![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
--
Please note all comments are the product of my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
sbiddle: Are you sure your devices are both negotiating at FE or Gigabit? You haven't answered this yet.
I've seen plenty of Snap speedtest images showing overdimensiong in place on the 200/20 plan, so until the question about devices negotiating at 100Mbps is answered, it's hard to look beyond this.
RalphFromSnap: Hi Publius,
Can you PM me your Snap username so I can look into this for you.
Thanks!
^RO
Publius:RalphFromSnap: Hi Publius,
Can you PM me your Snap username so I can look into this for you.
Thanks!
^RO
PM sent. I'm happy to work through this with you. Its entirely possible it could be a provisioning fault.
bongojona: out of interest, what speeds would you be getting in typical real world downloads ?
I am on VDSL - still struggling to get all my neighbours to sign the cable laying consent so we can get UFB, and am not sure I need 100Mbs anyways
Publius:
Yes, confirmed by ethtool that the NIC at the time was running at 1Gbps.
I suspect that those getting real-world 100Mbps are not on Chorus like I am.
Lorenceo: I can confirm that the full 100/20Mbps is very doable on Snap.
Here's a result from a test I did at a friend's house with my router + laptop. Connection between the router + ONT, as well as the connection between the router and laptop were running at 1Gbit/s. They're on Snap's 100/20Mbps plan, in Auckland with a Chorus ONT.
Publius: [snip]
I would have thought the newer 100/20 profile was right-performing? (these take into account the fact that 100Mbps L2 is not 100Mbps L3 and "over-provision" the service so 100Mbps L3 is possible.)
--
Please note all comments are the product of my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
Publius:
Does anyone have specs for the newer right-performing Chorus products?
I would have thought the newer 100/20 profile was right-performing? (these take into account the fact that 100Mbps L2 is not 100Mbps L3 and "over-provision" the service so 100Mbps L3 is possible.)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |