Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




240 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 94


Topic # 213966 21-Apr-2017 10:10 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

This is kinda appalling, they got caught out by people posting their benchmark scores, and when their users looked into it further, realized the exact same model can be found with significantly different memory chips, resulting in a high-end price, with mid-range level components. 

 

It's basically lying to your customers, and now they've been called upon to explain, they've blatantly come out and said not our problem  - "we never advertised the memory type used inside the P10, so suck it."

 

This would cause me to be very wary with Huawei's products, if you're sinking $1000 of your hard earned cash on the best, you need to trust the company isn't going to short change you!

 

Android Auhority with Huawei's response.

 

PocketNow confirmed the differences could be up around 500Mbs!!

 

XDA's post on the story.


Create new topic
13449 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3122

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1768359 21-Apr-2017 10:41 Send private message quote this post

If there have been no assertions about the specification of the memory included in a specific phone, I am not sure how this is bait and switch? What is the REAL world impact across devices (not synthetic benchmarks which usually mean nothing). 

 

 


2157 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1768399 21-Apr-2017 11:38 3 people support this post Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

If there have been no assertions about the specification of the memory included in a specific phone, I am not sure how this is bait and switch? What is the REAL world impact across devices (not synthetic benchmarks which usually mean nothing). 

 

 

 

 

I also bet the "review" phones that they sent out were the ones with the better specs.  If that is the case then it really is bait and switch as if the review phones had better memory etc then that is what the review is based off.

 

 

 

Will be interesting to see what ends up happening.


13449 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3122

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1768401 21-Apr-2017 11:41 Send private message quote this post

tripp:

 

networkn:

 

If there have been no assertions about the specification of the memory included in a specific phone, I am not sure how this is bait and switch? What is the REAL world impact across devices (not synthetic benchmarks which usually mean nothing). 

 

 

 

 

I also bet the "review" phones that they sent out were the ones with the better specs.  If that is the case then it really is bait and switch as if the review phones had better memory etc then that is what the review is based off.

 

 

 

Will be interesting to see what ends up happening.

 

 

Well, you'd need evidence to support that claim.

 

 


2157 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1768406 21-Apr-2017 11:51 Send private message quote this post

i would :P


1779 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 539

Trusted

  Reply # 1768437 21-Apr-2017 13:04 Send private message quote this post

If they'd advertised the phone as having a particular feature then I agree it's bait and switch.

 

But they didn't. If you bought the phone having seen particular performance benchmarks and you got much lower ones based on the hardware you ended up with I think you'd be right to be fairly disappointed, but I don't think it's bait and switch at all.

 

I think the topic is overly alarming and incorrect IMHO.  They never offered the "bait" the OP claims.

 

My old Nexus6 had memory by Samsung in it, but there were (if I recall properly) about 2-3 other manufacturers whose chips could be in a N6.  I have always wondered if it had something to do with some people having no lag and others (like me) having consistent lag problems.  But it was just bad luck - Google/Motorola never made any promises about the flash chip maker.  Just that it had 64Gb Flash storage.




240 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 94


  Reply # 1768478 21-Apr-2017 14:04 Send private message quote this post

muppet:

 

If they'd advertised the phone as having a particular feature then I agree it's bait and switch.

 

 

 

 

Sorry, I initially read that Huawei had provided good quality phones to reviewers however this was unsubstantiated and I apologize unreservedly.

 

I've messaged the mods and asked them to correct the title or delete this thread. [Edit: this has been done!]

 

I stand by my comments this is pretty appalling, and underhanded.

 

As they're very premium phones here with prices up there with devices that carry known good quality components, if I had bought one (I was going to!) then I would be very peeved and wish I'd found out about this before buying one.

 

If you really don't care about the quality of the memory, by all means, ignore this advice. As this website is catered for the very type who do read reviews etc, I figured this was an apt place to warn people before they sink $1200 into a device as it's not clear in any way, shape or form that the device could be significantly slower than the devices specs they saw in reviews.


2157 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 420

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1768512 21-Apr-2017 15:43 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

I really don't know if it is bait and switch but they are not the same chips (or same standard/speed etc). Then they should be up front about it to the market they are selling in.  It's like how samsung uses 2 different chips for the s7 and s8, in the US and japan the s8 gets the snapdragon 835 however everywhere else gets the samsung designed chip.  The big difference here is that samsung tells you.

 

 

 

 

 

 


1793 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 397


  Reply # 1768533 21-Apr-2017 16:47 Send private message quote this post

Well here is someone who can check what specs they have in the p10 they are selling if you want to know first?
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=77&topicid=213922

520 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 50

Trusted

  Reply # 1769929 24-Apr-2017 17:49 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

Mate of mine has the P10 which he purchased locally in NZ - its got LPDDR4 and UFS 2.0 (instead of 2.1). He bought it just a few days ago so it's still brand new with hardly any apps installed. We ran three runs of AndroBench on Airplane mode and after reboots, and averaged about 550 MB/s (sequential read), so it looks like his device is using UFS 2.0.

 

If his phone had UFS 2.1, as was originally advertised by Huawei, he would have speeds around 750-800MB/s, as reported by users, Engadget and noted by Huawei themselves in their official presentation for the P10.

 

As noted by online reports and from the CEO's statement, it appears that users may get any random combination of LPDDR3/LPDDR4/eMMC/UFS 2.0/UFS 2.1  - so it's a luck of the draw, which is very disingenuous of Huawei, considering the significant differences in speeds between the storage technologies.

 

Unlucky eMMC users have reported and demonstrated speeds of around ~250-300MB/s which is a huge step-down from UFS 2.1. Luckily my mate ended up with UFS 2.0 which isn't as bad, but he still feels cheated as he paid flagship prices for this phone (~ $1000 NZD) and will be getting his phone refunded.


12214 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1879

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1770017 24-Apr-2017 21:13 One person supports this post Send private message quote this post

How much real world difference does it make?





Amazon Certified Solution Architect, Sysop Administrator, and Developer (all associate)
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


Create new topic








Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:






Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.