Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.



2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

Topic # 59157 29-Mar-2010 09:31 Send private message

This is interesting.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/telecoms/article7078798.ece








View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2

ajw

986 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 314557 4-Apr-2010 08:22 Send private message

Geektastic: This is interesting.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/telecoms/article7078798.ece




This is a better article on the same subject.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/02/technology/02rates.html 



2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 314559 4-Apr-2010 08:30 Send private message

I wonder what those fees are here and whether anyone will regulate them?








19751 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1496

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 314560 4-Apr-2010 08:42 Send private message

Geektastic: I wonder what those fees are here and whether anyone will regulate them?


You obviously haven't been following the MTAS regulation saga that's been very public and had a lot of media attention over the past 12 months.


ajw

986 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 314562 4-Apr-2010 08:45 Send private message

Geektastic: I wonder what those fees are here and whether anyone will regulate them?



Currently 15 cents per minute to terminate a mobile to mobile voice call. In regards regulation the Minister Stephen Joyce is currently looking at whether vdone and telecoms undertakings be accepted or to regulate or to return to the Commerce Commission for more investigation.



2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 314563 4-Apr-2010 08:46 Send private message

Not really - on the face of it it does not seem to be about exactly the same aspect though:

"The Commission's investigation did not look at the prices that consumers directly pay for mobile services."  

I just never get the impression that regulation here is really aimed at telling the companies what they can charge us! 








BDFL
49896 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4615

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 314565 4-Apr-2010 08:49 Send private message

Some telcos say these "fees" don't influence their prices. In effect what they are saying is "it doesn't matter how much our costs are, we charge whatever we feel customers will pay without churning too much".




19751 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1496

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 314566 4-Apr-2010 08:50 Send private message

Geektastic: Not really - on the face of it it does not seem to be about exactly the same aspect though:

"The Commission's investigation did not look at the prices that consumers directly pay for mobile services."  

I just never get the impression that regulation here is really aimed at telling the companies what they can charge us! 


It's not. And it would be very, very scary if the Commerce Commission was going around regulating retail prices of products. This would in effect be making price fixing legal and would be anti competitive.

ajw

986 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 314568 4-Apr-2010 08:52 Send private message

freitasm: Some telcos say these "fees" don't influence their prices. In effect what they are saying is "it doesn't matter how much our costs are, we charge whatever we feel customers will pay without churning too much".



Especially roaming charges check out the link.

http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/ringing-up-global-roaming-charges-3446479/video




aw



2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 314575 4-Apr-2010 09:06 Send private message

sbiddle:
Geektastic: Not really - on the face of it it does not seem to be about exactly the same aspect though:

"The Commission's investigation did not look at the prices that consumers directly pay for mobile services."  

I just never get the impression that regulation here is really aimed at telling the companies what they can charge us! 


It's not. And it would be very, very scary if the Commerce Commission was going around regulating retail prices of products. This would in effect be making price fixing legal and would be anti competitive.


And yet the European Union does that all the time.

As do Ofwat, Ofgen, Ofgas, Oftel etc in the UK.

It isn't anti competitive unless you are giving the advantage to only one person.

If you are protecting the consumer and making ALL the companies charge a reasonable rate that has been justified in written submissions, I would not consider that anti-competitive. 










2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 314576 4-Apr-2010 09:10 Send private message

ajw:
freitasm: Some telcos say these "fees" don't influence their prices. In effect what they are saying is "it doesn't matter how much our costs are, we charge whatever we feel customers will pay without churning too much".



Especially roaming charges check out the link.

http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/ringing-up-global-roaming-charges-3446479/video


OMG!!

That's outrageous. The excuses offered by the telcos were weak and feeble to say the least. 








BDFL
49896 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4615

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 314582 4-Apr-2010 09:23 Send private message

There are plenty of warning to people roaming. It's probably that people don't believe the prices are that high. It's not a new story - roaming rates have been high for years, have not come down at all or not quick enough.

It's unbelivable in the case of mobile roaming that a company can offer 100MB for $10 for their local users, but the data automagically changes prices if servicing a visiting tourist or business person.




19751 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1496

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 314583 4-Apr-2010 09:23 Send private message

Geektastic:
ajw:
freitasm: Some telcos say these "fees" don't influence their prices. In effect what they are saying is "it doesn't matter how much our costs are, we charge whatever we feel customers will pay without churning too much".



Especially roaming charges check out the link.

http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/ringing-up-global-roaming-charges-3446479/video


OMG!!

That's outrageous. The excuses offered by the telcos were weak and feeble to say the least. 


Why? What is wrong with the current system? Surely it comes down to personal responbility of an end user to be aware of the costs of a product or service before they use it? All networks send you a SMS advising of pricing when your phone roams to a foreign networks and yet not a week goes by when somebody ignores this, uses their phone and then complains about the pricing.

Are you suggesting that the NZ government force companies in other countries to regulate their prices? You've got to be joking.

