Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




373 posts

Ultimate Geek


#245334 29-Jan-2019 20:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=12197694

 

While I agree that unions wielded too much power pre-"employment contracts act", I think Mike Hosking fails to consider if now businesses wield too much power.

 

While I am too young (48) to fully comprehend the union situation in 70/80's, my take is that we imported a lot of Unionist behaviours in that period. And the Unions did wield too much power.

 

But My take is now that Businesses, can cart blanch do what they want.. there is not a balance

 

My take is many businesses have taken advantage of the low minimum wage, to stagnate wage growth rates, to race to the bottom 

 

I personally would like to see T1.5 back after 40hours mandatory. Not to raise wages, but to encourage better work life balance for everyone, not just the well off..


Create new topic
1783 posts

Uber Geek


  #2170024 30-Jan-2019 08:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

That's the thing though - 1.5 after 40 hours doesn't work for people on salaries, who also lose a significant amount of unpaid labour to missed lunch breaks and starting early/finishing late. I've heard rumours about a recent EC hearing about unpaid salary work but haven't been able to find any details. 

 

Unfortunately the Govt basically rewards low wages with top ups like WFFTC and the Accommodation supplements, which everyone tries their best to avoid talking about. Why should employers pick up the tab when the Government is going to dish out extra cash a week, right? 

 

Kind of telling that we have record low unemployment and people still can't get a take-home wage to cover the costs of living.

 

Agreed we need to find a new balance but we also need to acknowledge that things that are killing us like a lack of physical activity, not enough time to see doctors, money woes etc are just as prevalent in the formerly-comfortable middle class professions now. A fix aimed just at the lower end isn't going to cut it and may even be inflationary. 




373 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2170080 30-Jan-2019 10:35
Send private message

GV27: Unfortunately the Govt basically rewards low wages with top ups like WFFTC and the Accommodation supplements, which everyone tries their best to avoid talking about. Why should employers pick up the tab when the Government is going to dish out extra cash a week, right? 

 

Agree WFFTC has allowed businesses to leverage this, hopefully the new tax package will go a ways to fixing this

 

A fix aimed just at the lower end isn't going to cut it and may even be inflationary. 

 

We do actually need some inflationary pressure, inflation is not all bad, that's why they target 2-3%. I think the raising of minimum wage is a good thing.


 
 
 
 


1783 posts

Uber Geek


  #2170117 30-Jan-2019 12:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

attewell:

 

GV27: Unfortunately the Govt basically rewards low wages with top ups like WFFTC and the Accommodation supplements, which everyone tries their best to avoid talking about. Why should employers pick up the tab when the Government is going to dish out extra cash a week, right? 

 

Agree WFFTC has allowed businesses to leverage this, hopefully the new tax package will go a ways to fixing this

 

A fix aimed just at the lower end isn't going to cut it and may even be inflationary. 

 

We do actually need some inflationary pressure, inflation is not all bad, that's why they target 2-3%. I think the raising of minimum wage is a good thing.

 

 

Inflation is great if you're on an hourly wage or you can get an increase in line with inflation. As we've seen with living costs over the last few years, this doesn't usually happen. 


9715 posts

Uber Geek


  #2170473 30-Jan-2019 21:44
4 people support this post
Send private message

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.


1783 posts

Uber Geek


  #2170992 31-Jan-2019 19:01
3 people support this post
Send private message

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Probably as much qualification as a union has to speak for someone who has chosen to not be part of one, yet we're about to give them the power to argue terms for entire industries. 


9715 posts

Uber Geek


  #2171114 1-Feb-2019 08:57
Send private message

GV27:

 

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Probably as much qualification as a union has to speak for someone who has chosen to not be part of one, yet we're about to give them the power to argue terms for entire industries. 

 

 

That comment really doesn't make any sense at all if you think about it.


1783 posts

Uber Geek


  #2171311 1-Feb-2019 15:09
Send private message

Fred99:

 

GV27:

 

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Probably as much qualification as a union has to speak for someone who has chosen to not be part of one, yet we're about to give them the power to argue terms for entire industries. 

 

 

That comment really doesn't make any sense at all if you think about it.

 

 

Can you point out the bit you don't think makes any sense? Freedom to associate or not is considered a human right. 


 
 
 
 


1795 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2171451 1-Feb-2019 19:49
Send private message

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Similar qualifications and financial position as the PM perhaps?  Perhaps we should say that nobody earning over 100k should have a say in labour laws?  It could equally be said that the govt are only pushing a barrow for the trade unions, given that they are a significant source of party funding


9715 posts

Uber Geek


  #2171577 1-Feb-2019 22:45
Send private message

GV27:

 

Fred99:

 

GV27:

 

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Probably as much qualification as a union has to speak for someone who has chosen to not be part of one, yet we're about to give them the power to argue terms for entire industries. 

 

 

That comment really doesn't make any sense at all if you think about it.

 

 

Can you point out the bit you don't think makes any sense? Freedom to associate or not is considered a human right. 

