Helen Clark has shunned the idea of a common currency but has suggest a compromise - a single trans-tasman telephone calling rate.
Miss Clark instead suggested closer collaboration in telecommunications markets. The key to both countries' prosperity was joining forces in areas of complementary strengths.
"My dream would be to see two trans-Tasman telecommunications markets offering one domestic rate of calling. That would be fantastic for families, business, travellers, the lot."
Yet more proof of how out of touch our Prime Minister really is.
Toll plans are already available from virtually all telecommunications providers offering bundled calling rates to NZ and Australia. Telecom's package is probably the most popular delivering residential users 6000 minutes per month to NZ or Australia for $25 per month. VoIP has also delivered more than that - it's now enabling businesses to use VoIP providers in both NZ and Australia to avoid the costs incurred using traditional PSTN solutions and deliver far greater flexibility. A business can now have both NZ and Australian telephone numbers and pay less per month that what Telecom NZ will charge you for a standard business PSTN phone line.
It's obviously she opened her mouth (yet again) without bothering to check her facts first..
Thank's to CafeNet and my VoIP enabled Nokia E65 my day was saved. I could connect to the CafeNet access point across the road at Greytown Computers and be connected with my Asterisk PBX here at home and was free to make calls - and avoid paying Vodafone! :-)
The Intel D201GLY packs a integrated Celeron processor onto a Mini ITX board and is as cheap as chips - I was quoted a price today of just on $150 + GST for the system with 512MB RAM. Via have essentially had the mini ITX market to themselves for a long time and have traditionally had lower powered processors on their boards. Something like this Intel board would be fantatic for anybody who wants to play with embedded systems or even put a cool CarPC in your boot!
Has anybody also noticed how the AA always used to criticise fuel price increases until BP started being the main culprit? It's obviously pure coincidence that around the same time as this BP hopped into bed with the AA. In the old days George Fairbain from the AA would be out accusing the fuel companies of ripping off customers. Now that it's their partner you hear very little..
I'm reckon everybody should boycott BP, it least it would send Peter Griffiths a blunt message that consumers don't want to be ripped off...Looking at it from another perspective however maybe the fact that so many dumb consumers are happy to pay 8c per litlre more for fuel is all the proof they need that there is nothing wrong with their current strategy?
In what is a repeat of the past 3 weekends of cheap fuel BP have been the first major chain to raise prices, this time by 8c per litre raising the price of petrol to 159.9 for a litre of 91 unleaded.
My pick is that by tomorrow morning BP will be forced to back down from this increase because nobody else will follow with an 8c price increase and I'll pick fuel prices dropping back to 157.9.
You're pathetic BP. You spend money advertising "cheap fuel weekends" and then rip Kiwi motorists off by being the first to raise prices to a point more than they were before the weekend started, and for the 3rd weekend in a row you're going to get pwned big time when nobody else follows suit.
And to all the mororists out there who support BP - how about spending your money elsewhere rather than supporting a company who's only interested in ripping every hard earned cent they can from you?
Following on from yesterday's post (BP raises fuel prices. Unsuspecting Kiwi customers ripped off) it's obvious today that BP's attempt to raise petrol prices forced them to back down yet again. Both Shell and Caltex raised prices to 157.9 this morning. Mobil only increased their price to 156.9 forcing BP to cut 4c per litre off their price and all other's to drop 1c and match the Mobil price.
It's interesting to read BP trying to get bragging rights about reducing petrol by 5c for the second weekend in a row. Maybe Peter Griffiths would like to explain why BP feel it necessary on both Monday mornings to increase petrol back to a point higher than the previous Friday? Your customers know you're scamming them.
Fuel prices dropped by 5c per litre of Friday from 157.9 for a litre of 91 to 152.9 over the weekend.
A completely unscientific survey on my way home today (driving past 9 petrol stations) indicates that while BP have raised their price to 160.9 all other companies have remained at 152.9
Don't support these idiots. I wouldn't even buy a packet of chewing gum from them. They're the PPI (petrol price increase) leaders in the New Zealand marketplace.
UPDATE @ 22:00 Shell have moved their price to 157.9 which is the same as it was on Friday. My money is on BP dropping their price in the morning to match that and pretending this never happened. The problem is customers are a lot smarter than you think.
Full details http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411749/1121229
TelstraClear have just launched a new Business product into the marketplace called BizLine which gives you the option of "flat rate" calling available on two of their plans.
These rates represent significant discounts over what many small to medium sized business users may already be paying. Why however should business users be paying such a huge premium compared to residential users?
Slingshot offers residential line rental for $42.95 per month and a $19.95 monthly charge on top of that gives you unlimited calling anywhere in New Zealand or Australia.
Telecom offers residential line rental for $43.60 per month and a $25 monthly charge gives you Talk It Up Downunder which gives 6000 minutes per month to New Zealand or Australia.
ihug offers residential line rental for $41.00 per month and a $20 monthly charge gives you talk2 which offers unlimited calling anywhere in NZ or you can pay an extra $5 ($25 total) for talk2-nz+aus which gives unlimited calling to New Zealand or Australia.
It's obvious if you're a residential customer you're getting all the deals while anybody running a business (including those with a home business) are being ripped off for receiving exactly the same service.
Should business users be paying similair rates to home users for receiving exactly the same service? Why are business users not complaing about the high rates they are paying? Are business people making so much money they simply don't care about being ripped off? Why are TUANZ not raising this issue? Ernie Newman seems to love being in the media splotlight, I'm sure he could get some distance with this.
The move towards VoIP is going to seriously hurt telco's who being that price gouging is a perfectly acceptible business practice. Gone will be the days of paying inflated prices for line rental and calling. That can only be good for the economy.
h8x0rs and the Advanced Access Content System Licensing Administrator.
Several weeks ago it was announced that licence keys for several products were being revocated as both WinDVD and PowerDVD has been cracked to originally break the AACS copy protection. Revoking these licences and forcing people to upgrade their software should have fixed the problem...
But the h8x0rs are smarter than that. The latest news on the Doom Forums details a firmware hack to the Microsoft external HD-DVD player which involved removing the drive's firmware chip, reading the contents and then soldering it back into the drive. It's something your average DIY consumer won't be doing but it's yet another serious setback for AACS and DRM as a whole.