Microsoft being a Onecare
All right, I know it's good to that Microsoft provides a free malware scanning utility and that I'm being a bit of a duck to have a go at them, but nevertheless, the Windows Live OneCare Safety Scanner is a bad idea that should be taken down fast.
For starters, it uses an ActiveX control - Internet Explorer required in other words - that's annoyingly hard to install. You get warnings galore from Windows 7's UAC and IE about popups and do you really really really want to install something that has the potential to roger your system well and truly?
That's not what a non-technical user wants to see, especially if s/he thinks the computer in question has been compromised via the Internet.
Does it work then? No idea yet, because this is far as I got:
Ah yes, good old error number 0x0C600C03. Of course. Tells you exactly what went wrong, doesn't it?
And why is this done over HTTP and not secured HTTPS anyway?
See that little "Love it? Tell your friends" exhortation to email your friends about the scanner? Yep, very bad idea that too, as from now on, malware writers will start spamming about OneCare safety scanner, with the payload likely to be something you really don't want on your computer.
Other related posts:
Pacific Fibre cable a bold initiative that the government should support
Trade Me, the behemoth on NZ's Internet
Twitter.com DNS hijacked?
Comment by steve, on 13-NOV-2009 15:35
You have to seriously wonder about the depth of thought they gave to this.....especially the "email all your friends" thing.....
That would be enough to shake one's faith in this tool right there.
Comment by Ragnor, on 13-NOV-2009 16:17
OneCare was pretty sub par, I'm surprised anyone is using it still since it's practically abandoned.
Microsoft Security Essentials superseded it and it's a much improved offering.
Comment by Dave, on 16-NOV-2009 12:54
0x0C600C03=disable your installed AV while running ANY online AV scanner.
Comment by Marius, on 17-NOV-2009 01:29
It's amazing how an article like this could have been posted on Geekzone. Onecase is way out-of-date and Security Essentials is there to replace it. SE ranks very well even when compared with paid-for products (norton and alike).
Comment by Sean, on 10-DEC-2009 21:14
As a fulltime computer geek, I cringe whenever I see a copy of OneCare installed on somebody's computer. They are few and far between though I must admint...
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments.
If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and shown in this blog post.
Links to stories I've written:
Google News search for me
PC World New Zealand
Computerworld NZ
PC World and Computerworld Australia
PC World US
Computerworld US
Infoworld
NZ Herald
Virus Bulletin
PC World NZ Blog
All comments posted on this blog are the copyright and responsibility of the submitters in question. Comments commercial and promotional in nature are not allowed. Please ensure that your comments are on topic and refrain from making personal remarks.
Comment by Bill Bennett, on 13-NOV-2009 15:31
You've got to ask yourself "why bother" with the safety scanner when there's Security Essentials and Defender?