joker97: after sleeping on it here is my analysis
Australia - didn't get carried away, did what they were told. not high on skills, but very dedicated the the cause. made many many errors when basic skill was called upon, but didn't give up and kept heads up.
7 + 8 dominated our 6 and 7. 9 - 10 had no idea what there were doing, until their replacements came on and ran the ABs off the park. their 12 - 13 were solid. their wingers are really old and more boxers than wingers, but very experienced.
ABs - brimming with confidence. have their own brands, youtube stars, supreme in skills. no idea what there were doing when the ball can't be run. became one dimensional. 8 did the job of 6 7 8, and stole lots of wallaby lineouts. 9 was ok but 10, well you could put a traffic cone there. missed a tackle that led to a try. 12 - 13 were ok. outside backs - didn't see savea - maybe twice or thrice. but there were solid there.
can't comment on scrums. scrums are controlled by refs not players.
ref - heavily sided the ABs in the first half until Steven Moore got into his head then he was more equal, and his mistakes affected both sides rather than one.
Pretty good summary. They didn't gel, or watch the ball, or decide what to do. When SBW first kicked the ball, I could see him get it, can't do anything, what do I do, took a default kick to get rid of it. Early on, they looked slick,as a commentator said. I thought right then, they aren't playing the fast game, fast pass game that we know and love, taking time off the opposition, they were doing that on steroids, very very fast and short passes, looked great, but IMO they played above their skill level, it was like 50-50 passes then.
Eden Park? Hmm, I really dunno.