Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
Banana?
3860 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 765

Subscriber

  Reply # 666329 2-Aug-2012 16:04
Send private message

mattRSK: No, it comes back to my belief that the purpose of marriage is to raise a family. Same sex unions are completely different and I think should not be covered under the same definition. Anyway that's my belief. What else can I say, that is how I would vote if I was in parliament. Thankyou for the respectful debate. 




So you believe I should not be married? My wife and I have been married going on 7 years (this month actually - thanks for the reminder!). We had no intention of having children, and now we can't 'naturally'. Should we not have got married??? I love my wife and want to spend the rest of my life with her, but you believe she should not be my wife.

Interesting.


hmm sorry about formatting - tags not working properly for me.

1280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 513


  Reply # 666331 2-Aug-2012 16:07
Send private message

crackrdbycracku: I don't, and have never, seen why it matters if you are born a certain way or if you choose to be a certain way. 

The rights are attributed to the human. 

A person chooses to be religious but that, as far a I know, has never been used, by civilised people, as an argument to deny then the same civil rights as everybody else.  
  

Somebody hasn't been paying attention in history class - Various people's choice of religion has been used as an excuse to deny them any conceivable right, up to & including the right to life. Pick a Holy War, any holy war. Jews, Catholics, Protestants, pick a faith, any faith, some other faith has merrily denied them anything from citizenship to life simply for professing their faith.

ETA - apart from that, I'm in complete agreement.

 
 
 
 


1168 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 69


  Reply # 666336 2-Aug-2012 16:11
Send private message

BlueShift:
crackrdbycracku: I don't, and have never, seen why it matters if you are born a certain way or if you choose to be a certain way. 

The rights are attributed to the human. 

A person chooses to be religious but that, as far a I know, has never been used, by civilised people, as an argument to deny then the same civil rights as everybody else.  

  


Somebody hasn't been paying attention in history class - Various people's choice of religion has been used as an excuse to deny them any conceivable right, up to & including the right to life. Pick a Holy War, any holy war. Jews, Catholics, Protestants, pick a faith, any faith, some other faith has merrily denied them anything from citizenship to life simply for professing their faith.


As I said: by civilised people. 

This debate is about how the NZ Govt and civil society should act, there are plenty of examples of regimes behaving terribly. But so what? 




Didn't anybody tell you I was a hacker?

1199 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 131


  Reply # 666351 2-Aug-2012 16:28
Send private message

The mere fact that this debate is going on, shows to me that the world is changing, rapidly, for the better in my opinion.

Not so many years ago homosexuality was illegal in NZ, and now a majority of society is on the verge of not just accepting homosexual marriages, but virtually saying "why on earth CAN'T they get married, we should fix that".

It makes me smile to think that in probably 20 years we'll look back at this time and think, "how did we think it was right to discriminate like that!", in the same way we do about past racial discrimination today.

It shouldn't be for the state or society, to determine what is and isn't a valid civil relationship between consenting people, it is up to the people who actually have those relationships.

Leave religion at your church, temple, mosque, and home.




---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 666365 2-Aug-2012 16:41
Send private message

trig42: 

So you believe I should not be married? My wife and I have been married going on 7 years (this month actually - thanks for the reminder!). We had no intention of having children, and now we can't 'naturally'. Should we not have got married??? I love my wife and want to spend the rest of my life with her, but you believe she should not be my wife.

Interesting.


hmm sorry about formatting - tags not working properly for me.
 


That doesn't make any sense.

Whether you choose to or not, or can't doesn't matter. Biologically a male and a female can have children and raise a family. You are just an exception.

BDFL - Memuneh
58093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9634

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 666368 2-Aug-2012 16:45
Send private message

I've updated the other post so it makes sense now.




Banana?
3860 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 765

Subscriber

  Reply # 666376 2-Aug-2012 16:45
Send private message

freitasm: I've updated the other post so it makes sense now.

thanks.

805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 666384 2-Aug-2012 16:55
Send private message

I wasn't talking about formatting.

805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 666385 2-Aug-2012 16:55
Send private message

I wasn't talking about formatting. I have updated my post.

Awesome
4745 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1034

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 666389 2-Aug-2012 17:01
Send private message

mattRSK: Biologically a male and a female can have children and raise a family.


Not always true. Are you saying that a man and a women who cannot have children for biological reasons shouldn't get married? Or do they get let off on a technicality?

Marriage and having children are mutually exclusive!




Twitter: ajobbins


805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 666392 2-Aug-2012 17:05
Send private message

This thread is going around in circles. Everyone is entitled to their belief. At the end of the day it's out of our hands. Parliament will decide, that wont change peoples beliefs. So really there is no point wasting any more time talking about it.

805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 666394 2-Aug-2012 17:08
Send private message

ajobbins:
mattRSK: Biologically a male and a female can have children and raise a family.


Not always true. Are you saying that a man and a women who cannot have children for biological reasons shouldn't get married? Or do they get let off on a technicality?

Marriage and having children are mutually exclusive!


I answered that in the same post you quoted from.

I'm @nate
6271 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 366

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

Reply # 666395 2-Aug-2012 17:11
Send private message

mattRSK: So really there is no point wasting any more time talking about it.


Doesn't mean we still can't entertain healthy debate on this topic.




1168 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 69


  Reply # 666403 2-Aug-2012 17:21
Send private message

mattRSK:
ajobbins:
mattRSK: Biologically a male and a female can have children and raise a family.


Not always true. Are you saying that a man and a women who cannot have children for biological reasons shouldn't get married? Or do they get let off on a technicality?

Marriage and having children are mutually exclusive!


I answered that in the same post you quoted from.



Yeah, with:

You are just an exception.

You seriously don't see that as a slippery road? Rules are there in large part to protect us exceptions. 

As far as the debate goes: 

a) Since when has an online forum ever had everybody agree... ever.
b) Disagreement is a healthy part of democracy. 
c) It's fun.




Didn't anybody tell you I was a hacker?

2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 666411 2-Aug-2012 17:38
Send private message

menabassily:

Ok, "Natural" means it's nature's way, and yes eating a husband is normal and happens, as humans we have this criminalized. Same thing with same sex relationships, it's normal, it happens in nature as well, but they are not legally allowed to get married like others.

Second thing, sexual preference is not about "learning" however, yes we do learn from nature, most of our inventions are based on that bare idea.

Update:

And yes, we are animals, you said we evolved, that's good, pigs are no fish and fish are no birds. What's your point????


My point is that by using the word natural I mean physically and “mechanically” its just does not work. Never has, and never will. Gay couples are not natural. Maybe thats not the word, but its not the norm for obvious reasons.

Gay and Lesbian couples cannot make children. Their offspring cannot have the DNA of both parents like a “normal” child baring relationship can. I see it as them asking for rights to something nature does not allow.

So yes I see gay relationships as unnatural. Its got nothing to do with the way I was brought up, or my religion. Maybe its just that part of me that shudders when I see two guys together, makes me ill. (Sorry if that offends, but its how I feel) And I know that many heterosexual men feel the same. Allowing gay marriage is not going to solve the problem about society not accepting it.  Many people including myself will never accept it.

Just my view. Go on shoot me down ...

1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16


Mandatory data breach reporting in Australia
Posted 13-Jun-2017 11:30



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.