A kick in the teeth for Saturn, a win for Telecom, and too bad for all those Aucklanders who were'nt quite so precious about the view from their bedroom.
Mind you, back in 2001 (when this decision was made) broadband barely existed, so most people wouldn't have known what they were missing out on.
Roll on 2006, and the great broadband debacle of NZ - also known as Full Speed, Unleashed or whatever else is next - and I wonder if Auckland residents are ready to revisit the choice of 5 years ago.After all, if the government can look at their 2003 decision to not unbundle, then change their mind, why not the Auckland councils?
Of course, this is the consultative age now, where every man and his dog can object to anybody doing anything (goodness only knows what will happen here if the equivalent of the British ASBO - Anti-Social Behavioural Order - is introduced), so it will take people power to get anything done.
Auckland is a tough market. A lot of the territory is volcanic, which makes it expensive to dig and hide wiring. It's also dense, meaning lots of people in a small area all wanting good service (which is a contributing factor to why DSL is so slow compared to rest of country).
So revisit the choice. With the benefit of hindsight. In light of new information. Having considered the alternatives. And it doesn't have to be TelstraClear (which now owns Saturn) - what about VodaHug, Callplus, Vector or anyone else?
If Auckland residents want decent broadband, then approach your telco, approach your council, organise and let your thoughts be known!
- November 2006
Other related posts:
The secret life of mobile batteries - UPDATED 6.10.2016
What do you do if you're in the CBD in an Earthquake?
Org charts… Silicon Valley style