Global roaming prices are not high because Vodafone, Telecom or 2degrees are ripping us off. They are high because foreign networks set wholesale prices. The prices we pay for voice calling while roaming are not excessive by global standards, particularly if you're on VF's regular roaming plan which works out significantly cheaper than Telecom or Vodafone Traveller if you make national calls while roaming.

Our data pricing could be a little sharper as it's now possible to buy data roaming bundles on many networks incl Vodafone UK which work out at around NZ$2 per MB when you're roaming on other VF networks but the problem is the wholesale cost of data on many other networks is excessive (ie NZ$5 + wholesale).

ajw

986 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 314587 4-Apr-2010 09:33 Send private message

sbiddle:
Geektastic:
ajw:
freitasm: Some telcos say these "fees" don't influence their prices. In effect what they are saying is "it doesn't matter how much our costs are, we charge whatever we feel customers will pay without churning too much".



Especially roaming charges check out the link.

http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/ringing-up-global-roaming-charges-3446479/video


OMG!!

That's outrageous. The excuses offered by the telcos were weak and feeble to say the least. 


Why? What is wrong with the current system? Surely it comes down to personal responbility of an end user to be aware of the costs of a product or service before they use it? All networks send you a SMS advising of pricing when your phone roams to a foreign networks and yet not a week goes by when somebody ignores this, uses their phone and then complains about the pricing.

Are you suggesting that the NZ government force companies in other countries to regulate their prices? You've got to be joking.

Global roaming prices are not high because Vodafone, Telecom or 2degrees are ripping us off. They are high because foreign networks set wholesale prices. The prices we pay for voice calling while roaming are not excessive by global standards, particularly if you're on VF's regular roaming plan which works out significantly cheaper than Telecom or Vodafone Traveller if you make national calls while roaming.

Our data pricing could be a little sharper as it's now possible to buy data roaming bundles on many networks incl Vodafone UK which work out at around NZ$2 per MB when you're roaming on other VF networks but the problem is the wholesale cost of data on many other networks is excessive (ie NZ$5 + wholesale).


I note roaming prices are regulated throughout Europe check out the link.

http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=5097




aw

19751 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1496

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 314589 4-Apr-2010 09:36 Send private message

Geektastic:
sbiddle:
Geektastic: Not really - on the face of it it does not seem to be about exactly the same aspect though:

"The Commission's investigation did not look at the prices that consumers directly pay for mobile services."  

I just never get the impression that regulation here is really aimed at telling the companies what they can charge us! 


It's not. And it would be very, very scary if the Commerce Commission was going around regulating retail prices of products. This would in effect be making price fixing legal and would be anti competitive.


And yet the European Union does that all the time.

As do Ofwat, Ofgen, Ofgas, Oftel etc in the UK.

It isn't anti competitive unless you are giving the advantage to only one person.

If you are protecting the consumer and making ALL the companies charge a reasonable rate that has been justified in written submissions, I would not consider that anti-competitive. 


The EU did not set retail rates. It set maximum wholesale rates, and maximum retail rates.

We only have one clear example of the Commerce Cmmission setting retail pricing on a telecommunications product in New Zealand, and that's the TSO which legally lets Telecom increase line rental prices yearly in line with the CPI. I'd hate that to be extended to other areas of the market!


52 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 314669 4-Apr-2010 13:38

Global roaming prices are not high because Vodafone, Telecom or 2degrees are ripping us off. They are high because foreign networks set wholesale prices.


The one (wholesale rort) does not exclude the other (retail rort).

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Trending now »

Hot discussions in our forums right now:

American legal jurisdiction in New Zealand
Created by ajobbins, last reply by ajobbins on 20-Oct-2014 22:53 (22 replies)
Pages... 2


Another Trade Me competitor: SellShed
Created by freitasm, last reply by mattwnz on 20-Oct-2014 15:16 (22 replies)
Pages... 2


Why would Suresignal calls be worse quality than non-Suresignal calls from the same location?
Created by Geektastic, last reply by gzt on 20-Oct-2014 23:43 (39 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Picture resizing on the forum
Created by Jase2985, last reply by freitasm on 18-Oct-2014 13:32 (13 replies)

Internet question...
Created by Geektastic, last reply by Geektastic on 17-Oct-2014 22:59 (40 replies)
Pages... 2 3


Why do people keep thinking National are doing a great job?
Created by sxz, last reply by Geektastic on 20-Oct-2014 23:05 (156 replies)
Pages... 9 10 11


Just bought a TiVo online. No wireless adaptor. Will a standard one work? Or do I need the TiVo one ?
Created by Limerick, last reply by graemeh on 20-Oct-2014 16:03 (11 replies)

iPad Air 2 and iPad Mini 3. Gonna get one?
Created by Dingbatt, last reply by alexx on 20-Oct-2014 13:34 (45 replies)
Pages... 2 3



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.