Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
1569 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 480

Subscriber

  Reply # 382705 21-Sep-2010 14:50
Send private message

bazzer:
Handle9:
bazzer:
Handle9: Personally I'd put the sweet spot at around 4 years.

Based on what?  As I pointed out earlier in the thread, financially you're better off after 3 years (assuming 6% interest).  Under the same assumption, 4 years of $15 works out to about $640 in today's money (compared to an extra $500 cost for the "buy" option).

You'd need to be making 20% interest on your money for the sweet spot to be around 4 years.  Actually, maybe that isn't so far fetched if you also have credit card debt you could clear instead.


Based on that you could loose your job, crash your car etc etc etc and have to give up Sky which could mean that your $699 is a sunk cost, which you get no benefit out of.

Time value of money calculations are all very well but they don't take into account possible change of circumstances.

To me flexibility is worth an extra couple of hundred dollars over 4 years. Obviously if you're in a very stable situation where you're sure you won't be giving up Sky then it's a different story. For us mere mortgage slaves however...

I just didn't know where you got the 4 years from?  Your idea is perfectly fine, sure you may lseo your job etc.  Why would the sweet spot be 4 years?  That doesn't make any sense.



If I was pretty sure I was going to keep sky for more than 4 years continuously then I'd pay the up front cost. 4 years is approx 3 years payback + 1 year safety factor to allow for risk. If you have a higher threshold for risk then you may want to allow less than that.

If I thought that there was a possibility that my circumstances change over that period would change then I'd rent. 

It makes sense to me. It may not make sense to you but I can't really help that.

1069 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 99

Trusted

  Reply # 382729 21-Sep-2010 15:28
Send private message

Handle9:


If I was pretty sure I was going to keep sky for more than 4 years continuously then I'd pay the up front cost. 4 years is approx 3 years payback + 1 year safety factor to allow for risk. If you have a higher threshold for risk then you may want to allow less than that.

If I thought that there was a possibility that my circumstances change over that period would change then I'd rent. 

It makes sense to me. It may not make sense to you but I can't really help that.


You'd only have to be sure you're keeping it for the break-even timeframe (i.e. just over three years). Even if you lose your job at exactly the break-even point and have to give it up, you've not paid a single cent more at that stage than you would have done if you'd chosen the rent option. You don't need a 1-year "safety factor" for it to make financial sense to pay the one-off fee.

 
 
 
 


1163 posts

Uber Geek


  Reply # 382738 21-Sep-2010 15:44

Sky needs some competition. Wish the gov unbundled them too. I can't think of any other company where you buy the PVR for $500, but you never actually own it.

1569 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 480

Subscriber

  Reply # 382749 21-Sep-2010 16:05
Send private message

steve98:
Handle9:


If I was pretty sure I was going to keep sky for more than 4 years continuously then I'd pay the up front cost. 4 years is approx 3 years payback + 1 year safety factor to allow for risk. If you have a higher threshold for risk then you may want to allow less than that.

If I thought that there was a possibility that my circumstances change over that period would change then I'd rent. 

It makes sense to me. It may not make sense to you but I can't really help that.


You'd only have to be sure you're keeping it for the break-even timeframe (i.e. just over three years). Even if you lose your job at exactly the break-even point and have to give it up, you've not paid a single cent more at that stage than you would have done if you'd chosen the rent option. You don't need a 1-year "safety factor" for it to make financial sense to pay the one-off fee.


And if you lose your job/health next month and have to give up Sky then you lose in a big way. As I said if you value risk in a different way then you could allow for less. This is what made sense to me when I got MySky a couple of years ago.

My circumstances did change (we bought a bigger house with a much bigger mortgage) and I got rid of Sky. Worked for me. It all comes down to how you choose to price risk/flexibilty.

1163 posts

Uber Geek


  Reply # 382754 21-Sep-2010 16:12

Handle9:
steve98:
Handle9:


If I was pretty sure I was going to keep sky for more than 4 years continuously then I'd pay the up front cost. 4 years is approx 3 years payback + 1 year safety factor to allow for risk. If you have a higher threshold for risk then you may want to allow less than that.

If I thought that there was a possibility that my circumstances change over that period would change then I'd rent. 

It makes sense to me. It may not make sense to you but I can't really help that.


You'd only have to be sure you're keeping it for the break-even timeframe (i.e. just over three years). Even if you lose your job at exactly the break-even point and have to give it up, you've not paid a single cent more at that stage than you would have done if you'd chosen the rent option. You don't need a 1-year "safety factor" for it to make financial sense to pay the one-off fee.


And if you lose your job/health next month and have to give up Sky then you lose in a big way. As I said if you value risk in a different way then you could allow for less. This is what made sense to me when I got MySky a couple of years ago.


My circumstances did change (we bought a bigger house with a much bigger mortgage) and I got rid of Sky. Worked for me. It all comes down to how you choose to price risk/flexibilty.


 

I've got freeview, and find that there is more than enough on there. The only things that I would miss are the live sports, but you have to be on a premium plan to get those channels anyway. Just go around to the mates or a pub to watch those if the need arises. Sky is definately something that can be lived without. Especially as you can now buy a freeview Tivo for just $360.

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.