networkn:
I think we were watching a different game. They were massively physical, accurate and the skills on display were AB's worthy. They made the gain line with relative ease and finished tries that a year ago wouldn't have happened. They deserve a lot of credit.
The AB's have something to prove and I expect them to be angry with themselves over the way they didn't front up, and as such I am hoping they will (legally) batter the Wallabies this week.
I agree. Often when the Wabbalies were dominating it was like the ABs were wearing green and gold. AUS was that good. 14 men or not they were excellent. The past tells me news that AB;s were helped by refs. Not my call but frequent news. Like Federer gets better calls, etc. Now, we lost and we blame refs? I get that, but as much as I like sport, I like sport, I favour good sport over a Kiwi win. I want a good win. Id rather have a sad loss than a ref win. This whole ref saga is all over the place. Tennis had that, but its under control. Rugger is not. They need to sort the rules, so that 9/10 its a good call. When BB moved the ball 3 meters to help his kick thats a shocker. It really is. Then SH said that happens all the time, as if to accept it, I hate that. Rules are rules. TMO should have penalised BB then ALL players will play by the rules. The Scott Barrett issue, id rather have that take 15 minutes to decide, than end up with news on it every day. I cant be arsed with sport that ruled by politics.
The trick is , it doesnt matter who got it wrong. AB's, RSA, Akaroa, play by the rules, then its fair for all. The we won't have a CWC or RWC where we discuss it for ever.