Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 


17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210872 4-Apr-2019 18:52
Send private message

Dairyxox: The way I see it, the golden age of TV content has passed. Doesn't mean a new golden age wont happen. Eventually the successful 'big fish' will purchase and swallow the minnows, and we'll be back to a few services with all the content.

 

Monopolies?




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210875 4-Apr-2019 18:59
Send private message

Handle9:
tdgeek: Right now, the distributors are distributors, Netflix, Lightbox, etc. The only producer I am aware of that is distributing tbeir own content is Disney and that's yet to start. That may well be a cheaper option for consumers as it removes the middleman and we buy direct from the manufacturer, to coin a retail analogy. The same has been voiced in sports, maybe the sports owners provide their wares direct to the public.

 

 

 



Nope. Netflix and Amazon are both producing a ton of content. The back catalogue is incredibly valuable to them and vertically integrated content has been a clear strategy for a number of years.

 

Are you sure they are producing and not buying? 


 
 
 
 




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210876 4-Apr-2019 19:01
Send private message

Handle9:

 

Netflix have got production facilities at their new headquarters and have bought ABQ Studios in Albuquerque. 

 

For the purposes of this thread commissioning and in house production is effectively the same. Netflix have exclusive rights to the IP, which they paid to develop, and don't rely on licensing it from external content providers. They aren't buying finished content, they are signing development deals with content creators (eg Shonda Rhimes).

 

The point is that their IP isn't (generally) available on other platforms (there are some exceptions) and they can control it. Amazon, Disney and Netflix all have exclusive content that the other platforms can not access.

 

 

So they OWN the production, the actors/actresses, studios, infrastructure, everything, just as a movie production?  


2304 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 2210923 4-Apr-2019 20:41
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Handle9:

 

Netflix have got production facilities at their new headquarters and have bought ABQ Studios in Albuquerque. 

 

For the purposes of this thread commissioning and in house production is effectively the same. Netflix have exclusive rights to the IP, which they paid to develop, and don't rely on licensing it from external content providers. They aren't buying finished content, they are signing development deals with content creators (eg Shonda Rhimes).

 

The point is that their IP isn't (generally) available on other platforms (there are some exceptions) and they can control it. Amazon, Disney and Netflix all have exclusive content that the other platforms can not access.

 

 

So they OWN the production, the actors/actresses, studios, infrastructure, everything, just as a movie production?  

 

 

Most movies are produced by a production company but a studio agrees to finance it in exchange for distribution it. In this case Netflix is playing the part of the studio. In exchange they own the IP rights to the production.

 

The whole point is to make their service sticky. If you want to stream the Crown you can either pirate it or watch on Netflix. There are no other options




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210930 4-Apr-2019 20:47
Send private message

Handle9:

 

tdgeek:

 

Handle9:

 

Netflix have got production facilities at their new headquarters and have bought ABQ Studios in Albuquerque. 

 

For the purposes of this thread commissioning and in house production is effectively the same. Netflix have exclusive rights to the IP, which they paid to develop, and don't rely on licensing it from external content providers. They aren't buying finished content, they are signing development deals with content creators (eg Shonda Rhimes).

 

The point is that their IP isn't (generally) available on other platforms (there are some exceptions) and they can control it. Amazon, Disney and Netflix all have exclusive content that the other platforms can not access.

 

 

So they OWN the production, the actors/actresses, studios, infrastructure, everything, just as a movie production?  

 

 

Most movies are produced by a production company but a studio agrees to finance it in exchange for distribution it. In this case Netflix is playing the part of the studio. In exchange they own the IP rights to the production.

 

The whole point is to make their service sticky. If you want to stream the Crown you can either pirate it or watch on Netflix. There are no other options

 

 

Ok, I guess the issue is the level of production. MGM produces, others can buy rights. IMO there is quite a gulf between a producer and a rights buyer. If a company underwrites a series, thats not really being a producer, its being a financier for the producer. if a company wants to be a 100% true producer thats a huge investment in infrastructure.


2304 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 2210941 4-Apr-2019 21:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

For the purposes of discussing fragmentation what is the difference? It's exclusive content that other platforms can not access.

Fat bottom Trump
10373 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 2210947 4-Apr-2019 21:07
Send private message

There seems to be an assumption that original content will forever be clung to. That isn't always the case. I have seen Amazon's Grand Tour on Australian FTA.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


 
 
 
 




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210953 4-Apr-2019 21:18
Send private message

Handle9: For the purposes of discussing fragmentation what is the difference? It's exclusive content that other platforms can not access.

 

In terms of exclusive, it makes no difference. Sky gets bashed frequently for that, but its normal. But if Netflix, or for that matter any SVOD provider who became a true producer such as MGM etc, thats a huge deal. Some one mentioned that its all becoming a vertical business as owners of the content, distribute it, but apart from a near future Disney thats not the case. 

