Today the Commerce Commission released its draft decision about the 2013/14 Telecommunications Development Levy. Between them New Zealand’s top 22 telcos will have to stump up $50 million to subsidise rural services.
The government calls it a levy; it is really a tax on telecommunications investors. Telcos each have to pay around 1.2 percent of revenue.
By co-incidence the Commerce Commission announced its draft decision just hours after Air New Zealand said it would scrap regional flights and drop services entirely to three small towns.
Nothing could be clearer. There is one rule for telecommunications investors and another rule for Air New Zealand investors. One group has to subside rural New Zealand, the other group has no obligation. In contrast Air New Zealand gets official praise for ditching rural routes.
In the latest Air New Zealand Annual Report the airline says it had revenues of $4.2 billion. The Air New Zealand group made revenues of $4.6 billion. Either way the two figures are close enough.
Different, not that different
Air New Zealand and the telcos have different business models. They report figures in different ways. We’re not comparing apples with apples. Yet the numbers are not totally out of sync. Air New Zealand Group had Earnings Before Finance Costs, Depreciation, Amortisation, Rental Expenses and Taxation of just over $1 billion. Spark reported an EBITDA of $936 million. Some of the 22 telcos paying the TDL are under water or, at best, borderline profitable. Telecommunications investors have every right to be grumpy.
Things are worse for Chorus investors. They’ve been hit with a double whammy. The network provider’s share of the TDL is $11.5 million. That’s on top of the price cuts for copper services imposed the Commerce Commission.
Unlike the retail telcos, Chorus is a wholesale operation. It has little or no scope to pass the cost of its TDL obligation on to customers. It is debatable whether Chorus should pay the levy.
The levy is a simple cash grab by the government taking the funds directly from Chorus investors. Incidentally, there was no discussion of whether Chorus would be liable for the TDL when the business demerged from Telecom NZ. At the time the plan was to end the TDL.
Chorus treated poorly
Chorus investors thought they were buying a utility — that’s a type of investment with predictable capital requirements and revenue flows — they were hit with regulated price cuts. To be fair, investors knew that was coming, they just didn’t expect the regulator to cut as deep.
This isn’t an argument against the TDL. If there are good economic, practical or political reasons for the rest of New Zealand to subsidise rural telecommunications, we should come clean and do it through the tax system, not through a back door tax punishing a single industry.
Whatever logic applies to giving rural New Zealand a communications lifeline must apply equally to giving the same sector a transport lifeline. If the government can tax telcos $50 million to get broadband out to the wop wops, why not tax Air New Zealand $12 million to fly planes to rural centres?
One last thought on this. With the exception of MyRepublic, which has some local investment, there hasn’t been a rush from overseas companies to cash in on New Zealand’s brave new fibre network. Anyone wondering why there is such a lack of interest need look no further than the uneven treatment the telecommunications sector gets from government.