Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
3107 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 396


  Reply # 2015934 14-May-2018 16:45
Send private message

Woah. So it's not 'debt collection', it's passed up the level from that 1 further to the user not adhering to the contract terms in which it was obtained?

 

Clever if not awkward to take so long to block if the SIM was never associated or tied.

 

Whos signed up recently that has one (contract) on hand to see if it mentions IEMI/SN/Device specifics. I'd have thought as long as the party kept paying the bill the device was just a cheap payment plan perk for the term to have your custom - usually works out over the 'buy out' (unless on special) price and says you have to pay the rest if you break out.

 

Full phone cost (including discount) must be repaid if you exit, transfer or downtrade your plan before 24 months.

 

Q. What happens if I want end my contract early?
A. If you exit or transfer to another provider before the end of the interest free term you just need to pay the remaining balance of the device cost and any early termination fees for your mobile plan.

 

So whos policing the exit or non use of the device if they are tied.. Sounds like there is a lot of faith on the punters to not try and make a buck while getting a good plan.


3604 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1540

Subscriber

  Reply # 2024355 29-May-2018 00:30
Send private message

I would be demanding to know why the phone wasn't SIM locked to the original customers SIM. If there is a requirement that the customer must use the phone.

As presumably if someone buys a phone on contract, and just leaves it in the box at home. It will also get blacklisted.

This saga still smells like the telcos operating on the edge of the law. As assuming that the original customer keeps on paying the bills and remains on the contract. The Telco won't actually loose any money.

What if I get a phone on such a contract, and use a SIM card from another provider in it? If I intended to do so from the beginning, is that obtaining by deception? Or is it a breach of contract? (Assuming I retain possession of the phone).


I don't see how this scenario is any different to say buying a washing machine from Harvey Norman on finance. And then giving or selling that washing machine to my mum.

Have the Police stated that they are going to file charges for obtaining by deception against someone?





 
 
 
 


3604 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1540

Subscriber

  Reply # 2024359 29-May-2018 02:02
Send private message

Did the Telco or the TCF state wether the person who obtained the phone, was a bona fide customer. Or did they use a false identity to obtain the phone? If the original customer was bona fide, then the phone wasn't obtained fraudulently. The question comes back to wether there is a security interest in the phone. Ask to be shown a PPSR record. And if not, then the "obtaining by deception" is simply a red herring. And the dispute is simply a contract dispute.

It could also be argued that blocking the IMEI of the phone is equivalent to repoessing a car. As in both cases, the item can't be used for its intended purpose. Which would then mean, did the Telco comply with the rules around repossessions? And then the original contract could also be constructed as a secured contract. Which then opens up the possibility that the contract with the original customer is actually a hire purchase or loan contract. Yet more rules around consumer lending would need to be complied with. And the Telco would also need to register as a financial service's provider.

I wouldn't trust someone reading from a script at a telcos call center to telling you the definitive truth. Just look at what is happening right now to the banks in regards to them providing financial advice and selling investments.





27673 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7156

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2024380 29-May-2018 07:13
3 people support this post
Send private message

The whole blocking issue is an interesting one, and after my blog post about it and subsequent discussions with both Spark and 2d I'm even more convinced the practices used primarily by Spark are nothing but dodgy.

 

They are determining a bad debt situation to be "fraud" and using the phone as security despite not wanting to lodge it as an interest against the PPPR. This is wrong.

 

Quite simply buying *any* second hand phone carries a level of risk as there is simply no way you can ever determine if it is effectively has a (illegal, since it's not registered against the PPSR) security interest against it by Spark. Spark will not disclose anything about a handset to anybody but the account holder so you're basically stuck with no way to ensure that any phone you buy will not be blocked months after.

 

Imagine buying a car, checking it against the PPSR to find it has no security and then months later somebody could impound it. There would be outrage.  

 

The TCF should be fronting on this issue but basically seem completely disinterested in what is happening. Until Spark start following proper process and adding handsets to the PPSR and the TCF start cross referencing the PPSR with their website checker I don't recommend anybody buys a second hand phone unless it's from somebody they know and trust. The risks are simply too great.

 

 

 

 


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Orcon announces new always-on internet service for Small Business
Posted 18-Apr-2019 10:19


Spark Sport prices for Rugby World Cup 2019 announced
Posted 16-Apr-2019 07:58


2degrees launches new unlimited mobile plan
Posted 15-Apr-2019 09:35


Redgate brings together major industry speakers for SQL in the City Summits
Posted 13-Apr-2019 12:35


Exported honey authenticated on Blockchain
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:19


HPE and Nutanix partner to deliver hybrid cloud as a service
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:12


Southern Cross and ASN sign contract for Southern Cross NEXT
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:09


Data security top New Zealand consumer priority when choosing a bank
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:07


Samsung announces first 8K screens to hit New Zealand
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:03


New cyber-protection and insurance product for businesses launched in APAC
Posted 10-Apr-2019 20:59


Kiwis ensure streaming is never interrupted by opting for uncapped broadband plans
Posted 7-Apr-2019 09:05


DHL Express introduces new MyDHL+ online portal to make shipping easier
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:51


RackWare hybrid cloud platform removes barriers to enterprise cloud adoption
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:50


Top partner named at MYOB High Achievers Awards
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:48


Great ideas start in Gisborne with hackathon event back for another round
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:42



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.