Personally I did not find that funny in the slightest. At the same time, no one could take that as a serious contribution. It is close to an ad-hominum and does not address a point at all. Personally I'd rather see that removed than see more of the same thing. It appears you are calling Geektastic a racist, and without any cause or evidence.
I think you will reconsider this and I'm sure the mods will be happy to remove the original (and posts quoting it), at your request.
Nor is it supposed to be funny, and I don't see how it could be construed as ad-hominum.
I painted a picture, a valid circumstantial argument, of how Geektastic's idea would play out in this country.
He specifically mentions “Castle doctrine” - a doctrine which I do have some limited experience with, having lived in states with Castle Laws.
If introduced in New Zealand they'd open a Pandora's Box of armed vendetta, vigilante justice and summary executions, the detrimental and far-reaching consequences of which would destroy the social fabric of our country.
And Racist? - Don't be afraid to call a spade a spade.
Maori - as a race, and a people, are massively over represented in crimes of violence, property crime and in our prisons.
The cost of Castle doctrine here would be borne by young, male Maori.
In Florida not long ago George Zimmerman was aquitted of shooting to death a a young black man - Trayvon Martin, wearing a hoodie, who walked through his neighbourhood.
It struck a chord and was well publicised in the US, as there, young black males overwhelmingly suffer from the “stand your ground” laws which were invoked in his defense.
Those laws play to fear, and racism - not social justice.
Edit – I own firearms here – and overseas. I've nothing against guns per se, just believe they should not be used to kill humans. Ever.
Your point is now a lot clearer. A large number of people would never have guessed that was the basis of what you wrote earlier.