Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




488 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted

Topic # 154242 22-Oct-2014 08:51
Send private message

Hi

This is the short version: I've had years of ongoing problems with the IRD. Mostly, the faults are down to extremely poor record keeping and lack of accuracy on their part. I have evidence of this and in my most recent encounter, I had an appointment with a gentleman who identified himself as a member of their legal team. In my appt. I presented paperwork that showed a difference between what I was being billed for and what I was to be billed for and he assured me that the computer was "not correct" and "frequently made these errors" and I was to "ignore the statements and paperwork" as his word was "in fact the correct deal". Prior to this, I had the same conversation with two customer support reps on the call centre number. When I challenged him to write a letter to me, explaining the error and to produce a correct statement, he agreed that was a reasonable request which would take time as the statement would have to be manually produced, but he called an hour later to inform me that he was in fact wrong, that the information he gave me in our meeting was incorrect and the computer statement was right, but he would need to alter it by wiping the incorrect late payment fee (for a charge in question, that we have now agreed is not correct). Honest, this is what was said.

I have this same fiasco every three to four months. Each time, the new CSR or interviewer I speak to denies the last detail I was given was right or even that I was there or even had an appoiintment or even that there is any evidence I have ever complained (no sh!t) and I have to start fresh. I am always having 'extra' charges wiped that are, supposedly, put there by error, "by the computer". It is always explained to me that the computer system is so old it can't understand modern tax law or there is a minor difference in the date of my deduction and the date of precessing etc.

I once threatened to take them to court as at one time, the amount in question was about $13k and they told me to feel free to take my case to family court at which I was told by my lawyer there is no chance of winning against them unless I can prove they are doing it deliberately and the pain is real and I have to "put up with it". Their "independent lawyer" had an interview with me in which she told me they were right even when they got it wrong and I should suck it up - honest, I was gobsmacked.

So now it is routine that every three months I book an appt with IRD, go in, insist on seeing my statement and make them justify every line item wich ALWAYS results in them admitting error and "refunding" me. This is not over charges or tax variations, this is penalties and interest on penalties that are not supposed to be charged at all.

Who can I call to say: "enough!" or are they just building a case for a new computer system?


TL;DR: IRD short charges my payroll NCP deductions by a few dollars each mo., then bills me late payment every month for the remaining months of the year + interest and tells me to suck it up. I'm over it. Who's in charge?




View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 842
Inactive user


  Reply # 1159739 22-Oct-2014 08:59
Send private message

Contact the minister responsible and mention the media.

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1159755 22-Oct-2014 09:27
Send private message

@Biddle Corp audits the IRD and keeps them in line

 
 
 
 


664 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 273

Subscriber

  Reply # 1159758 22-Oct-2014 09:35
Send private message

I feel for you.

I've just come out of a similar situation, in Canada, dealing with the Canada Revenue Agency.
Dragged on for nearly 10 years !!! The stress was immense, especially when the penalties began to build up.

There, I was finally able to achieve a result including a letter of apology, cancelation of penalties, and a review of their processes by appealing to the Tax Ombudsman.

I wonder if New Zealand has a similar to oversee the IRD?

Edit: looks as thoughthe IRD does have a similar complaints process, and ombudsman.

2784 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 121


  Reply # 1159761 22-Oct-2014 09:40
Send private message

I feel for anyone who has to deal with this process, my fathers business got audited by the IRD many years ago, everything was above board it was just "his time". The resulting stress and expense damn near killed him, and after many weeks they came to the conclusion that everything was in fact correct and off they went.

I wish you well.





12141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3954

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1159779 22-Oct-2014 09:46
Send private message

gundar: Hi

This is the short version: I've had years of ongoing problems with the IRD. Mostly, the faults are down to extremely poor record keeping and lack of accuracy on their part. I have evidence of this and in my most recent encounter, I had an appointment with a gentleman who identified himself as a member of their legal team. In my appt. I presented paperwork that showed a difference between what I was being billed for and what I was to be billed for and he assured me that the computer was "not correct" and "frequently made these errors" and I was to "ignore the statements and paperwork" as his word was "in fact the correct deal". Prior to this, I had the same conversation with two customer support reps on the call centre number. When I challenged him to write a letter to me, explaining the error and to produce a correct statement, he agreed that was a reasonable request which would take time as the statement would have to be manually produced, but he called an hour later to inform me that he was in fact wrong, that the information he gave me in our meeting was incorrect and the computer statement was right, but he would need to alter it by wiping the incorrect late payment fee (for a charge in question, that we have now agreed is not correct). Honest, this is what was said.

I have this same fiasco every three to four months. Each time, the new CSR or interviewer I speak to denies the last detail I was given was right or even that I was there or even had an appoiintment or even that there is any evidence I have ever complained (no sh!t) and I have to start fresh. I am always having 'extra' charges wiped that are, supposedly, put there by error, "by the computer". It is always explained to me that the computer system is so old it can't understand modern tax law or there is a minor difference in the date of my deduction and the date of precessing etc.

