Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
Linux Systems Admin
1051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions
Subscriber

  Reply # 2068736 6-Aug-2018 15:30
Send private message

I had a chat today with someone who works at an insurance company. My best summary would be - watch this space.





Integrity Tech Solutions @ Norsewood, New Zealand


21999 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4652

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2068843 6-Aug-2018 16:02
Send private message

Glad to see something sensible from the judge on this one.





Richard rich.ms

 
 
 
 


Linux Systems Admin
1051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions
Subscriber

  Reply # 2068850 6-Aug-2018 16:14
One person supports this post
Send private message

richms:

 

Glad to see something sensible from the judge on this one.

 

 

Will you still feel the same way at renewal time?





Integrity Tech Solutions @ Norsewood, New Zealand


401 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 26


  Reply # 2068871 6-Aug-2018 17:19
Send private message

In case people missed it, the court case itself was linked and discussed a few days before the Stuff story. Actually I wonder if the Stuff journalist came across it from here. Something similar has happened before. 

 

Since this was a test case (as per lawyers for both parties), I'm assuming that lawyers for the insurers have been going over it carefully to decide if they have grounds to appeal. For a complicated case like this, I'm guessing that they will find something and so it's probably not finished yet. Although in the mean time, the effects on premiums etc are going to come into play. 


7 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 2071532 10-Aug-2018 21:37
Send private message

I was involved in a car crash the other week. Someone rear-ended me on the motorway - he was definitely 'at-fault.' 

 

Thankfully, he had third-party and submitted a claim. I submitted a claim with my insurance and got my excess waived as the at-fault driver submitted a claim so my insurance company is recovering costs from the at-fault's insurance company.

 

Now - my car needs to go into the workshop for a couple of days/weeks and I need a car to go to/from work...

 

I rang my insurance company today and asked what my options were regarding rental cars as I'm the victim (I don't have rental car policy with my insurance).

 

They weren't very helpful... they said I could rent a car from a normal rental company and try to get costs covered by at-fault insurance. However, he said I won't be likely reimbursed the full amount.... Also, I don't like the fact I have to pay up-front fully and then try get reimbursed at a later date. This seems such a hassle for the crash victim....

 

Should I call at-fault insurance company directly and ask for a rental? If they say no... I'm inclined to say that I'll proceed to use a service like Right2Drive and see if they budge... apparently, this tactic has worked previously for some people...

 

How have you guys approached this? Are there any legal rights that I have? According to that article and what the Judge said, it should be my right to have a rental vehicle...... Should I just use Right2Drive? 

 

Please help...


Linux Systems Admin
1051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions
Subscriber

  Reply # 2071534 10-Aug-2018 21:43
Send private message

hojoonsung:

 

I rang my insurance company today and asked what my options were regarding rental cars as I'm the victim (I don't have rental car policy with my insurance).

 

They weren't very helpful... they said I could rent a car from a normal rental company and try to get costs covered by at-fault insurance. However, he said I won't be likely reimbursed the full amount.... Also, I don't like the fact I have to pay up-front fully and then try get reimbursed at a later date. This seems such a hassle for the crash victim....

 

Should I call at-fault insurance company directly and ask for a rental? If they say no... I'm inclined to say that I'll proceed to use a service like Right2Drive and see if they budge... apparently, this tactic has worked previously for some people...

 

How have you guys approached this? Are there any legal rights that I have? According to that article and what the Judge said, it should be my right to have a rental vehicle...... Should I just use Right2Drive? 

 

 

Do what you want. The risks have been well covered in this thread.

 

You sound like someone who gets bloshy when they don't get their every whim.

 

You are not a "victim". It was a car accident. It could just as likely been you at fault.





Integrity Tech Solutions @ Norsewood, New Zealand


3080 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 499

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2072738 13-Aug-2018 15:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

Nil Einne:

 

In case people missed it, the court case itself was linked and discussed a few days before the Stuff story. Actually I wonder if the Stuff journalist came across it from here. Something similar has happened before. 

 

Since this was a test case (as per lawyers for both parties), I'm assuming that lawyers for the insurers have been going over it carefully to decide if they have grounds to appeal. For a complicated case like this, I'm guessing that they will find something and so it's probably not finished yet. Although in the mean time, the effects on premiums etc are going to come into play. 

 

 

Not really all that likely that it'll have a great effect on premiums. They'll probably throw in hire car cover when not-at-fault and the standard add-on for at-fault hire car cover to match what they do in Australia, where insurance already costs pretty much the same amount despite covering more potential liability (in Australia, the CTP will  only cover the not-at-fault party in some states, so for at-fault parties the insurer is up for all damage and medical bills).

 

hojoonsung:

 

Should I call at-fault insurance company directly and ask for a rental? If they say no... I'm inclined to say that I'll proceed to use a service like Right2Drive and see if they budge... apparently, this tactic has worked previously for some people...

 

How have you guys approached this? Are there any legal rights that I have? According to that article and what the Judge said, it should be my right to have a rental vehicle...... Should I just use Right2Drive? 

 

Please help...

 

 

I'd say call the other insurer and suggest it - they may be able to use their purchasing power to get a better rate than if you set a crash hire company onto them and now that there's precedent that they are liable, they may come to the party.

 

MichaelNZ:

 

Do what you want. The risks have been well covered in this thread.

 

You sound like someone who gets bloshy when they don't get their every whim.

 

You are not a "victim". It was a car accident. It could just as likely been you at fault.

 

 

Oh hogwash, you're just being petty now because you've been proven wrong.

 

There's practically such thing as car "accidents" - virtually every single one is caused because someone did something negligent or stupid - a rear-ender is definitely one such case. The person not at fault is entitled to not be worse off than before they were hit, so he's perfectly entitled to a vehicle so he's not stuck relying on taxis and public transport at his own expense.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

NZ and France seek to end use of social media for acts of terrorism
Posted 24-Apr-2019 12:13


Intel introduces the 9th Gen Intel Core mobile processors
Posted 24-Apr-2019 12:03


Spark partners with OPPO to bring new AX5s smartphone to New Zealand
Posted 24-Apr-2019 09:54


Orcon announces new always-on internet service for Small Business
Posted 18-Apr-2019 10:19


Spark Sport prices for Rugby World Cup 2019 announced
Posted 16-Apr-2019 07:58


2degrees launches new unlimited mobile plan
Posted 15-Apr-2019 09:35


Redgate brings together major industry speakers for SQL in the City Summits
Posted 13-Apr-2019 12:35


Exported honey authenticated on Blockchain
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:19


HPE and Nutanix partner to deliver hybrid cloud as a service
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:12


Southern Cross and ASN sign contract for Southern Cross NEXT
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:09


Data security top New Zealand consumer priority when choosing a bank
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:07


Samsung announces first 8K screens to hit New Zealand
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:03


New cyber-protection and insurance product for businesses launched in APAC
Posted 10-Apr-2019 20:59


Kiwis ensure streaming is never interrupted by opting for uncapped broadband plans
Posted 7-Apr-2019 09:05


DHL Express introduces new MyDHL+ online portal to make shipping easier
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:51



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.