I'm thinking maybe around 16-20 Mbs.
I know I'm not getting HD and all that, just trying to convert my tapes to a watchable format and as blu-rays fit more than DVD I'm using them.
![]() ![]() |
stevenz: If the source material is interlaced, you'll need to de-interlace it while you're at it.+1 make sure you do a small sample file first to check before you commit.....
stevenz: Given that a BluRay will fit around 25GB per-layer, you can probably set the bitrate as high as you like and not worry about it. Given that the source material isn't HD, then 5Kbps would be more than adequate. DVD quality rarely exceeds 8Mbps but that's using inferior compression. >10Mbps is more than enough for excellent quality 720p video.
Just try a few sample encodes and see what the output looks like. If the source material is interlaced, you'll need to de-interlace it while you're at it.
Chainsaw: The source is definitely interlaced - why de-interlace?
Chainsaw: I'm not that happy with 5Kbps DVDs, not bad, but not great, there's a definite quality loss from the source.
stevenz:Ah yeah, sorry, I thought you meant 5Kbs Mpeg-2. Indeed from what I've read AVC is twice the quality, or half the bitrate. So you reckon 5Mbps is about the tipping point then? Wow, I'd probably be able to fit 4 tapes on one 25GB disc then!
DVDs @ 5Mbps look decidedly average as they use antiquated MPEG2 compression. AVC/h.264 gives somewhere in the region of twice the perceivable visual quality at the same bitrate. I'd be surprised if you could notice much difference between 5Mbps h.264 & MiniDV source material unless you were looking for it very closely.
Jaxson: It depends on what format you opt for and how the player sees the file. If it sees it as not requiring de interlacing then it wont touch it, it may just think you intended it to be that way.Sorry, don't quite follow that.
Chainsaw: Went into Dick Smith to buy a disc or two - they don't have ANY blu-ray discs! Ayiyi.
Will try other places tonight.
![]() ![]() |