Today Stuff features with a story entitled "111 failure: Police weren't sent to knife-point robbery"
Maybe somebody would like to tell me where the 111 service actually failed? The 111 service worked perfectly, the 111 call was answered by Telecom and then transferred through to the Northcom which is a joint Police/NZFS Communications Centre in Auckland.
These communications centres are not the 111 service.
No failure occured with the 111 service and in this situation the 111 service performed exactly as it's supposed to.
The headline should have read "Police Communications Centre Failure - Police weren't sent to knife-point robbery"
How many times do the media need to have this explained to them before they're capable of grasping such a simple concept? It's an error that they've made numerous times in the past and still continue to make.
Other related posts:
Fairfax takes journalism ethics and integrity to a whole new low with Stuff fibre
Why are airport taxes and service charges so high on Trans Tasman flights between New Zealand and Australia?
Flight reviews – Air New Zealand NZ87 Auckland (AKL) to Hong Kong (HKG) in Premium Economy and Air New Zealand NZ 80 Hong Kong (HKG) to Auckland (AKL) in Business Premier on the 777-200ER
Comment by weblordpepe, on 27-Feb-2008 03:27
Once again, someone who did no wrong will suffer, and widespread misinformation & ignorance ensues. Who do they have typing those articles anyway? There's so many damn typing errors.
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Are you a registered Geekzone user? Login to have the fields below automatically filled in for you and to enable links in comments. If you have (or qualify to have) a Geekzone Blog then your comment will be automatically confirmed and shown in this blog post.