Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
3558 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 60

Trusted
WorldxChange

  Reply # 448980 16-Mar-2011 17:47 Send private message

It will depend on what the requirements for the code will actually be it's Lawful Intercept btw, there are TCF working parties working with the appropiate agencys now, then it will depend what companies are required to do , some may have already looked at it and already deployed technolgy to take this into account in a Next Gen world, others not, there will also be voice and data requirements and these are very different. Depending on the deployed technology and the vendors will dictate the costs of this, it will be varied depending on Vendor and requirements... it also won't be cheap Wink




Yes I am a employee of WxC (My Profile) ... but I do have my own opinions as well Wink

             

https://www.facebook.com/wxccommunications

170 posts

Master Geek


Reply # 449001 16-Mar-2011 18:46 Send private message

Cheers for the clarification and also pointing out that it is the "Lawful Intercept" and not the wire-tapping legislation. Foot in mouth

I found the comments around supplying secure VoIP communications in the original document to be quite entertaining. Roughly along the lines of "Sure, it can be supplied. Just make sure you are able to unencrypt it." 

2785 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 452

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 449033 16-Mar-2011 21:26 Send private message

Oldhat: "Sure, it can be supplied. Just make sure you are able to unencrypt it." 


Well, to be fair, that's how we do Lawful Intercept for 2G or 3G circuit-switched calls, which are also encrypted over the air... Once they get into the core they're no longer encrypted. 




iPad Air + iPhone 5S + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

1615 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 66

Trusted

  Reply # 449253 17-Mar-2011 14:46 Send private message

I think mobile networks should be required to prioritise SIP voice traffic, even if they don't "support" it.




Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

2785 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 452

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 449266 17-Mar-2011 15:26 Send private message

webwat: I think mobile networks should be required to prioritise SIP voice traffic, even if they don't "support" it.


Well, I, random user, think they should be required to prioritise SSL because I use it for my corporate VPN, and performance is critical. And also BitTorrent, because I need it for downloading Ubuntu ISOs. These things are very important to me personally, and I'm sure you can see why I'm right.

Everybody thinks their traffic is more important than everybody else's. The only fair thing we can do is treat it all the same.

As for voice calls, we already provide a well-tested method of handling those. :-)

//Me hopes webwat was not trolling; it was borderline!




iPad Air + iPhone 5S + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

3bit.com
5826 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 138

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 449367 17-Mar-2011 21:19 Send private message

webwat: I think mobile networks should be required to prioritise SIP voice traffic, even if they don't "support" it.


Why would they prioritise something that takes revenue away from them?




1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:




News »

Trending now »
Hot discussions in our forums right now:

Vodafone TV multicast settings on pfSense?
Created by kenkeniff, last reply by chrispchikin on 22-Aug-2014 22:36 (133 replies)
Pages... 7 8 9


Warning about Pure Hosting
Created by LostBoyNZ, last reply by insane on 22-Aug-2014 23:10 (31 replies)
Pages... 2 3


CGA. Is it fair?
Created by BTR, last reply by bazzer on 22-Aug-2014 11:02 (86 replies)
Pages... 4 5 6


Fluoride is safe, who knew?
Created by networkn, last reply by SaltyNZ on 22-Aug-2014 22:24 (24 replies)
Pages... 2


Free: Smart Button for your Android device
Created by freitasm, last reply by PhantomNVD on 22-Aug-2014 22:08 (104 replies)
Pages... 5 6 7


Lightbox press event release
Created by freitasm, last reply by Lightbox on 22-Aug-2014 17:04 (469 replies)
Pages... 30 31 32


The Whisky thread
Created by freitasm, last reply by freitasm on 22-Aug-2014 23:41 (19 replies)
Pages... 2


Opotiki SPCA vote
Created by JayADee, last reply by shk292 on 22-Aug-2014 20:21 (19 replies)
Pages... 2



Geekzone Live »
Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.