 

 

The "freedom to associate" part.

 

What are you on about?


626 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2172376 3-Feb-2019 18:36
Send private message

Fred99:

 

WTF is Hosking's qualification to w*nk on about minimum wage, unions etc?

 

People need to stop listening to "one percenters" - they're clearly pushing a barrow for their own advantage - not for the well being of the majority.

 

 

Should we also stop listening to the bottom "one percenters" as they're also pushing a barrow for their own advantage? Everyone's viewpoint is valid and worth listening to.


626 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2172379 3-Feb-2019 18:44
Send private message

attewell:

 

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=12197694

 

While I agree that unions wielded too much power pre-"employment contracts act", I think Mike Hosking fails to consider if now businesses wield too much power.

 

While I am too young (48) to fully comprehend the union situation in 70/80's, my take is that we imported a lot of Unionist behaviours in that period. And the Unions did wield too much power.

 

But My take is now that Businesses, can cart blanch do what they want.. there is not a balance

 

My take is many businesses have taken advantage of the low minimum wage, to stagnate wage growth rates, to race to the bottom 

 

I personally would like to see T1.5 back after 40hours mandatory. Not to raise wages, but to encourage better work life balance for everyone, not just the well off..

 

 

 

 

As an employer, I wouldn't say we can cart blanch do what we want. It's extremely difficult to hire or remove an employee (unless within the 90 day trail period, but that works both ways). What specific aspects do you think are unfair towards employees? That's not bait, I'm genuinely interested in what you think.

 

Regarding the T1.5 after 40 hours, would that apply to salaries as well? Many employers pay themselves a wage/salary but work far more than 40 hours, so would T1.5 apply to the employer as well?

 

Based on what I've been told over the years by family members and colleagues, I'm not sure that the work-life balance in the 80's was necessarily better as a result of the awards scheme, or penalty rates. Perhaps there is a better alternative to encourage work-life balance.... I don't know.

 

 




373 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2172415 3-Feb-2019 19:59
Send private message

wsnz: As an employer, I wouldn't say we can cart blanch do what we want. It's extremely difficult to hire or remove an employee (unless within the 90 day trail period, but that works both ways). What specific aspects do you think are unfair towards employees? That's not bait, I'm genuinely interested in what you think.

 

Regarding the T1.5 after 40 hours, would that apply to salaries as well? Many employers pay themselves a wage/salary but work far more than 40 hours, so would T1.5 apply to the employer as well?

 

Based on what I've been told over the years by family members and colleagues, I'm not sure that the work-life balance in the 80's was necessarily better as a result of the awards scheme, or penalty rates. Perhaps there is a better alternative to encourage work-life balance.... I don't know.

 

Suppose I shouldn't say employers are all bad, but the framework they are given to work between, can allow unintended consequences or behaviors..

 

So like be employment contracts act, things were too one-sided to unions, and on reflection of post-employment contracts act.. there are problems.. which likes of bill birch is acknowledging

 

Just we have scare mongering from celebrities that we are going back into teh dark ages.. I would like to give more credit to this Govt than what has bee painted in herald article. 

 

Up until few months ago, I was earning well above average wage.. I see some of those people well remunerated, so overtime wouldnt make huge difference to them. they probably still earn enough to pay mortgage & childcare

 

More of concern is those on minimum wage to living wage.. the raising of minimum wage will help, I just thought T1.5 after 40 hours would an extra assistance.

 

Edit: one bad think employers in general can do is defer & mute wage growth, due to lack of unions bargaining 


Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

COVID-19: new charitable initiative to fund remote monitoring for at-risk patients
Posted 2-Apr-2020 11:07


Huawei introduces the P40 Series of Android-based smartphones
Posted 31-Mar-2020 17:03


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip now available for pre-order in New Zealand
Posted 31-Mar-2020 16:39


New online learning platform for kids stuck at home during COVID-19 lockdown
Posted 26-Mar-2020 21:35


New 5G Nokia smartphone unveiled as portfolio expands
Posted 26-Mar-2020 17:11


D-Link ANZ launches wireless AC1200 4G LTE router
Posted 26-Mar-2020 16:32


Ring introduces two new video doorbells and new pre-roll technology
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:59


OPPO uncovers flagship Find X2 Pro smartphone
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:54


D-Link COVR-2202 mesh Wi-Fi system now protected by McAfee
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:00


Spark Sport opens its platform up to all New Zealanders at no charge
Posted 17-Mar-2020 10:04


Spark launches 5G Starter Fund
Posted 8-Mar-2020 19:19


TRENDnet launches high-performance WiFi Mesh Router System
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:48


Sony boosts full-frame lens line-up with introduction of FE 20mm F1.8 G large-aperture ultra-wide-angle prime Lens
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:44


Vector and Spark teamed up on smart metering initiative
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:42


Schneider Electric launches new PDL Pro Series designed specifically for the commercial building market
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.