites, I was referring to non specific sites in response to your post re banning on the internet.

Clearly Googles and Facebooks activity is not illegal. I am saying that as with any part of society the legsl closure of illegal activity is a sanction the judiciary should have at its disposal.


Sounds nice in theory, but even aside from the 'slippery slope' argument there is also the problem that it is virtually impossible in practice to have a real impact

For a start, The Nz government has no jurisdiction to shut down websites hosted in other countries.

They could, in theory, get ISPs to filter out websites such as pirate bay, as they try in the uk, but actually getting that to happen will cost millions AND it won't work because anybody can use a VPN to get around any sort of ISP filtering.


Of course NZ Government can do squat about overseas based operations, but NZ sites and companies it can. EG a guy in say Utiku starts a web site peddling illegal porn, the judiciary should be able to take that site down.




Mike

 Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic.

BDFL
49459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4350

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976442 29-Jan-2014 09:05 Send private message

I don't always share Kiwiblog posts, but when I do... http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/01/labour_jumps_the_shark.html.




BDFL
49459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4350

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976443 29-Jan-2014 09:06 Send private message

KiwiNZ: Of course NZ Government can do squat about overseas based operations, but NZ sites and companies it can. EG a guy in say Utiku starts a web site peddling illegal porn, the judiciary should be able to take that site down.


But the discussion is about tax evasion, not child abuse/pr0n. This sounds like trying to move the target away from the original quote.






700 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 148


  Reply # 976445 29-Jan-2014 09:12 One person supports this post Send private message

freitasm:
KiwiNZ: Of course NZ Government can do squat about overseas based operations, but NZ sites and companies it can. EG a guy in say Utiku starts a web site peddling illegal porn, the judiciary should be able to take that site down.


But the discussion is about tax evasion, not child abuse/pr0n. This sounds like trying to move the target away from the original quote.




Are you suggesting that tax evasion is "victimless" ?

3450 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 341

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976448 29-Jan-2014 09:15 Send private message

I think he means Tax Avoidance

61 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 976461 29-Jan-2014 09:32 One person supports this post Send private message

“Fine print, he’s going to close down Facebook,” says Prime Minister John Key. “That’ll be interesting.”


Key is awesome. He always handles these things with class.

3063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 997


  Reply # 976463 29-Jan-2014 09:36 Send private message

freitasm:
KiwiNZ: Of course NZ Government can do squat about overseas based operations, but NZ sites and companies it can. EG a guy in say Utiku starts a web site peddling illegal porn, the judiciary should be able to take that site down.


But the discussion is about tax evasion, not child abuse/pr0n. This sounds like trying to move the target away from the original quote.




I was following on from  "Welcome to your new Labour Overlords, who will one day cull dissent by blocking sites and services. Oh sure, some folks will say it will never happen. Right." 




Mike

 Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic.

1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 175

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976547 29-Jan-2014 11:12 Send private message

As has been stated a few times, sites like Facebook and Google are not doing anything illegal. There legal means to avoiding tax in this country and many companies exploit this. Peter Dunne (MP) describes it as "legitimate tax avoidance".




Vodafone VDSL:

1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 175

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976548 29-Jan-2014 11:12 Send private message

As has been stated a few times, sites like Facebook and Google are not doing anything illegal. There legal means to avoiding tax in this country and many companies exploit this. Peter Dunne (MP) describes it as "legitimate tax avoidance".




Vodafone VDSL:

Awesome
3939 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 473

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976569 29-Jan-2014 11:48 Send private message

The government should have the ability to block sites (or require ISPs to) only after a court order from a judge where they found guilty of (and continue to) illegal activity.

As soon as you give govt means to shut down what ever they feel or decided doesn't suit their interests, it leaves the door wide open for abuse. And as Mauricio pointed out, once you give them that power, good luck taking it away.




Twitter: ajobbins

1305 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 232


  Reply # 976856 29-Jan-2014 18:55 3 people support this post Send private message

Perhaps the Labour Party should take the moral high ground and lead by example - by removing its Facebook page, requiring all its MPs to surrender all their Apple devices, and changing the settings on its websites so that they are no longer indexed/searchable by Google?

No..... thought not!

292 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 52

Subscriber

  Reply # 976933 29-Jan-2014 22:06 Send private message

Problem is, where do you stop?

Any overseas company that imports stuff has been doing this for years. Overseas HQ charges the NZ company (aka division) high prices for whatever products they import. This means the NZ company makes hardly any profit while the overseas HQ makes large profits.

There would have to be some sort of court. Whose sole purpose it to figure out if these prices charged between overseas companies and their NZ divisions are fair. Yet imagine the compliance costs that would create.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Vodafone TV multicast settings on pfSense?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by chrispchikin on 22-Aug-2014 22:36 (133 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


CGA. Is it fair?
Created by BTR, last reply by bazzer on 22-Aug-2014 11:02 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Lightbox press event release
Created by freitasm, last reply by Lightbox on 22-Aug-2014 17:04 (469 replies)
Pages... 30 31 32


It was hardly 'hacking' was it?
Created by CB_24, last reply by gzt on 21-Aug-2014 22:26 (97 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Free: Smart Button for your Android device
Created by freitasm, last reply by pinkbellbird on 23-Aug-2014 12:11 (105 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Warning about Pure Hosting
Created by LostBoyNZ, last reply by Zeon on 23-Aug-2014 00:15 (34 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Vodafone now charging you to receive a bill via post
Created by stocksp, last reply by Linuxluver on 22-Aug-2014 19:45 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Does an HRV system actually "dry" the air?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by mattwnz on 22-Aug-2014 17:32 (17 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.