I once threatened to take them to court as at one time, the amount in question was about $13k and they told me to feel free to take my case to family court at which I was told by my lawyer there is no chance of winning against them unless I can prove they are doing it deliberately and the pain is real and I have to "put up with it". Their "independent lawyer" had an interview with me in which she told me they were right even when they got it wrong and I should suck it up - honest, I was gobsmacked.

So now it is routine that every three months I book an appt with IRD, go in, insist on seeing my statement and make them justify every line item wich ALWAYS results in them admitting error and "refunding" me. This is not over charges or tax variations, this is penalties and interest on penalties that are not supposed to be charged at all.

Who can I call to say: "enough!" or are they just building a case for a new computer system?


TL;DR: IRD short charges my payroll NCP deductions by a few dollars each mo., then bills me late payment every month for the remaining months of the year + interest and tells me to suck it up. I'm over it. Who's in charge?





Sadly not unique - in the UK, the HMRC (known colloquially as 'Her Majesty's Robbers and Crooks') make more mistakes than you would believe.

My father had an on-going VAT dispute with them that lasted over 20 years....which he won 2 years before he died...





547 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 106


  Reply # 1159782 22-Oct-2014 09:51
Send private message

Hi,

Three different parties could help here

The IRD themselves

The Tax Ombundsman - fact Sheet

And the Taxation Review Office -  http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/taxation-review-authority

Sorry haven't had time to look at each one :)

Clint




14280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1159813 22-Oct-2014 10:17
Send private message

They are building a new computer system, starting next year, as I understand it. It's a massive complex task, probably costing billions of dollars.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


1245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 137


  Reply # 1159833 22-Oct-2014 10:37
Send private message

All Government departments should be subject to external independent audits - what they failed to point out is of the big 4 external auditors most departments choose the most 'slack/relaxed' of auditors (namely starts with either an E or D) with 'predetermined' outcomes - speaking from experience and 'interviews' as a contractor/vendor so as their organization appears squeaky clean



3222 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 923

Trusted

  Reply # 1159871 22-Oct-2014 11:13
Send private message

timmmay: They are building a new computer system, starting next year, as I understand it. It's a massive complex task, probably costing billions of dollars.


I'm sure it will be just as successful as Novopay and INCIS.

12141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3954

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1159875 22-Oct-2014 11:21
Send private message

sidefx:
timmmay: They are building a new computer system, starting next year, as I understand it. It's a massive complex task, probably costing billions of dollars.


I'm sure it will be just as successful as Novopay and INCIS.


Still got to beat the UK who canned a new system for the health service last year after spending NZ$30 BILLION on it...!!

I cannot believe no one went to jail over that. Waste of public money on that scale should be a criminal offence.

I do hope we manage to do better here.





14280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1159883 22-Oct-2014 11:42
Send private message

sidefx:
timmmay: They are building a new computer system, starting next year, as I understand it. It's a massive complex task, probably costing billions of dollars.


I'm sure it will be just as successful as Novopay and INCIS.


Pretty sure they'll be fairly careful. IT projects are complex.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


659 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 144
Inactive user


  Reply # 1159885 22-Oct-2014 11:43
Send private message

Id say you might be out of luck, the entire system is setup to protect the governments interests, sure on the face of it it looks like there are paths to raise dispute but they all lead to a deliberate endless loop of no-one taking responsibility.



mdf

2027 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 599

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1159886 22-Oct-2014 11:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

The Auditor-General is responsible for auditing all government departments, including IRD (to give it it's full name, the Office of the Controller and Auditor General). The Auditor-General usually appoints Audit New Zealand to carry this out on her behalf. So far as I know, this is focussed on the accounting side of things though.

If you've got a complaint, you're better off following the disputes/complaints process. There are a few, depending on whether you're disputing a particular tax assessment (which it sounds like you've done extensively) or a complaint about process or service. For the latter, there's a Complaints Management Service. If that doesn't work, you can go to the Ombudsman. Last I heard though, the Ombudsman was swamped and you can expect to wait up to 18 months for your complaint to even be looked at.

12141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3954

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1159902 22-Oct-2014 11:55
Send private message

mdf: The Auditor-General is responsible for auditing all government departments, including IRD (to give it it's full name, the Office of the Controller and Auditor General). The Auditor-General usually appoints Audit New Zealand to carry this out on her behalf. So far as I know, this is focussed on the accounting side of things though.

If you've got a complaint, you're better off following the disputes/complaints process. There are a few, depending on whether you're disputing a particular tax assessment (which it sounds like you've done extensively) or a complaint about process or service. For the latter, there's a Complaints Management Service. If that doesn't work, you can go to the Ombudsman. Last I heard though, the Ombudsman was swamped and you can expect to wait up to 18 months for your complaint to even be looked at.


It's a very Orwellian job title.."what do you do?" "Well, I am The Controller."







488 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted

  Reply # 1159951 22-Oct-2014 13:00
Send private message

heylinb4nz: Id say you might be out of luck, the entire system is setup to protect the governments interests, sure on the face of it it looks like there are paths to raise dispute but they all lead to a deliberate endless loop of no-one taking responsibility.




I have made several laps of this circuit already. It seems that specific types of complaint cannot be entertained anywhere else excpt within the IRD, so yes, the evidence supports your assertion. And when I say 'entertained' I mean as in 'circuis'.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.