Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
BDFL - Memuneh
52131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6020

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 742398 9-Jan-2013 17:14 Send private message

No, it doesn't.




12 posts

Geek


  Reply # 742401 9-Jan-2013 17:18 Send private message

Ah, alright then, that would be a deal breaker for me, but again, probably not an issue for the masses, I guess the only real issue is the price point then. How'd the battery treat you?

BDFL - Memuneh
52131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6020

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 742403 9-Jan-2013 17:26 Send private message

I had to recharge it three times over two weeks. WiFi, Bluetooth and mobile data off as I didn't use those.




412 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 118


  Reply # 742455 9-Jan-2013 19:29 Send private message

Wow, Ok perhaps my expectations of a modern camera are too low. I took some 15 sec exposures of the night sky last night, they were pretty good. Managed to get quite a few nice shots over 1/30th even without a tripod. Each to their own I guess. I would rate the images overall as being as good as a canon sx40.

4501 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 432

Trusted

  Reply # 742477 9-Jan-2013 19:47 Send private message

turnin: Wow, Ok perhaps my expectations of a modern camera are too low. I took some 15 sec exposures of the night sky last night, they were pretty good. Managed to get quite a few nice shots over 1/30th even without a tripod. Each to their own I guess. I would rate the images overall as being as good as a canon sx40.


For most uses the disparity in quality won't matter, considering normal people aren't pixel peepers and the shots will look perfectly pleasing on the Galaxy screen and at the reduced sizes at which most people look at their pictures virtually all of the time. If you zoom in and really compare the images to those from a similarly or even lower-priced standalone the differences are apparent - the dynamic range isn't as good, there is more chromatic aberration, more noise, and less preserved detail. To some the overall package will still be worth it.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: AndroidNZ.net


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




Twitter »
Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.