Here's a site that expresses what I've never really articulated:
BSD is what you get when a bunch of Unix hackers sit down to try to port a Unix system to the PC. Linux is what you get when a bunch of PC hackers sit down and try to write a Unix system for the PC.
When I bought my last car, a Japanese import, and thus unregistered in NZ at that point, I vaguely pondered getting some snazzy personlised number plate. I didn't need to. They gave me this:
Other related posts:
rsync and Time Machine instead of svn for small project
Google Desktop for Mac breaks mdimport/Spotlight
Comment by scruss, on 22-Jun-2007 14:41
When I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on my basement server, it felt like installing Linux circa 1996. It asked me things about hardware and partitioning that I didn't need to know. Configuring apache was so much grief that I never completed it, so the machine languished.
A couple of months back I installed Ubuntu LTS on the same machine. It does what I need, and no C-shell either.
Hi Stewart -- yes, Ubuntu rocks. I've recently installed it and I am very impressed. But I still feel more at home in the BSD command line on my Mac and the VoIP servers I deal with. The BSD package management system rocks.
I guess it all comes down to personal preference and what you're doing.
Comment by juha, on 22-Jun-2007 15:09
FreeBSD and OpenBSD user myself.
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and shown in this blog post.