 

When we have s many SVOD players competing, there is only so much money consumers can pay. Perhaps MGM et al might bypass that model and sell direct one day. Im the meantime I may only be able to afford two providers so I dont contribute to all the top of the tree producers




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2210961 4-Apr-2019 21:20
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

There seems to be an assumption that original content will forever be clung to. That isn't always the case. I have seen Amazon's Grand Tour on Australian FTA.

 

 

 

 

You are right. Todays super cool original content (you can only see here, pay me $x) will age and become cheaper. 


2304 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 2211043 5-Apr-2019 00:32
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Handle9: For the purposes of discussing fragmentation what is the difference? It's exclusive content that other platforms can not access.

 

In terms of exclusive, it makes no difference. Sky gets bashed frequently for that, but its normal. But if Netflix, or for that matter any SVOD provider who became a true producer such as MGM etc, thats a huge deal. Some one mentioned that its all becoming a vertical business as owners of the content, distribute it, but apart from a near future Disney thats not the case. 

 

When we have s many SVOD players competing, there is only so much money consumers can pay. Perhaps MGM et al might bypass that model and sell direct one day. Im the meantime I may only be able to afford two providers so I dont contribute to all the top of the tree producers

 

 

The point is that MGM, Fox et al are being bypassed by Netflix, Amazon and Disney.

 

Movies like Roma don't go through a traditional studio, Netflix acts as the studio and engages an independent production company or produces it themselves. Similarly in the TV space they are contracting creatives directly to produce content exclusively for Netflix.

 

They are expected to spend USD$15 billion this year on commissioning/producing content. These are movies that (mostly) won't be on a movie screen and TV Shows that (mostly) won't be on any other TV platform.

 

This is very different from a traditional distribution model where MGM sells a movie once they have commissioned it.




17327 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 2211063 5-Apr-2019 07:25
Send private message

It will be interesting to see how that goes. What strikes me is that some actors may find themselves limited to the platform, Netflix or Apple, who bypass the MGM's, as the MGM's wont want to hire them as they are front and centre in the declining theatre industry. More so, will the Netflix's just get production houses that are not MGM's to just pump out content after content after content, where quantity matters more? The MGM's may decide to not sell at all to SVOD and market their own. I read Netflix will lose all Disney content. All this if it comes to pass will guarantee that consumers must subscribe to many of them, and we go full circle from Sky is too expensive we want competition, to I cant afford all this SVOD, but I will miss out on so much if I dont, and its too expensive

 

The one variable that doesn't change much is total consumer revenue. That will have to be spread over more and more content providers, who may also find themselves pumping out more and more content just to stay relevant, and that all costs, but may not be offset by growing subscriber revenues


Fat bottom Trump
10373 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 2211110 5-Apr-2019 09:05
One person supports this post
Send private message

There is still this assumption that people will die if they can't watch every single latest and greatest hot hit TV series. If the content gets fragmented, viewers will pick and choose. Nothing new there.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


515 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2211114 5-Apr-2019 09:14
One person supports this post
Send private message

What I find funny is that we have essentially got what we asked for in a round about way. 10yrs ago we were begging SKY to let us pay for only the content that we wanted rather than bundling it. We can do that now and we're still complaining because its fragmented across many different service providers. I know I'm paying far less today than I was even 2 yrs ago with no loss in quality or quantity of content that I really want to watch. 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Disney+ streaming service confirmed launch in New Zealand
Posted 20-Aug-2019 09:29


Industry plan could create a billion dollar interactive games sector
Posted 19-Aug-2019 20:41


Personal cyber insurance a New Zealand first
Posted 19-Aug-2019 20:26


University of Waikato launches space for esports
Posted 19-Aug-2019 20:20


D-Link ANZ expands mydlink ecosystem with new mydlink Mini Wi-Fi Smart Plug
Posted 19-Aug-2019 20:14


Kiwi workers still falling victim to old cyber tricks
Posted 12-Aug-2019 20:47


Lightning Lab GovTech launches 2019 programme
Posted 12-Aug-2019 20:41


Epson launches portable laser projector
Posted 12-Aug-2019 20:27


Huawei launches new distributed HarmonyOS
Posted 12-Aug-2019 20:20


Lenovo introduces single-socket servers for edge and data-intensive workloads
Posted 9-Aug-2019 21:26


The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 6.3
Posted 9-Aug-2019 16:57


Symantec sell enterprise security assets for US$ 10.7 billion to Broadcom
Posted 9-Aug-2019 16:43


Artificial tongue can distinguish whisky and identify counterfeits
Posted 8-Aug-2019 20:20


Toyota and Preferred Networks to develop service robots
Posted 8-Aug-2019 20:11


Vodafone introduces new Vodafone TV device
Posted 7-Aug-2019 17:16



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.